IBJNews

Lugar: Obama failing on Brazil trade, cedes clout to China

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The top Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee said President Barack Obama is missing opportunities to strike closer ties with Brazil, allowing China to steal market share from U.S. companies in Latin America’s biggest economy.

In prepared remarks Senator Richard Lugar will deliver Friday in Washington, D.C., the Indiana Republican said the United States needs to elevate its relationship with Brazil to the status currently enjoyed by longstanding allies such as Canada, the United Kingdom and Australia.

“The U.S. agenda with Brazil should be much more ambitious,” according to Lugar’s speech to the Brazil-U.S. Business Council, an advanced copy of which was provided by his office. “We are missing important opportunities to advance our mutual interests.”

Brazil is helping anchor global economic growth as the country invests to host the 2014 soccer World Cup and 2016 Olympic Games, and as the state-run Petroleo Brasileiro SA develops the biggest offshore oil finds in the Americas in three decades. After expanding 7.5 percent in 2010, the central bank forecasts the $2.1 trillion Brazil economy will grow 3.5 percent this year.

While applauding Obama for making Brazil the centerpiece of his tour of Latin America earlier this year, Lugar said that more engagement is needed. A bilateral tax treaty — Brazil is the largest economy with which the U.S. lacks such an accord — and a market-access agreement with the Brazil and Argentina-led Mercosur trade bloc would help regain lost momentum, Lugar said.

“In too many cases, U.S. market share is being lost to China and other countries whose governments have moved more swiftly to embrace the opportunities of the Brazilian market,” Lugar said. “It’s critical to move now, not only because of competition from Asia and elsewhere, but because Brazil’s economic role in the hemisphere is expanding rapidly.”

National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor said Obama is committed to increasing U.S.-Brazil ties and that the U.S. was supporting Brazil’s desire to play a bigger role in organizations like the International Monetary Fund, World Bank and the Group of 20 nations.

Obama, speaking to a CEO business summit in Brasilia on March 19, said “It’s time for the United States to treat our engagement with Brazil on economic issues as seriously as we do with nations like China and India.´´

China overtook the U.S. as Brazil’s biggest trading partner in 2009 on stronger demand for the nation’s soybeans and iron ore. Still, exports of U.S. goods to Brazil have surged 22 percent so far this year, helping to pad a U.S. trade surplus with the country that stood at $9.7 billion through September.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Commies
    Damned if you do and damned if you don't...many Republican's want to do away with the Commerce Department. China's government must be evolved...oh the nasty Commies!
  • WHAT!
    Dicky needs to be quite, then maybe we the people won't remember that he has been sleep in Congress for the last 20m + years

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT