IBJNews

NFP of NOTE: Momentive Consumer Credit Counseling Services

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Not-For-Profit of Note


Momentive Consumer Credit Counseling Services


615 N. Alabama St., Suite 134
Phone: (317) 266-1300; toll-free: (888) 711-7227
Fax: (317) 266-1315
Web site: www.momentive.org
Founded: 1964
Paid employees: 26
Highest-paid staff member: Kathryn Perron, president, $70,000
Top volunteers: Momentive does not use volunteers.

MISSION
                    
Change lives by helping people gain financial stability through education and counseling.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Chip McLean, chairman
Senghor Manns, treasurer
Ann Summer, secretary
Linda R. Carmody, past chairwoman
Michael Mackin
Andrew Mattingly
Mildred A. Motley
Curt Wiley

PROGRAMS

Budget counseling: helps families and individuals establish budgets, set financial goals, learn about savings and checking accounts
Debt management: sets up repayment programs with unsecured creditors, establishes lower monthly payments, allows repayment of entire debt in 60 months or less, provides an alternative to bankruptcy
Pre-filing bankruptcy counseling and education: as approved by the U.S. Department of Justice
Housing counseling: educates consumers before or after buying a home, or reverse mortgage, includes foreclosure prevention
Consumer credit: interprets reports, resolves disputes, or corrects reports to improve credit scores

FUND-RAISER

none


FINANCIAL PROFILE

2007 income: $1,643,343
2007 expenses: $1,689,955
2007 assets: $289,245

2008 projected income: $1,705,327
2008 projected expenses: $1,671,169
Fiscal year begins: Jan. 1

2007 income

Contributions: 32 percent
Grants: 33 percent
Fees: 35 percent

2007 expenses

Salaries and benefits: 61 percent
Rent/utilities: 29 percent
Supplies: 7 percent
Certification education: 3 percent

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT