IBJNews

Report: Brookfield plans bid for Simon target General Growth

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Brookfield Asset Management Inc. plans to bid for a stake in General Growth Properties Inc., beating an offer by Indianapolis-based Simon Property Group Inc. for the bankrupt shopping mall owner, the Wall Street Journal reported.

The bid would allow Chicago-based General Growth to exit Chapter 11 bankruptcy as a standalone company with Brookfield, the Toronto-based real estate investor, as its largest shareholder, the newspaper reported on its Web site, citing people familiar with the plan.

Simon, the largest U.S. shopping mall owner, has offered to purchase its biggest rival in a deal that would give equity investors about $9 a share and repay unsecured creditors in full. General Growth said the bid, made public on Feb. 16, was too low and would invite other potential buyers to make offers.

Brookfield owns almost $1 billion in General Growth debt, two people with knowledge of the company’s holdings said last week. General Growth may raise $1 billion to $2 billion from public markets—or more, were investor demand sufficient—to fund its exit from bankruptcy, according to one of the sources, who asked not to be named because the talks are private.

Brookfield would invest at least $2 billion, making the company the largest buyer in General Growth’s stock sale, the Journal said. Brookfield’s plan may be announced as soon as this week, the newspaper said.

Denis Couture, a Brookfield spokesman, declined to comment. David Keating, a spokesman for General Growth, said he had no immediate comment.

General Growth’s shares rallied past Simon’s buyout offer to close Monday at $12.76, signaling that investors expect a higher bid. William Ackman’s Pershing Square Capital Management LP, General Growth’s largest shareholder, in December issued a 54-page presentation that said the stock is worth $24 to $43. Pershing Square, based in New York, owns a 25 percent economic interest in General Growth, including 7.5 percent of its shares.

Based on the current valuations for U.S. mall owners and Simon and Brookfield’s “strong strategic and financial motivations,” General Growth is probably worth $11 to $18 a share, Green Street Advisors Inc., a Newport Beach, California- based research company, said in a Jan. 13 note.

General Growth, the owner of New York’s South Street Seaport and Boston’s Faneuil Hall, filed the biggest real-estate bankruptcy in U.S. history in April after amassing $27 billion in debt during an acquisition spree.

Brookfield said in a Feb. 19 letter to shareholders that it “acquired a substantial amount of defaulted bank debt issued by General Growth Properties” at a discount to par value. In a fourth-quarter earnings conference call that day, Brookfield Chief Executive Officer Bruce Flatt and other executives declined to discuss General Growth.

Flatt said in his Feb. 19 letter that Brookfield believes “acquiring assets through distress situations offers one of the few ways to acquire assets at meaningful discounts to their intrinsic value.”

Brookfield owns more than 100 office buildings; 2.9 million acres of timber and agricultural land in Canada, the U.S. and Brazil; apartment complexes; 20 shipping terminals in Europe and Australia; 164 hydroelectric plants; railroads in Australia; natural-gas pipelines in the U.S.; and a property-brokerage business with almost 40,000 brokers in about 2,000 offices in Canada, the U.S. and the U.K.

Brookfield last year assembled a $5 billion equity group to invest in distressed properties.

Blackstone Group LP, the world’s largest private-equity firm, may join Simon’s bid, two people with knowledge of the discussions said on Feb. 18. Blackstone is in preliminary talks with Simon, which would lead any resulting partnership.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT