IBJNews

Lilly braces for decline in Europe

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Austerity and upheaval in Europe have not hurt Eli Lilly and Co.’s $4 billion-a-year drug business there, but the company is moving forward with plans to survive a coming swoon anyway.

The Indianapolis-based drugmaker reported July 25 that its European sales rose 3 percent during the three months ended June 30, excluding the loss of sales for Zyprexa, Lilly’s former blockbuster which saw its European patents expire last fall.

Prices for Lilly’s products fell 3 percent in the quarter in Europe, where most drug prices are set by government-run health plans. Governments in Ireland, Italy, Greece and Spain all have had to enact spending reductions to deal with massive debt costs even as their economic growth has stagnated or declined. The government pullback has further exacerbated economic growth, and many say Europe has fallen back into recession.

“Historically, we've experienced a 1-percent to 2-percent price decline in Europe, so this 3-percent decline confirms that we've not seen significant new austerity measures that impact our products,” said Ilissa Rassner, Lilly’s director of investor relations, during a July 25 conference call with investors. She added that the private wholesalers Lilly uses to distribute its drugs have not fallen behind in paying their bills.

Even so, officials still see dark clouds over the European market. Consumers there account for 20 percent of Lilly’s global drugs sales, and cash-strapped governments will make it more difficult for the company to get favorable pricing and access to drug formularies, said Chief Financial Officer Derica Rice. A plethora of cheap, generic drugs also will take a toll on Lilly.

“While Europe will continue to be an important market for Lilly, we expect it to decline in value, driven by the difficult macroeconomic environment, faster generic erosion than in the past, and excessive hurdles for reimbursement and access of new products,” Rice told investors during the July 25 conference call.

In response, Lilly intends to reduce its number of locations and costs to operate in Europe.

“Specifically, we're simplifying the organization from 12 to five geographic hubs, giving us critical mass and delivering efficiencies across markets. In addition, we'll organize marketing medical, and other commercial support functions into pan-European therapeutic communities,” Rice said. “These changes will create a more focused organization, one able to respond effectively to customer needs.”

Rice declined to quantify how much Lilly could save with these changes, other than to say they will produce “substantial savings in the coming years.” However, Rice delighted analysts by saying that Lilly would reduce its worldwide selling, general and administrative expenses to no more than 30 percent in the few years after 2014.

Overhead expenses have been running at nearly 34 percent of revenue recently as Lilly deals with declining revenue from Zyprexa at the same time it has ramped up marketing efforts to generate new sales. That strategy has worked better than many Wall Street analysts expected. Lilly’s second quarter earnings per share were six cents higher than analysts predicted, and the company raised its full-year profit forecast by 10 cents to 15 cents per share.

In response, most analysts raised their long-term profit forecasts for Lilly, but some wondered whether the cost cuts will actually materialize—especially if Lilly fails to launch new products before then.

“We believe that cutting costs will be easier than growing revenues, and we remain cautious about revenue growth beyond 2014,” Alex Arfaei, a drug analyst at BMO Capital Markets, wrote in a July 27 research note.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.

  2. I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.

  3. Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??

  4. On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.

  5. It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.

ADVERTISEMENT