IBJNews

Report: Brookfield plans bid for Simon target General Growth

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Brookfield Asset Management Inc. plans to bid for a stake in General Growth Properties Inc., beating an offer by Indianapolis-based Simon Property Group Inc. for the bankrupt shopping mall owner, the Wall Street Journal reported.

The bid would allow Chicago-based General Growth to exit Chapter 11 bankruptcy as a standalone company with Brookfield, the Toronto-based real estate investor, as its largest shareholder, the newspaper reported on its Web site, citing people familiar with the plan.

Simon, the largest U.S. shopping mall owner, has offered to purchase its biggest rival in a deal that would give equity investors about $9 a share and repay unsecured creditors in full. General Growth said the bid, made public on Feb. 16, was too low and would invite other potential buyers to make offers.

Brookfield owns almost $1 billion in General Growth debt, two people with knowledge of the company’s holdings said last week. General Growth may raise $1 billion to $2 billion from public markets—or more, were investor demand sufficient—to fund its exit from bankruptcy, according to one of the sources, who asked not to be named because the talks are private.

Brookfield would invest at least $2 billion, making the company the largest buyer in General Growth’s stock sale, the Journal said. Brookfield’s plan may be announced as soon as this week, the newspaper said.

Denis Couture, a Brookfield spokesman, declined to comment. David Keating, a spokesman for General Growth, said he had no immediate comment.

General Growth’s shares rallied past Simon’s buyout offer to close Monday at $12.76, signaling that investors expect a higher bid. William Ackman’s Pershing Square Capital Management LP, General Growth’s largest shareholder, in December issued a 54-page presentation that said the stock is worth $24 to $43. Pershing Square, based in New York, owns a 25 percent economic interest in General Growth, including 7.5 percent of its shares.

Based on the current valuations for U.S. mall owners and Simon and Brookfield’s “strong strategic and financial motivations,” General Growth is probably worth $11 to $18 a share, Green Street Advisors Inc., a Newport Beach, California- based research company, said in a Jan. 13 note.

General Growth, the owner of New York’s South Street Seaport and Boston’s Faneuil Hall, filed the biggest real-estate bankruptcy in U.S. history in April after amassing $27 billion in debt during an acquisition spree.

Brookfield said in a Feb. 19 letter to shareholders that it “acquired a substantial amount of defaulted bank debt issued by General Growth Properties” at a discount to par value. In a fourth-quarter earnings conference call that day, Brookfield Chief Executive Officer Bruce Flatt and other executives declined to discuss General Growth.

Flatt said in his Feb. 19 letter that Brookfield believes “acquiring assets through distress situations offers one of the few ways to acquire assets at meaningful discounts to their intrinsic value.”

Brookfield owns more than 100 office buildings; 2.9 million acres of timber and agricultural land in Canada, the U.S. and Brazil; apartment complexes; 20 shipping terminals in Europe and Australia; 164 hydroelectric plants; railroads in Australia; natural-gas pipelines in the U.S.; and a property-brokerage business with almost 40,000 brokers in about 2,000 offices in Canada, the U.S. and the U.K.

Brookfield last year assembled a $5 billion equity group to invest in distressed properties.

Blackstone Group LP, the world’s largest private-equity firm, may join Simon’s bid, two people with knowledge of the discussions said on Feb. 18. Blackstone is in preliminary talks with Simon, which would lead any resulting partnership.


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. something to take iman's mind off CART,,,the league itsownself doesn't do it

  2. Someone mentioned a green roof. Every designer of a new urban building should be required to at least explore the feasibility of a green roof. The ability to cut carbon dioxide, save precious rainwater (drought this summer??) and re-use grey water, cool the building cheaper, and improve the view for neighbors, should be, not only the good neighbor thing to do, it should be the responsible neighbor thing to do. Too bad the city didn't require it when they gave up downtown green space for the Simon Building. Surprised they aren't requiring it now.

  3. About the same means down, like the TV ratings.

    My favorite tradition that needs to be brought back is the 25/8 rule.

  4. Your stats are incorrect. The 85k Government employees working in Marion County includes all government workers in Marion county. That is state, federal, non profit agencies, city and county. The stats the article list is the number of employees for all of the city/county employees and it is correct. That number includes the library, airport, convention center, and so on. The policy of extending benefits to domestic partners is consistent with private sector companies of the same size. Isn't the mantra of most conservatives "run the government like a business."

    Also, too say the "fiscal proposil is huge" without considering the actuarial factors involved is a bit of an overstatement. We really don't know if it is huge or not. If all of the people added to the plan are healthy and don't have claims then it could bring cost done or hold them neutral.

  5. There are 85,346 government employees in Marion county according to Stats Indiana.

    My understanding is that this proposal covers not only same sex partners and children, but opposite same sex partners who are not married and any kids.

    It also covers all city and county employees, plus municipal corporations which use city/county benefits packages including Health and Hospital Corporation (Wishard), Indianapolis Airport Authority, Indianapolis Convention Center,Lucas Oil,Bankers Life, Indianapolis Marion County Library, and Indianapolis Public Transportation Corporation (IndyGo).

    Certainly Indianapolis Public Schools will also want more benefits also.

    The fiscal cost on this proposal is huge.

ADVERTISEMENT