Steak n Shake slashes restaurant spending as CEO hoards cash

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Steak n Shake Co. spent $545 million from 1999 to 2008 to add dozens of restaurants and buy new equipment for existing ones. That worked out to $55 million a year in so-called capital expenditures.

In 2009, the locally based burger chain spent just $5.8 million.

The drastic cut in restaurant investments is the biggest reason Steak n Shake is profitable again and sitting on $51 million in cash, up from just $7 million at the start of the year.


Steak n Shake CEO Sardar Biglari says the investments by previous executives failed to generate a return for the company’s shareholders despite helping Steak n Shake boost annual revenue from $350 million to $627 million.

Biglari instead has opted to stockpile cash and scout investment opportunities outside of Steak n Shake. The company agreed in October to acquire steak chain Western Sizzlin and in December made an unsolicited bid for a Michigan insurance company.

Restaurant experts and financial advisers say the moves carry heavy risks for the 75-year-old restaurant chain founded in Normal, Ill. They say Steak n Shake could fall behind its competitors and lose market share as Biglari turns his attention—and the chain’s cash flow—elsewhere.

Steak n Shake CEO Sardar Biglari is spending much less than his predecessors on new restaurants and improvements to existing ones. (IBJ File Photo)

“Without question, it’s a strategy to make the numbers look better,” said Steve Huse, a former Steak n Shake executive who now owns 38 Arby’s restaurants in the Midwest and St. Elmo Steak House downtown. “You can delay capital expenditures, but you can’t ignore it for a longer period of time.”

Greener pastures

Steak n Shake risks becoming irrelevant as it faces well-funded and well-managed competitors focused solely on the restaurant business, said George Farra, co-founder and principal of locally based Woodley Farra Manion Portfolio Management.

“He’s kind of running the risk of letting the burger business wither from a lack of capital—taking his eye off the ball to pursue an insurance company,” Farra said. “I don’t see him wanting to be in the restaurant business; he just needed a publicly traded stock to gain access to the capital markets.”

Biglari, who rarely speaks to the media and doesn’t hold conference calls with Wall Street analysts, did not return a phone message from IBJ. But he discussed the strategy in his annual letter to shareholders.

“Steak n Shake has been resuscitated and now enjoys prodigious cash flows,” he wrote in the letter, which also announced a 1-for-20 reverse stock split that sent the chain’s shares above $330 on Dec. 30.

Biglari, a 32-year-old hedge fund manager who took over as CEO in August 2008, went on to say the chain’s next move is to redeploy the cash to the “greenest, most fruitful pastures”—relying on Biglari’s investing instincts, unaided by an investment committee or investment bankers.

“In sum, opportunity will shape our company,” he wrote.

Cash cow

Biglari essentially is milking Steak n Shake for its cash, said Juelene Beck, a former top executive at Burger King and Dunkin Donuts who now runs a restaurant consulting operation out of Coral Gables, Fla.

She’s seen the move before. When she worked as a vice president of brand strategy at Burger King, the chain cut its capital expenditures to almost zero during lean years.

During the current recession, most restaurant chains have made similar moves. Nashville, Tenn.-based O’Charley’s Inc., which operates about 360 restaurants, trimmed its 2009 spending to roughly $18 million, from $48 million in 2008. The total works out to about 2 percent of the chain’s total revenue. McDonald’s Corp. plans to spend about 1 percent of its revenue, or about $2.4 billion, on capital expenditures in 2010.

Steak n Shake’s investment in 2009 was less than 1 percent of its revenue. The company owns 421 restaurants and has another 73 franchise locations.

Cutting back can work for a few years, but there are long-term risks, Beck said. Just remaining a player in the hyper-competitive chain restaurant business requires investment. And if, like Steak n Shake, you’re looking to expand via franchising, you have to prove to potential franchisees you plan to invest in the brand.

“Any franchisee that does an evaluation of this chain would see [Biglari] is buying up other brands and other kinds of businesses,” Beck said. “The question is, do I want to buy into a chain that’s going to be milked instead of one that’s going to be invested in?”

Burger battle

Steak n Shake has a long history—a strong asset—but it also faces a wave of new competitors.

Lorton, Va.-based Five Guys Burgers and Fries is expanding in many of Steak n Shake’s markets, including Indianapolis. And Denver-based Smash Burger—which bills itself as “every city’s favorite burger place”—has launched an aggressive coast-to-coast expansion, including two locations in Dayton, Ohio.

Meanwhile, more fast-food-oriented chains like McDonald’s and Burger King have upgraded burger options to more directly compete with the likes of Steak n Shake.

“It’s become a very hot segment,” Huse said. “It’s a hands-on, day-to-day business you really have to run and not let slip. If [Biglari] has the right leadership in place, I suppose it’s OK to run off and pursue other things.”

The company so far under Biglari has made encouraging progress, including snapping a 14-quarter streak of declining same-store sales with two positive quarters.

Steak n Shake reported a 10-percent jump in same-store sales for the fiscal fourth quarter, buoyed by aggressive discounting like the 4 Meals Under $4 promotion and easy comparisons to previous quarters.

But analyst Michael W. Gallo of Albany, N.Y.-based CL King & Associates sees the company’s shares as fully valued.

“The company has done a good job of stabilizing the Steak n Shake brand over the last year given the difficult environment, something we continue to think is more than reflected in the valuation,” he wrote in a December report.•



  • the downfall of steak n shake
    I was a loyal, dedicated employee of Steak n Shake for 8 years. I started out as a server when I was 16 and moved up to be the GM of a restaurant. What I can say about the leadership of this company now which will ultimately cause the downfall of the company is that they have forgotten WHO works in the restaurants and making sure they have the correct and best support systems in place. Steak n Shake is posting record same store sales growth but continues to cut labor, underpay management and cut much needed heath care options for its employees. I have seen first hand employees that have worked for the company for years that have left because they no longer had access to medical care. One thing that Steak n Shake needs to remember is that while the ones on top are sitting on millions, the ones at the bottom are getting hit with all the cut backs. I hope that one day the company will remember the people who are making the money!!
    Sardar is no idiot.

    1 million
    2 million
    3 million
  • Jeff
    You might be underestimating the risks you faced under the previous management. Without the leaseback, cap ex shrinkage, and menu reorientation, SNS would have been at the mercy of its lenders and may not have survived last year.

    Whatever you think of the holding company model going forward, your money was certainly not safer in the hands of the previous management team.
  • Really?
    If marketing has been increased, I haven't noticed it in the Indianapolis market. I sold my shares in SNS when Biglari's intentions became clear, and I'm glad my money is safer.
  • spending on marketing
    the article fails to mention that marketing has been increased...minor detail but don't let that get in the way of a slanted article.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

    2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

    3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

    4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

    5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?