SHOBERT: Indiana continues to mind the store

Benjamin A. Shobert
February 19, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Benjamin ShobertIn mid-January, United Van Lines released its annual study of migration patterns across the United States. The resulting map paints an interesting picture: States in yellow are those they define as “high outbound” (where more people are moving out than in), those in blue are the opposite, and those in white are neutral, where the population has been stable.

Perhaps it’s no surprise that Indiana is one of the stable states, but what may come as a bit of a shock is that Indiana appears to be floating in a sea of yellow, with almost every one of the neighboring states, except Kentucky, indicating more people outbound than inbound. Michigan? Yellow. Ohio? Yellow. Illinois? Yellow.

Well, maybe that last one shouldn’t come as a surprise, given the mid-January passage of a 66-percent personal income tax increase and 46-percent business-tax-rate increase from the cash-strapped state government. Regardless of our respective political differences, these two facts should give every Hoosier a sense of pride in what has been built (or, some might say, what hasn’t been built) here in the seat of Indiana’s government, Indianapolis. Indiana now enjoys a meaningful comparative advantage relative to its surrounding states, one that is likely to grow only more attractive to new businesses if other Midwestern states find themselves in similar positions as Illinois, with declining tax revenue and increasing spending obligations.

Many local business and thought leaders have wrestled with the questions of what Indiana needs to do in order to be considered more seriously by expanding businesses, or what the state should try to do to prevent the entrepreneurial brain drain from our universities. And for all the angst that many have felt over not having great answers to these questions, Indiana has managed to quietly foster an answer that is entirely consistent with our values: good fiscal government.

The result of this sort of base-running versus swinging for the fences may not find Indiana playing host to Google or the next great biotechnology industry. But a stable state with attractive personal and business tax rates will—at a minimum—drive labor-sensitive businesses to look more seriously at Indiana. Look around the state and it’s easy to find pent-up industrial know-how, the sort of capabilities other states simply cannot match. And, to paraphrase Tom Cruise in the movie, “The Firm,” manufacturing “may not be sexy, but it’s got teeth!”

For some, these sorts of industries are too old-school to drive the new economy. And while the criticism is legitimate, Indiana’s current strengths lie in embracing a vision of our future that is authentic to what we do truly better than others, while not shutting the door on exploratory efforts to cultivate higher-technology startups.

These are delicate matters, because some of the things that characterize Indiana can’t be changed. After all, our topography and climate really aren’t up for adjusting. But what we can do is stay true to what we are and what we aren’t, and in doing so, foster an environment of stability, something business very much desires.

Perhaps most important, Indiana’s current fiscal position points a way forward, illuminating what the next decade of good government, and good partnership between municipalities and businesses, should look like—not only at a regional level, but for the nation as a whole as well.

As Gov. Daniels’ second and final term comes to an end, business and policymakers need to pay attention to what Indiana has going for it: good government that understands its limitations, seeks to ensure its fiscal stability, and empowers business to worry about everything other than double-digit increases in taxes.•


Shobert is managing director of Teleos Inc., a local firm specializing in taking products and technologies to market.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
thisissue1-092914.jpg 092914

Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Cramer agrees...says don't buy it and sell it if you own it! Their "pay to play" cost is this issue. As long as they charge customers, they never will attain the critical mass needed to be a successful on company...Jim Cramer quote.

  2. My responses to some of the comments would include the following: 1. Our offer which included the forgiveness of debt (this is an immediate forgiveness and is not "spread over many years")represents debt that due to a reduction of interest rates in the economy arguably represents consideration together with the cash component of our offer that exceeds the $2.1 million apparently offered by another party. 2. The previous $2.1 million cash offer that was turned down by the CRC would have netted the CRC substantially less than $2.1 million. As a result even in hindsight the CRC was wise in turning down that offer. 3. With regard to "concerned Carmelite's" discussion of the previous financing Pedcor gave up $16.5 million in City debt in addition to the conveyance of the garage (appraised at $13 million)in exchange for the $22.5 million cash and debt obligations. The local media never discussed the $16.5 million in debt that we gave up which would show that we gave $29.5 million in value for the $23.5 million. 4.Pedcor would have been much happier if Brian was still operating his Deli and only made this offer as we believe that we can redevelop the building into something that will be better for the City and City Center where both Pedcor the citizens of Carmel have a large investment. Bruce Cordingley, President, Pedcor

  3. I've been looking for news on Corner Bakery, too, but there doesn't seem to be any info out there. I prefer them over Panera and Paradise so can't wait to see where they'll be!

  4. WGN actually is two channels: 1. WGN Chicago, seen only in Chicago (and parts of Canada) - this station is one of the flagship CW affiliates. 2. WGN America - a nationwide cable channel that doesn't carry any CW programming, and doesn't have local affiliates. (In addition, as WGN is owned by Tribune, just like WTTV, WTTK, and WXIN, I can't imagine they would do anything to help WISH.) In Indianapolis, CW programming is already seen on WTTV 4 and WTTK 29, and when CBS takes over those stations' main channels, the CW will move to a sub channel, such as 4.2 or 4.3 and 29.2 or 29.3. TBS is only a cable channel these days and does not affiliate with local stations. WISH could move the MyNetwork affiliation from WNDY 23 to WISH 8, but I am beginning to think they may prefer to put together their own lineup of syndicated programming instead. While much of it would be "reruns" from broadcast or cable, that's pretty much what the MyNetwork does these days anyway. So since WISH has the choice, they may want to customize their lineup by choosing programs that they feel will garner better ratings in this market.

  5. The Pedcor debt is from the CRC paying ~$23M for the Pedcor's parking garage at City Center that is apprased at $13M. Why did we pay over the top money for a private businesses parking? What did we get out of it? Pedcor got free parking for their apartment and business tenants. Pedcor now gets another building for free that taxpayers have ~$3M tied up in. This is NOT a win win for taxpayers. It is just a win for Pedcor who contributes heavily to the Friends of Jim Brainard. The campaign reports are on the Hamilton County website. http://www2.hamiltoncounty.in.gov/publicdocs/Campaign%20Finance%20Images/defaultfiles.asp?ARG1=Campaign Finance Images&ARG2=/Brainard, Jim