Report: State must cut spending, hike taxes or both

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

State officials next year will have to make more spending cuts, increase taxes or both as they face the most challenging fiscal outlook in 30 years.

Those were the conclusions of an Indiana Fiscal Policy Institute report released Thursday detailing the impact of the recession on the two-year budget that goes into effect July 1, 2011.

Dwindling tax revenues will cause a projected $1.3 billion budget gap as the state enters its next budget, which would have an estimated spending base of $14.6 billion, according to the report.

That deficit equals the amount needed to pay for government functions such as prisons, police, parks and the General Assembly—essentially everything but education and social services.

To make up the gap, the state will have to look at increasing sales or income taxes, eliminating services or a combination of both, said John Ketzenberger, the Indiana Fiscal Policy Institute’s president.

“Their only choices are to make cuts and hope that the economy grows enough that cuts and growth offset the deficit—and there’s really no sign the economy is going to grow at a rate that’s enough to make that happen—or make cuts and look at increasing revenues through taxes,” Ketzenberger said.

Gov. Mitch Daniels’ administration refuted the notion that tax increases could be needed.

“We’ve proven time and again we will make the reforms and decisions required to live within our means and keep Indiana in the black without raising taxes,” Chris Ruhl, the director of the state's Office of Management and Budget said in a statement.  “We are leading the nation in recovering lost jobs in large part because we did not raise taxes while other states did. The Institute’s suggestion of a general tax increase on Hoosiers is a terrible and unnecessary idea and one the governor firmly opposes.”

The state has faced tough economic times for the last two years in the midst of a long-lasting recession. A high unemployment rate—now at more than 10 percent—and slow gross domestic product growth have made sales and income tax revenues volatile.

That’s a problem, the report says, because those two taxes make up 80 percent of Indiana’s revenue.

The result is apparent: The state’s revenue collections in 2010 were more than $900 million less than in 2008.

Indiana House Speaker B. Patrick Bauer said the report highlights the challenge Indiana faces.

"Now that we see the results of a study by an independent group of fiscal experts, the public can see that Indiana is not the island of prosperity that the governor has continually talked about these past few years," Bauer, D-South Bend, said in a prepared statement.

In the last few years, a $2.7-billion boost from federal stimulus programs and about $3 billion in spending reductions by Daniels’ administration helped the state survive the losses.

The stimulus and many of the governor’s tactics, however, aren’t sustainable. And the economy is hardly expected to rebound next year.

That means the next budget, according to the report, will require “some creative thinking and tactics.”

If there is good news in the report, it’s that Indiana is hardly alone. The national Center on Budget and Policy Priorities reports that 46 states faced shortfalls in their 2009 or 2010 budgets.

Compared with states such as Illinois, Ketzenberger said, Indiana is faring well.

“But tough times are on us,” he said.


  • handbagsonsales.com
    very well very well
  • saç ekimi
    it is good luck . it is very good very good.
  • x
  • That Man Mitch
    That man Mitch has been saying Indiana is doing great. The stimulus money Mitch pocketed rather than use it to add to the economy. Will the legislatures take a drastic paycut until the economy recovers. The General Assembly is a big hog, not to metion the Governor's office. Are we still funding Mitch to live elsewhere other than in the Governor's mansion?
  • Easy to fix
    Cut spending on education (we spend way too much) and social services.

    Stimulus? The Fed Govt thinks it can continue to spend $4Trillion and take in $2.5T in taxes. Is there any politician out there that is willing to say THE FREE RIDE IS OVER? No. So we are doomed.
  • Cut spending
    This is not a "budget" problem. A budget is a projected level of income vs. expenses and is not reality. It is time for checkbook accounting using what is reality and not what is merely a hope. You/the State can't spend it if it isn't in the bank and no check bouncing. Same thing applies to various depts. If they don't have it they can't spend it. That is how the citizens of this State must manage their funds and survival. The people in both State & Federal gov't positions think the taxpayers are bottomless pits of money.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So as I read this the one question that continues to come to me to ask is. Didn't Indiana only have a couple of exchanges for people to opt into which were very high because we really didn't want to expect the plan. So was this study done during that time and if so then I can understand these numbers. I also understand that we have now opened up for more options for hoosiers to choose from. Please correct if I'm wrong and if I'm not why was this not part of the story so that true overview could be taken away and not just parts of it to continue this negative tone against the ACA. I look forward to the clarity.

  2. It's really very simple. All forms of transportation are subsidized. All of them. Your tax money already goes toward every single form of transportation in the state. It is not a bad thing to put tax money toward mass transit. The state spends over 1,000,000,000 (yes billion) on roadway expansions and maintenance every single year. If you want to cry foul over anything cry foul over the overbuilding of highways which only serve people who can afford their own automobile.

  3. So instead of subsidizing a project with a market-driven scope, you suggest we subsidize a project that is way out of line with anything that can be economically sustainable just so we can have a better-looking skyline?

  4. Downtowner, if Cummins isn't getting expedited permitting and tax breaks to "do what they do", then I'd be happy with letting the market decide. But that isn't the case, is it?

  5. Patty, this commuter line provides a way for workers (willing to work lower wages) to get from Marion county to Hamilton county. These people are running your restaurants, hotels, hospitals, and retail stores. I don't see a lot of residents of Carmel working these jobs.