IBJNews

Simon Property Group cranks up bid for General Growth

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Simon Property Group Inc. made a new offer for rival General Growth Properties Inc., pledging to invest $2.5 billion in a reorganization and match the terms of a bankruptcy exit plan led by Brookfield Asset Management Inc.

The proposal includes a $1 billion co-investment commitment by hedge fund Paulson & Co., Indianapolis-based Simon said in a statement Wednesday. Simon CEO David Simon said his offer is better for General Growth shareholders than the Brookfield plan because it doesn’t include the issuance of warrants that may reduce value.

Simon, the largest U.S. mall owner, said it’s still willing to buy General Growth, the second-biggest, outright. General Growth, based in Chicago, turned down a $10 billion takeover bid by Simon in February, saying it was too low. The companies have been in discussions since, unable to come to an agreement over how much risk each should take should there be any antitrust problems from a takeover, said a person familiar with the talks.

“David Simon is saying, ‘Fine, if you’re not going to negotiate in good faith, I’m going to do the same deal but I’ll do it at better terms,’” David Fick, an analyst with Stifel Nicolaus & Co. in Baltimore, said. “It’s all posturing. You still will have the same outcome. It will be bought by Simon at the end of the day.”

General Growth shares fell 14 cents, to $16.01 each in afternoon trading. Simon shares slipped 45 cents, to $87.73.

General Growth, after turning down Simon initial offer, instead announced plans to reorganize under a $6.55 billion plan by Brookfield, Pershing Square Capital Management LP and Fairholme Capital Management LLC. General Growth would emerge from bankruptcy as an independent company under both the Brookfield plan and Simon’s new offer.

Simon would buy 250 million shares at $10 each under the new offer, which it said is the same amount Toronto-based Brookfield would acquire under its plan, and at the same price. It would also agree to the same terms as Brookfield’s proposal for the recapitalization of the company and planned spinoff of a new entity, David Simon wrote in a letter to General Growth CEO Adam Metz that was included in the statement.

The removal of warrants would provide shareholders a benefit of at least $895 million, or $2.75 a share, Simon said.

General Growth’s shareholders “would accordingly not suffer the dilution contemplated by the Brookfield investment, and their ongoing interest in GGP would be substantially more valuable,” Simon said in the letter.

David Keating, a spokesman for General Growth, declined to comment. General Growth lawyer Gary Holtzer, and Michael Stamer, a lawyer for General Growth creditors, didn’t return calls for comment.

“GGP has always been a premium shopping mall operator,” New York-based Paulson & Co. said in a statement. “Paulson & Co.’s $1 billion investment as part of Simon Property Group’s proposal will allow GGP to deleverage its balance sheet and exit bankruptcy with the right capital structure to pursue its long-term strategy.”

imon said it’s willing to partner with Fairholme and Pershing Square as long as they forego the warrants they would receive under their agreement with Brookfield and General Growth. There also are “a number of alternative sources of capital” who are interested in partnering on a General Growth investment instead, David Simon said.

Pershing Square, led by William Ackman, is General Growth’s biggest equity investor, with a 25-percent economic interest, including 7.5 percent of its shares. Bruce Berkowitz’s Fairholme is the largest creditor, with about $1.83 billion of General Growth’s unsecured debt, Berkowitz and Ackman said in a letter filed March 9 with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission.

Katherine Vyse, a spokeswoman for Brookfield, declined to comment. Ackman also declined to comment. Hedda Nadler, a spokeswoman for Fairholme, didn’t return a call seeking comment.

General Growth filed the largest real estate bankruptcy in U.S. history last April after amassing $27 billion in debt making acquisitions. Its properties include New York’s South Street Seaport and Boston’s Faneuil Hall.



 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Corporate Citizenship
    Plenty of money to purchase Circle Center Mall and take the CIB/taxpayers off the hook.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. From the story: "The city of Indianapolis also will consider tax incentives and funding for infrastructure required for the project, according to IEDC." Why would the City need to consider additional tax incentives when Lowe's has already bought the land and reached an agreement with IEDC to bring the jobs? What that tells me is that the City has already pledged the incentives, unofficially, and they just haven't had time to push it through the MDC yet. Either way, subsidizing $10/hour jobs is going to do nothing toward furthering the Mayor's stated goal of attracting middle and upper-middle class residents to Marion County.

  2. Ron Spencer and the entire staff of Theater on the Square embraced IndyFringe when it came to Mass Ave in 2005. TOTS was not only a venue but Ron and his friends created, presented and appeared in shows which embraced the 'spirit of the fringe'. He's weathered all the storms and kept smiling ... bon voyage and thank you.

  3. Not sure how many sushi restaurants are enough, but there are three that I know of in various parts of downtown proper and all are pretty good.

  4. First off, it's "moron," not "moran." 2nd, YOU don't get to vote on someone else's rights and freedoms that are guaranteed by the US Constitution. That's why this is not a state's rights issue...putting something like this to vote by, well, people like you who are quite clearly intellectually challenged isn't necessary since the 14th amendment has already decided the issue. Which is why Indiana's effort is a wasted one and a waste of money...and will be overturned just like this has in every other state.

  5. Rick, how does granting theright to marry to people choosing to marry same-sex partners harm the lives of those who choose not to? I cannot for the life of me see any harm to people who choose not to marry someone of the same sex. We understand your choice to take the parts of the bible literally in your life. That is fine but why force your religious beliefs on others? I'm hoping the judges do the right thing and declare the ban unconstitutional so all citizens of Wisconsin and Indiana have the same marriage rights and that those who chose someone of the same sex do not have less rights than others.

ADVERTISEMENT