IBJNews

Simon Property Group cranks up bid for General Growth

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Simon Property Group Inc. made a new offer for rival General Growth Properties Inc., pledging to invest $2.5 billion in a reorganization and match the terms of a bankruptcy exit plan led by Brookfield Asset Management Inc.

The proposal includes a $1 billion co-investment commitment by hedge fund Paulson & Co., Indianapolis-based Simon said in a statement Wednesday. Simon CEO David Simon said his offer is better for General Growth shareholders than the Brookfield plan because it doesn’t include the issuance of warrants that may reduce value.

Simon, the largest U.S. mall owner, said it’s still willing to buy General Growth, the second-biggest, outright. General Growth, based in Chicago, turned down a $10 billion takeover bid by Simon in February, saying it was too low. The companies have been in discussions since, unable to come to an agreement over how much risk each should take should there be any antitrust problems from a takeover, said a person familiar with the talks.

“David Simon is saying, ‘Fine, if you’re not going to negotiate in good faith, I’m going to do the same deal but I’ll do it at better terms,’” David Fick, an analyst with Stifel Nicolaus & Co. in Baltimore, said. “It’s all posturing. You still will have the same outcome. It will be bought by Simon at the end of the day.”

General Growth shares fell 14 cents, to $16.01 each in afternoon trading. Simon shares slipped 45 cents, to $87.73.

General Growth, after turning down Simon initial offer, instead announced plans to reorganize under a $6.55 billion plan by Brookfield, Pershing Square Capital Management LP and Fairholme Capital Management LLC. General Growth would emerge from bankruptcy as an independent company under both the Brookfield plan and Simon’s new offer.

Simon would buy 250 million shares at $10 each under the new offer, which it said is the same amount Toronto-based Brookfield would acquire under its plan, and at the same price. It would also agree to the same terms as Brookfield’s proposal for the recapitalization of the company and planned spinoff of a new entity, David Simon wrote in a letter to General Growth CEO Adam Metz that was included in the statement.

The removal of warrants would provide shareholders a benefit of at least $895 million, or $2.75 a share, Simon said.

General Growth’s shareholders “would accordingly not suffer the dilution contemplated by the Brookfield investment, and their ongoing interest in GGP would be substantially more valuable,” Simon said in the letter.

David Keating, a spokesman for General Growth, declined to comment. General Growth lawyer Gary Holtzer, and Michael Stamer, a lawyer for General Growth creditors, didn’t return calls for comment.

“GGP has always been a premium shopping mall operator,” New York-based Paulson & Co. said in a statement. “Paulson & Co.’s $1 billion investment as part of Simon Property Group’s proposal will allow GGP to deleverage its balance sheet and exit bankruptcy with the right capital structure to pursue its long-term strategy.”

imon said it’s willing to partner with Fairholme and Pershing Square as long as they forego the warrants they would receive under their agreement with Brookfield and General Growth. There also are “a number of alternative sources of capital” who are interested in partnering on a General Growth investment instead, David Simon said.

Pershing Square, led by William Ackman, is General Growth’s biggest equity investor, with a 25-percent economic interest, including 7.5 percent of its shares. Bruce Berkowitz’s Fairholme is the largest creditor, with about $1.83 billion of General Growth’s unsecured debt, Berkowitz and Ackman said in a letter filed March 9 with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission.

Katherine Vyse, a spokeswoman for Brookfield, declined to comment. Ackman also declined to comment. Hedda Nadler, a spokeswoman for Fairholme, didn’t return a call seeking comment.

General Growth filed the largest real estate bankruptcy in U.S. history last April after amassing $27 billion in debt making acquisitions. Its properties include New York’s South Street Seaport and Boston’s Faneuil Hall.



 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Corporate Citizenship
    Plenty of money to purchase Circle Center Mall and take the CIB/taxpayers off the hook.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. With Pence running the ship good luck with a new government building on the site. He does everything on the cheap except unnecessary roads line a new beltway( like we need that). Things like state of the art office buildings and light rail will never be seen as an asset to these types. They don't get that these are the things that help a city prosper.

  2. Does the $100,000,000,000 include salaries for members of Congress?

  3. "But that doesn't change how the piece plays to most of the people who will see it." If it stands out so little during the day as you seem to suggest maybe most of the people who actually see it will be those present when it is dark enough to experience its full effects.

  4. That's the mentality of most retail marketers. In this case Leo was asked to build the brand. HHG then had a bad sales quarter and rather than stay the course, now want to go back to the schlock that Zimmerman provides (at a considerable cut in price.) And while HHG salesmen are, by far, the pushiest salesmen I have ever experienced, I believe they are NOT paid on commission. But that doesn't mean they aren't trained to be aggressive.

  5. The reason HHG's sales team hits you from the moment you walk through the door is the same reason car salesmen do the same thing: Commission. HHG's folks are paid by commission they and need to hit sales targets or get cut, while BB does not. The sales figures are aggressive, so turnover rate is high. Electronics are the largest commission earners along with non-needed warranties, service plans etc, known in the industry as 'cheese'. The wholesale base price is listed on the cryptic price tag in the string of numbers near the bar code. Know how to decipher it and you get things at cost, with little to no commission to the sales persons. Whether or not this is fair, is more of a moral question than a financial one.

ADVERTISEMENT