Lawmakers plans to renew bill against same-sex marriage

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A proposal to write Indiana's same-sex marriage ban into the state constitution may be on hold as Republican leaders ponder its fate this year, but the House and Senate sponsors are charging ahead anyway.

Rep. Eric Turner, R-Cicero, said he plans to introduce the measure in the House this year. And Sen. Dennis Kruse, R-Auburn, has already filed the proposal in the Senate.

Turner was the author of the measure that passed in 2011 by a vote of 70-26 in the House and 40-10 in the Senate. The General Assembly would have to sign off on it again, this year or in 2014, and then send the proposal to voters for final approval.

"We do have some flexibility between this year and next. We recognize that," Turner said. "But frankly, some of us would like to put it behind us and let the public weigh in."

The Supreme Court's decision to take up a pair of cases dealing with gay marriage and employee benefits for same-sex couples has led Republican leaders in both chambers to hold back on making any plans this year.

Senate President Pro Tem David Long, a Fort Wayne Republican, said he is waiting for his staff to review any impact from the Supreme Court before deciding whether to move on the issue this year.

"There's no definitive decision on that as of yet," he said Tuesday.

Republican House Speaker Brian Bosma, an Indianapolis Republican, pointed out Monday he did not include the ban in a legislative agenda released by House Republicans, but he has also refused to slam the door shut on the issue.

"Why is everybody focusing on this issue?" Bosma asked Monday, the opening day of the 2013 session. "We're here to talk about jobs, the budget, and workforce development and education. I'm sure some of these issues will be discussed, but it certainly wasn't part of our agenda and it wasn't part of the discussion on our part today either."

Turner, a top-ranking Republican in the House, said he understands Long and Bosma will have to work out a timetable, but said he is confident in the support for the ban in the Assembly.

Democrats opened the 2013 session with an effort to place gay marriage and other social issues on hold. House Minority Leader Scott Pelath, a Michigan City Democrat, asked Republicans, who outnumber Democrats 69-31 in the House, to place a two-year moratorium on social issues. But Bosma rejected that request Monday.


  • Where do these Nuts come from?
    Eric Turner and Dennis Kruse are bigots. They are an embarrassment to the Repbulican Party and the State of Indiana.
  • Same Sex Marriage Ban
    LEGISLATORS: Do not waste any more time on banning same sex marriage.
  • Read Matt Tulley today
    I wish every one of our legislators would take 5 minutes and read Matt's well written and enlightened column in today's (Wednesday) Indianapolis Star. It says it all.
  • Embarrassed in Indiana
    Just moved back to my home state and now realize why I wanted to leave in the first place. Backwards, Bigoted, and lacking a secular government. Help! I'm still in America, right?
  • Look at our divorce rates
    The Republicans say they want to protect traditional marriage, but have they actually looked around to see what that is? I don't know many people who are in a decent, committed, first marriage. Seems like most families today are second, third marriages with children having various step parents and half siblings. Seems to me that the Republicans are simply afraid of homosexuals and trying to pass hate legislation that denies rights to people. Isn't there something in the constitution about that?
  • Be on the right side of history for once
    We all know in our hearts and consciences that discrimation in any form is vile and that same sex marriage will one day be a national civil right. History will review the path it took to get there just as we have for the 1960's and the horrific years that we enslaved human beings. We should hope to be on the enlightened side of history, for a change, in Indiana.
  • backward, indeed
    Indiana made a great advance last year when it became the first state to have a license plate supporting an organization providing support for LGBT teens - and then our state's senate and house turned right around and reprimanded the organization and took the plates away (but not until I'd gotten two of them). I hope that better judgment prevails. I hope that steps can still be made toward equality - away from this pitiful homophobia. People are people, and the fact that we can love each other is a blessing. Shame on these legislators - two short-sighted men. I hope that this never even comes to a vote. But: I am a Hoosier. I am pro-equality. I am a democrat. And I vote.
  • Our State Legislature---
    ---the laughing stock of the country. Why don't they work on things that are important to our economy and needs and lay off their dumb ''social agendas''? Indiana is a backwards, bigoted, and holier than thou state who keeps voting in these idiots.
  • Shame
    Sorry to see this bigotry coming out of Hamilton County.
    This is why republicans are losing and losing big. As long as they focus on hate, bigotry, and sanctioning discrimination they will be the minority party. Sad time to be a Hoosier when are leaders are on the wrong side of history.
  • Ridulous
    This is such a waste of time. We should be pursuing the exact opposite and looking to legalize gay marriage.
  • Backwards Indiana
    Unbelievable, there are way too many other issues to concentrate on than this. The big corporations are against this so why would we pursue this.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.