IBJNews

Purdue professor says ethanol consumption has its limits

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
On The Beat Industry News In Brief

Indiana’s dozen ethanol plants may struggle to find buyers of their corn-based fuel down the road.

The country simply won’t be able to consume more ethanol than is currently being produced, said Wally Tyner, a professor of agricultural economics at Purdue University.

Tyner just completed a study published in the American Journal of Agricultural Economics that concludes the United States is at the “blending wall,” or the saturation point, for ethanol use.

His findings don’t bode well for expectations under the federal Renewable Fuel Standard, which requires increasing renewable fuel production to 36 billion gallons by 2022.
 

otb-main-1col Indiana has 167 pumps dispensing E85 ethanol, according to the state’s Office of Energy Development. (IBJ File Photo)

Last year, 13 billion gallons were required—an amount Tyner concluded is the limit for consumption based on current infrastructure. Not only are there not enough flex-fuel vehicles that can burn the 85-percent ethanol blend, but there aren’t enough pumps out there.

“Even if you could produce a whole bunch of E85, there is no way to distribute it … . We would need to install about 2,000 pumps per year through 2022 to do it.”

Last year, federal regulators, in an effort to increase ethanol use, OK’d the blending of additional ethanol into ordinary gasoline for vehicles 2007 and newer: to 15 percent from the current 10 percent. But gasoline stations aren’t likely to make the expensive investment in new pumps to handle the more corrosive mixture anytime soon.

Last month, the Association of International Automobile Manufacturers filed suit in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in an attempt to block the higher concentration. The automaker group, along with boat and power-equipment makers, has warned that the higher concentration for non-85 vehicles could harm engines. However, it’s worth noting the AIAM trade group consists mostly of Japanese and Korean automakers, which have not built as many E85-capable vehicles as have American-based automakers.


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. something to take iman's mind off CART,,,the league itsownself doesn't do it

  2. Someone mentioned a green roof. Every designer of a new urban building should be required to at least explore the feasibility of a green roof. The ability to cut carbon dioxide, save precious rainwater (drought this summer??) and re-use grey water, cool the building cheaper, and improve the view for neighbors, should be, not only the good neighbor thing to do, it should be the responsible neighbor thing to do. Too bad the city didn't require it when they gave up downtown green space for the Simon Building. Surprised they aren't requiring it now.

  3. About the same means down, like the TV ratings.

    My favorite tradition that needs to be brought back is the 25/8 rule.

  4. Your stats are incorrect. The 85k Government employees working in Marion County includes all government workers in Marion county. That is state, federal, non profit agencies, city and county. The stats the article list is the number of employees for all of the city/county employees and it is correct. That number includes the library, airport, convention center, and so on. The policy of extending benefits to domestic partners is consistent with private sector companies of the same size. Isn't the mantra of most conservatives "run the government like a business."

    Also, too say the "fiscal proposil is huge" without considering the actuarial factors involved is a bit of an overstatement. We really don't know if it is huge or not. If all of the people added to the plan are healthy and don't have claims then it could bring cost done or hold them neutral.

  5. There are 85,346 government employees in Marion county according to Stats Indiana.

    My understanding is that this proposal covers not only same sex partners and children, but opposite same sex partners who are not married and any kids.

    It also covers all city and county employees, plus municipal corporations which use city/county benefits packages including Health and Hospital Corporation (Wishard), Indianapolis Airport Authority, Indianapolis Convention Center,Lucas Oil,Bankers Life, Indianapolis Marion County Library, and Indianapolis Public Transportation Corporation (IndyGo).

    Certainly Indianapolis Public Schools will also want more benefits also.

    The fiscal cost on this proposal is huge.

ADVERTISEMENT