IBJNews

Jury begins deliberations in Durham fraud trial

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The jury began deliberations Wednesday morning in the federal fraud trial of financier Tim Durham and two co-defendants.

U.S. District Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson at 9:50 a.m. finished reading jury instructions on the 12-count indictment against Durham and co-defendants Jim Cochran and Rick Snow, and turned over the case to the panel of 12 jurors and four alternates.

The judge told two of the alternates they were free to go home, but told them they could stay if they want to observe deliberations. Only the 12 jurors are allowed to offer opinions and discuss the case.

The group will be sequestered during deliberations, eating meals at the federal courthouse until they reach a verdict. The court also arranged rooms at an undisclosed hotel in case the jury is not on pace to reach its verdict by Wednesday evening, Magnus-Stinson noted.

Attorneys for the prosecution and defense offered their closing arguments Tuesday afternoon, a few hours after defense attorneys for the three defendants rested. The trial began June 11 in U.S. District Court.

The defense presentations lasted less than two hours and did not include testimony from Durham or his co-defendants. The U.S. Attorney's Office offered six days of testimony, thousands of pages of documents and recordings from FBI wiretaps as it tried to convince jurors that the defendants ran Ohio-based Fair Finance as a Ponzi scheme, defrauding investors of more than $200 million.

Durham, Cochran and Snow are facing 10 counts of wire fraud, one count of securities fraud, and one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and securities fraud. If convicted, they face decades in prison and steep fines.

To catch up on IBJ's coverage of Fair Finance and Tim Durham, click here. For up-to-the-minute updates, follow @PropertyLines and @IBJNews on Twitter.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. This is a big help. Thanks for share it here.

  2. Doug Henning!

  3. These guy were thugs — they grew up in freaking Haughville! Smh, sigh. If the mayor needs/wants "quality" Black Hoosiers who are NOT corrupt, give me a call — I know plenty. Land bank info here - http://www.kubepharm.com/indylandbank/IndyLandBank.html

  4. Magician and illusionist!

  5. The basic idea of nice apartments with parking and retail is a good one, but this design seems overwhelmingly big/tall for Broad Ripple. The size could be disguised a bit with lots of big trees/landscaping, but the complex is too massive to blend in easily. That section of canal between College and Westfield will also need to be upgraded on both sides. Nice apartments facing onto a nice promenade with shade trees/plantings could bring together the canal towpath/Monon recreation, the outdoor seating at existing restaurants, and this project into something that upgrades the whole area. A plan for the whole stretch makes more sense than facing nice new housing onto what looks like a ditch. Is there a plan? Does the public have input? Who pays? The apartment idea seems to be reasonable, but Whole Foods is not a good idea for appropriate retail. Besides the store being physically too big, there are already Fresh Market at 54xCollege and Whole Foods in Nora for fancy groceries. Good Earth and Kroger are within walking distance of the Shell site. There are at least 7 grocery stores within a safe bike ride. Whole Foods would add nothing but traffic congestion. This design is on the right track, but there needs to be more work done to ensure that it blends in with and enhances the existing community. A project that large will set a tone for that whole part of town. It could be a real asset, but only if done right.

ADVERTISEMENT