IBJNews

UPDATE: Walgreens goes 0-for-4 in pursuit of liquor permits

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

None of the four Indianapolis stores in which Walgreen Co. wanted to sell alcohol received approval to do so on Monday.

Marion County's Alcoholic Beverage Board unanimously denied Walgreen Co.’s request for a permit to sell alcohol at its store on East Washington Street in Irvington, citing neighborhood opposition.

The board later deadlocked, 2-2, on whether to grant the Illinois-based drugstore chain’s request to sell alcohol at its store at 1505 E. 86th St. near North Central High School. The Indiana Alcohol & Tobacco Commission could make a decision on the applications at its Aug. 17 meeting, or remand the request back to the board.

Earlier, the drugstore chain withdrew its applications to sell alcohol at two other Indianapolis stores.

It dropped plans to sell booze at its 3003 Kessler Blvd. North Drive location, given its proximity to Cardinal Ritter High School and other educational institutions. It also gave up on alcohol sales at the 9050 E. 38th St. store because of community opposition.

The local Alcoholic Beverage Board makes recommendations on permit applications to the state Alcohol & Tobacco Commission, which has the final say on such matters. The state agency has voted to allow Walgreens to sell alcohol at 18 of the Marion County stores the local board approved.

A lack of resistance present at Monday’s meeting regarding the East 86th Street store prompted board member Arthur Borel to vote in favor. But fellow member Jennifer Ping cited her appointment by the City-County Council for her “no” vote.

A letter she received from Council President Ryan Vaughn, who mentioned the store’s close proximity to North Central High School, made the difference.

“That’s why he asked us to vote against this,” Ping said, “so I’m going to respect and honor his request.”

Opposition to the Irvington store at 5460 E. Washington St., however, was much more evident.

City-County Councilor Benjamin Hunter, along with Irvington resident Brian Mack, a former president of the Irvington Community Council, presented arguments to oppose the request.

Responding to a Walgreens petition that indicated support for alcohol sales, Mack responded, “If I was a business owner and I wanted to sell guns or lap dances, I could find enough people to support it,” he said. “But that doesn’t mean it’s an asset to the neighborhood.”

Concerns over alcohol sales contributing to more crime in the Irvington neighborhood, as well as an already-ample supply of liquor locations, led board members to deny the request.

That the Walgreens store on East Washington Street locks up basic items such as deodorant and shampoo because of the frequency in which they are stolen swayed board member Claudia Cummings to deny the request.

“If you have to lock up those items,” she said, “that indicates you’ve got a problem there with shoplifting.”
 
Still, attorney Lisa McKinney Goldner, a lawyer at Indianapolis-based Bose McKinney & Evans LLP who represents Walgreens, remained hopeful that the state Alcohol & Tobacco Commission will approve the request for the East 86th Street store.

“We’re trying to answer a need and desire,” she said. “I think there’s a lot of misunderstanding. We believe we’re different.”

While presenting Walgreens' case, Goldner listed several additional security measures the stores would take to combat shoplifting and selling to minors.

Neighborhood groups have been up in arms about Walgreens’ plans for months, saying additional alcohol sales could lead to more crime.

Representatives from Drug Free Marion County and the Marion County Alliance of Neighborhood Associations have expressed opposition to the new alcoholic beverage permits.

Walgreens stopped selling alcohol more than a decade ago. But competition, mainly from rival Rhode Island-based CVS Caremark Corp., is prompting the change in policy.

Altogether, Walgreens wants to sell alcohol in 183 stores throughout the state. Besides the stores in Marion County, all have received approval, except for a handful in Lake County.
 
The Marion County Alcoholic Beverage Board is set to vote on six more Walgreens locations at its Oct. 4 meeting. Those have been delayed due to zoning issues.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

  2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

  3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

  4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

  5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.

ADVERTISEMENT