IBJNews

Luxury-outlet strategy puts Simon on top of mall industry

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Issa Khalil flew to Seattle last week to see his favorite football team, the Dallas Cowboys, play the Seahawks in their first home game of the season. He included a side trip: shopping at the Seattle Premium Outlets.

“We researched this place online,” said Khalil, 26, a Calgary resident who works in the hotel industry and plays in a men’s soccer league. He, his father and cousin were headed to Nike Inc.’s store to find shoes and “anything” else with the athletic-apparel maker’s signature Swoosh.

Shoppers like Khalil are helping to buoy growth for Indianapolis-based Simon Property Group Inc., which acquired the Seattle Premium Outlets through its $3.5 billion purchase of Chelsea Property Group in 2004.

Luxury outlet malls—where upscale retailers such as Coach Inc. and Michael Kors Holdings Ltd. hawk discount goods—are now the main source of expansion for the Indianapolis-based real estate investment trust, the country’s largest.

“The purchase of Chelsea by Simon eight years ago was arguably the best REIT merger ever,” said Cedrik Lachance, a managing director at real estate research firm Green Street Advisors Inc. in Newport Beach, California. “Outlet investing has been tremendously successful for Simon.”

The discount malls have helped make Simon the best-performing retail real estate stock of the past five years, and it’s a business that the No. 2 U.S. mall landlord, General Growth Properties Inc., doesn’t have. Hedge-fund manager Bill Ackman, whose Pershing Square Capital Management LP owns about 10 percent of General Growth, is lobbying for the companies to combine, even as Simon said last week that it has no interest in buying its rival.

Outlets were among several factors that Ackman highlighted in pushing for a deal.

“Simon’s dominant participation in the outlet mall business, in which GGP has no presence, has proven to be a retail real estate sector with a high degree of resilience during periods of economic weakness, and a significant contributor” to funds from operations, a measure of cash flow, Ackman said in an Aug. 27 letter to General Growth’s board.

In 2004, the year Simon bought Chelsea, General Growth spent $11.3 billion to buy Rouse Co., an owner of full-price malls and land for master-planned communities — a deal Simon passed up. The purchase was part of an acquisition spree that saddled Chicago-based General Growth with $27 billion of debt. When it couldn’t refinance the loans in 2009, the company became the biggest in real estate firm to file for bankruptcy.

Simon tried to buy General Growth when it was in bankruptcy. It lost to a group led by Ackman and Toronto-based Brookfield Asset Management Inc., which now owns about 42 percent of the company and said it has no plans to sell its stake. General Growth also said it won’t explore a sale.

Outlets make up about 12.5 percent of the gross leasable space of Simon’s properties worldwide. They represent about one-third of the company’s asset value, Lachance said. Simon operates 72 Premium Outlet Centers in 28 states and Puerto Rico, Asia and Mexico, with plans to open six more in 2013, including its first in Canada and Brazil.

Premium Outlets, which include more red-carpet designers than conventional outlet stores, have grown by exploiting consumers’ desire for brand-name fashion and household goods while meeting retailers’ needs to boost sales and pay lower rents during a time of sluggish economic growth.

“It’s a huge trend,” said Jeremy Moller, a retail broker at JSH Properties Inc. in Seattle. “After the crash, a lot of retailers realized they could sell only so many $600 bags.”

Discounts vary by retailer and product. At the Michael Kors outlet near Seattle, the popular Hamilton tote sells for $329, as little as 5 percent less than versions available on the designer’s website. Other products are more than half off, in some cases because it’s the end of the season. The Layton shoulder bag in Kors’s signature “luggage” color, a caramel brown, sells for $155, down from $368.

Outlet centers are cheaper to build and operate than traditional malls. Their out-of-the-way locations make them relatively easy to expand yet near enough to cities to attract customers. There was about 67.9 million square feet of outlet-center space last year, 23 percent more than a decade earlier, according to data from Value Retail News, a publication of the International Council of Shopping Centers.

Construction of traditional malls, primarily near urban areas, has been dormant because of little space for new development. Only one enclosed mall has opened in the U.S. since 2006, said Jesse Tron, a spokesman for the ICSC in New York.

“In terms of green field, or ground-up development, it’s pretty much all outlet centers,” said John Sheehan, an analyst at Edward Jones, in St. Louis.

Simon opened a $142.7 million outlet center in New Hampshire in June and construction has begun on three other outlet centers, two of which are in partnership with other developers, according to its latest quarterly report. The company has budgeted $750 million on U.S. expansion and redevelopment of existing properties in 2012, compared with $265 million last year.

The largest of Simon’s premium outlets by square footage is Woodbury Common, north of Manhattan. Woodbury Common Premium Outlets gets about 12 million visitors a year, making it the No. 1 tourist destination in the state outside of Manhattan, said Susan Hawvermale, director of tourism for Orange County, N.Y., where Woodbury Common is located. The outlet mall gets more than three times the annual visitors as the Empire State Building.

“It’s the best outlet in the world,” David Simon, CEO of Simon Property, said of Woodbury Common on an April 27 conference call with analysts. “What we’re thinking about doing there, working obviously closely with the town, but assuming we make progress and get some approvals there, I think we take that asset up to yet another level.”

Les Morris, a spokesman for Simon, declined to comment further.

Simon stopped breaking out financial results from Premium Outlets separately from its traditional mall business in 2009. In that year, the segment contributed 19.7 percent of net operating income. The company gained 21 more centers when it bought Prime Outlets Acquisition Co. in 2010 for $2.3 billion.

Simon stock has climbed 66 percent in the past five years while Greensboro, N.C.-based Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, the second-largest U.S. outlet owner, has jumped 63 percent, making them the best performers in Bloomberg’s regional mall index. General Growth tumbled 49 percent in that time.

“For both Simon and Tanger, the number of outlets and the profitability of outlets have gone up significantly,” said Stephen Waters, partner at Compass Advisers in New York, who advised Tanger in its 2005 purchase of a portfolio of outlets from Blackstone Group LP. “Sales per square foot at the best outlets are very high and rival those in conventional shopping malls.”

Other companies are trying to take away some of those sales. Santa Monica, Calif.-based Macerich Co., which entered the business last year when it bought Fashion Outlets of Niagara, is expanding that property and building a second called Fashion Outlets of Chicago that’s set to open in August 2013. Glimcher Realty Trust, based in Columbus, Ohio, in May announced a rebranding of its outlets as the “Outlet Collection” that will include renovations to its Jersey Gardens mall in Elizabeth, N.J., and redevelopment of its SuperMall in Auburn, Wash.

“Simon and Tanger are the very, very clear leaders in that category,” said Rich Moore, an analyst at RBC Capital Markets in Solon, Ohio. They will have the “majority of that business over the next five years,” he said.

For retailers, discount malls are a way to lure consumers after the recession. Nike, based in Beaverton, Ore., had 464 factory outlets in operation as of the end of May, out of 557 total branded stores, according to its annual report.

Michael Kors, which opened its first outlet in 2005 in Woodbury Common, now has 85 outlet stores, compared with 168 regular stores. Coach, the New York-based leather-goods maker, expects to open at least 30 North American stores in fiscal 2013, and at least 20 of those will be factory outlets, Chairman and CEO Lew Frankfort said on a July 31 earnings conference call.

Demand was on display last weekend at the Seattle outlets, where dozens queued outside the Coach store, prompting clerks to stagger entry. Workers handed out coupons for an additional 30 percent off to people waiting to join the throng inside snapping up handbags and key fobs.

“The reason it’s important to Simon is because it’s important to retailers,” Sheehan, the Edward Jones analyst, said of the outlet business. “They want to satisfy the demand.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT