IBJNews

Lugar: Obama failing on Brazil trade, cedes clout to China

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The top Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee said President Barack Obama is missing opportunities to strike closer ties with Brazil, allowing China to steal market share from U.S. companies in Latin America’s biggest economy.

In prepared remarks Senator Richard Lugar will deliver Friday in Washington, D.C., the Indiana Republican said the United States needs to elevate its relationship with Brazil to the status currently enjoyed by longstanding allies such as Canada, the United Kingdom and Australia.

“The U.S. agenda with Brazil should be much more ambitious,” according to Lugar’s speech to the Brazil-U.S. Business Council, an advanced copy of which was provided by his office. “We are missing important opportunities to advance our mutual interests.”

Brazil is helping anchor global economic growth as the country invests to host the 2014 soccer World Cup and 2016 Olympic Games, and as the state-run Petroleo Brasileiro SA develops the biggest offshore oil finds in the Americas in three decades. After expanding 7.5 percent in 2010, the central bank forecasts the $2.1 trillion Brazil economy will grow 3.5 percent this year.

While applauding Obama for making Brazil the centerpiece of his tour of Latin America earlier this year, Lugar said that more engagement is needed. A bilateral tax treaty — Brazil is the largest economy with which the U.S. lacks such an accord — and a market-access agreement with the Brazil and Argentina-led Mercosur trade bloc would help regain lost momentum, Lugar said.

“In too many cases, U.S. market share is being lost to China and other countries whose governments have moved more swiftly to embrace the opportunities of the Brazilian market,” Lugar said. “It’s critical to move now, not only because of competition from Asia and elsewhere, but because Brazil’s economic role in the hemisphere is expanding rapidly.”

National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor said Obama is committed to increasing U.S.-Brazil ties and that the U.S. was supporting Brazil’s desire to play a bigger role in organizations like the International Monetary Fund, World Bank and the Group of 20 nations.

Obama, speaking to a CEO business summit in Brasilia on March 19, said “It’s time for the United States to treat our engagement with Brazil on economic issues as seriously as we do with nations like China and India.´´

China overtook the U.S. as Brazil’s biggest trading partner in 2009 on stronger demand for the nation’s soybeans and iron ore. Still, exports of U.S. goods to Brazil have surged 22 percent so far this year, helping to pad a U.S. trade surplus with the country that stood at $9.7 billion through September.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Commies
    Damned if you do and damned if you don't...many Republican's want to do away with the Commerce Department. China's government must be evolved...oh the nasty Commies!
  • WHAT!
    Dicky needs to be quite, then maybe we the people won't remember that he has been sleep in Congress for the last 20m + years

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. From the story: "The city of Indianapolis also will consider tax incentives and funding for infrastructure required for the project, according to IEDC." Why would the City need to consider additional tax incentives when Lowe's has already bought the land and reached an agreement with IEDC to bring the jobs? What that tells me is that the City has already pledged the incentives, unofficially, and they just haven't had time to push it through the MDC yet. Either way, subsidizing $10/hour jobs is going to do nothing toward furthering the Mayor's stated goal of attracting middle and upper-middle class residents to Marion County.

  2. Ron Spencer and the entire staff of Theater on the Square embraced IndyFringe when it came to Mass Ave in 2005. TOTS was not only a venue but Ron and his friends created, presented and appeared in shows which embraced the 'spirit of the fringe'. He's weathered all the storms and kept smiling ... bon voyage and thank you.

  3. Not sure how many sushi restaurants are enough, but there are three that I know of in various parts of downtown proper and all are pretty good.

  4. First off, it's "moron," not "moran." 2nd, YOU don't get to vote on someone else's rights and freedoms that are guaranteed by the US Constitution. That's why this is not a state's rights issue...putting something like this to vote by, well, people like you who are quite clearly intellectually challenged isn't necessary since the 14th amendment has already decided the issue. Which is why Indiana's effort is a wasted one and a waste of money...and will be overturned just like this has in every other state.

  5. Rick, how does granting theright to marry to people choosing to marry same-sex partners harm the lives of those who choose not to? I cannot for the life of me see any harm to people who choose not to marry someone of the same sex. We understand your choice to take the parts of the bible literally in your life. That is fine but why force your religious beliefs on others? I'm hoping the judges do the right thing and declare the ban unconstitutional so all citizens of Wisconsin and Indiana have the same marriage rights and that those who chose someone of the same sex do not have less rights than others.

ADVERTISEMENT