IBJOpinion

MARCUS: The economic exorcism was successful

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Morton Marcus

 The damage done by the recession is still with us, even if the recession itself has ended. There will still be layoffs even as other workers are called back. More foreclosures will be reported because of troubles in the past two years. But sufficient evidence is available to suggest that the demon recession has left the nation’s economic body.

The bailout of large financial institutions and the massive stimulus programs were part of the exorcism ritual. It was an ugly process. Although many disapproved philosophically with the methods used, most of us accepted those potions as necessary to rescue the besieged economy.

Now, as recovery begins, we can examine the weakened body and see where the wounds were most severe. As noted in an earlier column, personal income losses were partially offset by increases in unemployment compensation. That’s how the system is supposed to work. Unemployment insurance is called an automatic stabilizer because it helps people who lose their jobs maintain a lower level of consumption without Congress’ having to debate whether such aid should be given.

Nationally, unemployment compensation between the first quarter of 2008 and the second quarter of 2009 rose $97 billion, which equaled 30 percent of the loss in wages and salaries suffered by workers. (That 30 percent held true in Indiana as well.) Thus, unless they increased their debt, workers had to cut spending and the effects of the recession spread throughout the economy.

In Indiana alone, wages and salaries fell $8.7 billion. Those who worked for themselves earned $1.7 billion less in the second quarter of this year than they did in the first quarter of last year. As they earned less, employees and the self-employed contributed $515 million less to government insurance programs (Social Security and Medicare). On top of that, employers contributed $872 million less to public and private pension and health insurance plans.

In all, earnings by workers and the self-employed in Indiana businesses fell $12.3 billion. These losses were offset slightly by a $1 billion increase in earnings by federal, state and local government workers. The increases were disproportionately higher in federal service than in the state and local sector. This may have occurred either because there were greater increases in the number of federal workers or they enjoyed higher compensation growth than state and local workers.

In the manufacturing sector, workers’ earnings fell 12 percent nationally, but dropped 18 percent in Indiana. The decline of $6.5 billion in manufacturing was 58 percent of the total loss in Hoosier earnings. It is likely this heavy blow from the manufacturing sector contributed to the state’s having a greater rate of decline in transportation and warehousing than did the nation (10.5 percent vs. 8.4 percent).

With the real estate and financial sectors at the heart of this recession nationally, it was not surprising Indiana saw lesser rates of decline in those areas. Earnings in the financial sector declined 13.7 percent nationally, but only 10 percent in Indiana. Likewise, in real estate, U.S. earnings fell 10.5 percent compared with 8.3 percent in Indiana.

This deconstruction of the economic damage caused by the recession confirms what we already knew: Manufacturing is our 800-pound gorilla. Some will argue that this fact should encourage us to diversify away from manufacturing. Get some new exhibits in our economic zoo. But what should we seek? More gambling? For Indiana, that is an endangered species, threatened by the desires of Ohio, Kentucky and Illinois to share in the dollars now enjoyed by our casinos.

The best policy is one already being pursued by state and local economic developers everywhere. Manufacturing is the key to the future as the world becomes increasingly capital-intensive, as we all have more gadgets and rely more on medical products. Man cannot live by litigation alone.•

__________

Marcus taught economics for more than 30 years at Indiana University and is the former director of IU’s Business Research Center. His column appears weekly. He can be reached at mmarcus@ibj.com.


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............

ADVERTISEMENT