Store clerks would no longer be required to check the identification of those who appear older than 40 when buying alcohol under a revision to state law endorsed Wednesday by an Indiana House committee.
The bill would change a much-ridiculed law that took effect last summer requiring everyone — regardless of age — to be carded for carryout alcohol.
The House public policy committee voted 12-0 to advance the bill to the full House for consideration after amending what had originally been a bill to completely repeal the law.
Bill sponsor Rep. Greg Steuerwald, R-Danville, said it was a "commonsense" revision. Under the new version, clerks could face a misdemeanor charge if they don't check the IDs of anyone who "reasonably appears to be less than 40 years of age."
Rep. Scott Pelath, D-Michigan City, said legislators made a mistake with the ID law, which has faced complaints about people in their 70s and 80s being carded in liquor stores.
"We need to admit it frankly and undo it," he said.
Liquor store representatives have supported the stricter ID law, saying it wasn't that inconvenient and that it had led to a drastic drop in attempts by minors to buy alcohol because they know they'll be carded.
John Livengood, president of the Indiana Association of Beverage Retailers, said the 40-year limit was a decent compromise but that there was some support for raising that to 50.
"The important thing for us as retailers is to make sure that our clerks do ask for the ID," Livengood said. "If you give them the ability to make a discretionary call, then unfortunately they stop carding when they should."
on Facebook & Twitter
Back to Top
IBJ Conversations
10 Comments
Add Comment
http://Writing.Com/authors/epistemology
Filed 01-04-2011, a $33 million Dollar Tort Claim to Suit City of Bloomington Monroe County Indiana Elected & Appointed for Direct Constitutional Contempt. For Restraint of 1st Amendment Freedom of Speech & Redress of Grievance. No taxation without representation is tyranny! So Out lined in the rules of Public Comment So passed & unconstitutionally upheld. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_taxation_without_representation
Other matters of over bearing Kings Rule to be conserning our selves with Government Appointed and Elected person Like the City of Bloomington that openly say the Constitution does not give the public the right to debate or uphold the rights of the Public have time to speak at town Hall meetings is a bigger problem.
Every time we cede power to the state, we re-norm what people expect the state to be able to do and not do. Several of the comments on here are proof of that. It used to be a common notion in America that an American didn't need to prove his/her identity unless it was necessary. Land of the free...