IBJNews

Simon Property Group cranks up bid for General Growth

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Simon Property Group Inc. made a new offer for rival General Growth Properties Inc., pledging to invest $2.5 billion in a reorganization and match the terms of a bankruptcy exit plan led by Brookfield Asset Management Inc.

The proposal includes a $1 billion co-investment commitment by hedge fund Paulson & Co., Indianapolis-based Simon said in a statement Wednesday. Simon CEO David Simon said his offer is better for General Growth shareholders than the Brookfield plan because it doesn’t include the issuance of warrants that may reduce value.

Simon, the largest U.S. mall owner, said it’s still willing to buy General Growth, the second-biggest, outright. General Growth, based in Chicago, turned down a $10 billion takeover bid by Simon in February, saying it was too low. The companies have been in discussions since, unable to come to an agreement over how much risk each should take should there be any antitrust problems from a takeover, said a person familiar with the talks.

“David Simon is saying, ‘Fine, if you’re not going to negotiate in good faith, I’m going to do the same deal but I’ll do it at better terms,’” David Fick, an analyst with Stifel Nicolaus & Co. in Baltimore, said. “It’s all posturing. You still will have the same outcome. It will be bought by Simon at the end of the day.”

General Growth shares fell 14 cents, to $16.01 each in afternoon trading. Simon shares slipped 45 cents, to $87.73.

General Growth, after turning down Simon initial offer, instead announced plans to reorganize under a $6.55 billion plan by Brookfield, Pershing Square Capital Management LP and Fairholme Capital Management LLC. General Growth would emerge from bankruptcy as an independent company under both the Brookfield plan and Simon’s new offer.

Simon would buy 250 million shares at $10 each under the new offer, which it said is the same amount Toronto-based Brookfield would acquire under its plan, and at the same price. It would also agree to the same terms as Brookfield’s proposal for the recapitalization of the company and planned spinoff of a new entity, David Simon wrote in a letter to General Growth CEO Adam Metz that was included in the statement.

The removal of warrants would provide shareholders a benefit of at least $895 million, or $2.75 a share, Simon said.

General Growth’s shareholders “would accordingly not suffer the dilution contemplated by the Brookfield investment, and their ongoing interest in GGP would be substantially more valuable,” Simon said in the letter.

David Keating, a spokesman for General Growth, declined to comment. General Growth lawyer Gary Holtzer, and Michael Stamer, a lawyer for General Growth creditors, didn’t return calls for comment.

“GGP has always been a premium shopping mall operator,” New York-based Paulson & Co. said in a statement. “Paulson & Co.’s $1 billion investment as part of Simon Property Group’s proposal will allow GGP to deleverage its balance sheet and exit bankruptcy with the right capital structure to pursue its long-term strategy.”

imon said it’s willing to partner with Fairholme and Pershing Square as long as they forego the warrants they would receive under their agreement with Brookfield and General Growth. There also are “a number of alternative sources of capital” who are interested in partnering on a General Growth investment instead, David Simon said.

Pershing Square, led by William Ackman, is General Growth’s biggest equity investor, with a 25-percent economic interest, including 7.5 percent of its shares. Bruce Berkowitz’s Fairholme is the largest creditor, with about $1.83 billion of General Growth’s unsecured debt, Berkowitz and Ackman said in a letter filed March 9 with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission.

Katherine Vyse, a spokeswoman for Brookfield, declined to comment. Ackman also declined to comment. Hedda Nadler, a spokeswoman for Fairholme, didn’t return a call seeking comment.

General Growth filed the largest real estate bankruptcy in U.S. history last April after amassing $27 billion in debt making acquisitions. Its properties include New York’s South Street Seaport and Boston’s Faneuil Hall.



 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Corporate Citizenship
    Plenty of money to purchase Circle Center Mall and take the CIB/taxpayers off the hook.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The east side does have potential...and I have always thought Washington Scare should become an outlet mall. Anyone remember how popular Eastgate was? Well, Indy has no outlet malls, we have to go to Edinburgh for the deep discounts and I don't understand why. Jim is right. We need a few good eastsiders interested in actually making some noise and trying to change the commerce, culture and stereotypes of the East side. Irvington is very progressive and making great strides, why can't the far east side ride on their coat tails to make some changes?

  2. Boston.com has an article from 2010 where they talk about how Interactions moved to Massachusetts in the year prior. http://www.boston.com/business/technology/innoeco/2010/07/interactions_banks_63_million.html The article includes a link back to that Inside Indiana Business press release I linked to earlier, snarkily noting, "Guess this 2006 plan to create 200-plus new jobs in Indiana didn't exactly work out."

  3. I live on the east side and I have read all your comments. a local paper just did an article on Washington square mall with just as many comments and concerns. I am not sure if they are still around, but there was an east side coalition with good intentions to do good things on the east side. And there is a facebook post that called my eastside indy with many old members of the eastside who voice concerns about the east side of the city. We need to come together and not just complain and moan, but come up with actual concrete solutions, because what Dal said is very very true- the eastside could be a goldmine in the right hands. But if anyone is going damn, and change things, it is us eastside residents

  4. Please go back re-read your economics text book and the fine print on the February 2014 CBO report. A minimum wage increase has never resulted in a net job loss...

  5. The GOP at the Statehouse is more interested in PR to keep their majority, than using it to get anything good actually done. The State continues its downward spiral.

ADVERTISEMENT