White blames Brizzi for his voter fraud conviction

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Former Indiana Secretary of State Charlie White said in court documents Thursday that his attorney didn't mount any defense to protect him from the conviction that forced him from office.

The assertion is among several in a petition filed in Hamilton County asking a judge to toss out White's convictions on voter fraud and other counts.

White said the defense strategy used by his attorney — former Marion County Prosecutor Carl Brizzi — was "deficient and unreasonable." Brizzi did not call any witnesses at White's February 2012 trial and immediately rested the defense after the prosecution wrapped up its case. White was sentenced last year to one year of home detention and remains free on bail.

The document says Brizzi's defense was riddled with errors and that the former prosecutor was "ignorant of the law."

"Brizzi's performance fell below any standard of reasonableness and but for that performance, the result of the proceeding would have been different," it says.

In an email to The Associated Press, Brizzi said he was traveling out of state on business and had not seen White's petition.

"Without reading this, the only comment would be that his view is apparently different from mine, but in the end the only opinion that matters is the judge's," he said.

White also said he was unfairly prosecuted for voting outside the district where he lived even though numerous other elected officials, including two senators and two former governors, have done the same thing without being charged.

The document also says jurors were under duress when they arrived at their verdict because they were forced to deliberate for more than 12 hours. The jury began deliberations about 2 p.m. and announced a verdict shortly after 2:30 a.m. the following day. Both sides asked for the jury to be sequestered overnight, but there were no hotel rooms available because the Super Bowl was being played in nearby Indianapolis.

Special prosecutor Dan Sigler said Thursday that he had reviewed White's petition and didn't think it had any merit. Such petitions are routine, he said.

"For us in the prosecution, it's just another step in the process, and we'll see what happens," Sigler said during a phone interview from his office in Fort Wayne.


  • re
    I know Charlie White personally--do you? Name one guy over the age of 18 who is not having sex with and spending the night at his fiances house unless he's either frigid or a eunich. Charlie White did commit a crime--his crime is one of trust and believing 1) Mitch was not going to throw him under the bus and 2) Brizzi had no other agenda when both Charlie and his father were screaming at Carl to put Charlie on the stand and Carl went back into court and did nothing of the sort. YOU do NOT have the facts. The fact that Carl Brizzi has a law license, in my opinion, is the real crime you should be concerned with.
  • Infatuation
    @MitchItch I do not know Mr. White, and it believe I am better for it. You talk about his family who loves and adores him, but yet you say nothing of the jury that convicted him. And while you go one to rant about Mitch, you forget that Mr. White has defrauded the citizens of the State of Indiana. Maybe they deserve the kick in the bum. After all they voted this "crook" into an office in the State and he has shown his true "Hoosier values". Who cares about other ignorant people like Carl and Tim. No, at the end of the day, Mr. White does not "deserves to have this ridiculousness setaside...". Mr. White deserves to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. He deserves to be noted in the annals of history regarding his behavior and crimes and remembered as someone not to emulate. Go and be a friend to Mr. White, but when you defend his criminal activities, you lessen your own credibility. Don't pass along Mr. White as someone for your children to emulate.
    • HA!
      Sounds like somebody forgot The Gentleman's Rule.
    • Snakes
      Snakes attract snakes...and eat each other too.
    • Please go away
      this guy is a mess - please go away Charlie - u r an embarrassment
    • Libel
      Seems to me you are opening yourself up to libel. You make several assertions slandering the names of others with no evidence. You do know that IBJ can be made to reveal your true identity...right?
    • Hmm...
      I know Charlie White and I believe he was screaming at Carl to put him on the stand as was Charlie's Dad. I believe Carl simply ignored them. And, that begs the obvious question, "why." It's easy to second guess that Charlie should have screamed out in the court room, "put me on the stand," but in situations like this you are in such shock over the surrealness that you cannot even process what just happened. Carl Brizzi appears to believe he has complete impunity, as evidenced by the behavior all of us have seen--partying with Tim Durham, getting involved with hurting the parties trying to get Durham prosecuted, bizarre financial gains such as Elkhart that have no reasonable basis to believe they are gifts, but nothing happens to Carl because of a very good reason and we all know what is is, don't we? As for Charlie White, at the end of the day he has a family who loves him, a son who adores him and a pretty super wife who has stood by him during this complete and total travesty of justice. He deserves to have this ridiculousness setaside and the real criminals in Indiana should be what prosecutors should be spending their time on. As for Mitch what a superb start over at Purdue. Let's make sure the professors there don't get any incentive pay while as a public servant Mitch accumulated a massive fortune, not to mention those nice dollars from his convicted felon buddy Tim that he allegedly had some very interesting behind closed doors meetings with. All of this makes you sick. Glad Greg and Cory can at least keep these creeps looking over their shoulders.

      Post a comment to this story

      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

      2. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

      3. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

      4. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.

      5. I live downtown Indy and had to be in downtown Chicago for a meeting. In other words, I am the target demographic for this train. It leaves at 6:00-- early but doable. Then I saw it takes 5+ hours. No way. I drove. I'm sure I paid 3 to 5 times as much once you factor in gas, parking, and tolls, but it was reimbursed so not a factor for me. Any business traveler is going to take the option that gets there quickly and reliably... and leisure travelers are going to take the option that has a good schedule and promotional prices (i.e., Megabus). Indy to Chicago is the right distance (too short to fly but takes several hours to drive) that this train could be extremely successful even without subsidies, if they could figure out how to have several frequencies (at least 3x/day) and make the trip in a reasonable amount of time. For those who have never lived on the east coast-- Amtrak is the #1 choice for NY-DC and NY-Boston. They have the Acela service, it runs almost every hour, and it takes you from downtown to downtown. It beats driving and flying hands down. It is too bad that we cannot build something like this in the midwest, at least to connect the bigger cities.