IBJNews

State lawmakers to take on unemployment insurance

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Businesses with a history of laying off employees would pay more in unemployment insurance costs, and workers in industries where layoffs occur regularly would receive lower benefits under a bill Indiana lawmakers are preparing to take up.

Rep. Dan Leonard, R-Huntington, the author of House Bill 1450, said the measure aimed at fixing the state's insolvent unemployment system is fair because it costs more for companies that lay off employees the most often and includes a formula to ensure that people who earn the same salary receive the same unemployment benefits.

"This makes things a little fairer," he said.

Leonard said the bill would not change unemployment benefits the typical out-of-work person receives.

The bill tries to address three problems with the state's unemployment insurance system: a $2 billion debt to the federal government, interest on that debt and fixing the system so it is fiscally sound in the future. The first committee hearing on the bill is scheduled for Tuesday.

The Legislature has been working on fixing the unemployment insurance system since voting in 2009 to raise employers' premiums. That was supposed to happen last year, but lawmakers put off the increase for a year because of the recession. Those changes go into effect this year.

That fix, however, didn't specify who would pay back the $60 million to $70 million a year interest on the debt. Lawmakers say by law that federal regulations don't allow the interest to be paid off directly through the unemployment insurance fund.

The bill being considered by the House would lengthen the amount of time it would take to repay the debt, reducing the cost to employers, but add a surcharge to those companies to pay off the interest. Lawmakers say most businesses will pay about the same each year as they would have under the bill passed in 2009. Some businesses that have a history of laying off employees will see a bigger increase.

Under the plan, Indiana's unemployment system should be solvent by 2020.

Kevin Brinegar, president of the Indiana Chamber of Commerce, said although he hopes to see some minor changes in the bill, he called the legislation was good overall considering the situation, calling it a "lose-lose for everybody because of the deficit we have."

"We think this will add stability to the system and get us through this difficult period," he said.

Leonard said the bill would soften the blow on employers compared to the bill passed in 2009, saying he hopes it might lead to more people being hired.

The bill also would make changes in how much in weekly unemployment insurance some people would receive. Currently, two people paid $30,000 a year can receive starkly different unemployment benefits — as much as $190 a week — depending on how many weeks they worked. The bill would give the same benefit to people who earn the same amount annually.

Indiana State AFL-CIO president Nancy Guyott called the measure disappointing, saying she believes the bill would affect most hourly workers who become unemployed.

"Most hourly workers have fluctuations in the number of hours that they work over time and anybody in that situation would have reduced benefits," she said.

Leonard said the bill also would eliminate unemployment benefits for people who work at plants where there are regularly scheduled shutdowns for reasons such as retooling.

Senate Tax Chairman Brandt Hershman, R-Monticello, said the bill strikes a responsible balance between impact on employers and employees.

"It's a very difficult challenge to address, particularly in this economy," he said. "It's a difficult problem to solve."

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT