Your Shopping Cart

Your cart is currently empty.

Promotion Code If you have a promotion code, please enter it here.
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. what going broke for the entertainment of a few gomers means

  2. Why do you say Alabama doesn't have to be licensed!! I beg you pardon!!! I cannot work in a professional salon without a license. Of course there is always somewhere that doesn't require it. But as soon as State Board walks in the door you could be closed down or possibly fired!!

  3. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  4. Shouldn't this be a museum

  5. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

ADVERTISEMENT