IBJNews

Zionsville real estate schemer sentenced to 30 months

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A Zionsville man who pushed real-estate investing schemes has been sentenced to 30 months in prison, U.S. Attorney Joseph Hogsett said Wednesday morning.

Brian Eads, the 48-year-old owner of First Investment Group, pleaded guilty to wire fraud and money laundering after being charged last August. He faced a maximum of 30 years in prison and a $250,000 fine on each of two counts.

“Results such as this are critical if we are to restore Hoosier faith in our financial industry,” Hogsett said of the sentence handed down by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. “That is why the U.S. Attorney’s Office has made it a priority to work closely with our law enforcement partners in investigating and prosecuting anyone found to be spreading a culture of corruption in this state.”

Magnus-Stinson also imposed three years of supervised release, drug treatment and restitution of $863,096 to Wells Fargo and two investors whom Eads recruited.

Eads would buy properties at sheriff’s sales in Indianapolis and then recruit buyers. He worked with a loan originator to obtain financing and promoted a no-risk investment program, in which the buyers did not have to make a down payment and would receive thousands of dollars after the purchase.

Eads asked investors to falsify invoices for work that was never done, and Wells Fargo loaned money on 26 properties, losing $380,104, Hogsett said.

In a separate scheme in 2009, Eads recruited a longtime acquaintance to buy investment properties with him. Eads provided titles to properties he didn’t actually own, and the acquaintance lost $295,791, Hogsett said.

Eads repeated the scheme in 2010 with an investor from Utah. The investor wired money to Eads for properties in Indianapolis, Muncie and Anderson but never received deeds and lost $187,200.

The case was the result of a six-year investigation by the Internal Revenue Service and Federal Bureau of Investigation.

“Mortgage fraud, like all financial crimes, adds to the underground economy, erodes the integrity of our tax system and threatens the financial health of our communities,” IRS Special Agent Al Patton said.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Tip of the Iceberg
    When Realtors, Appraisers, and Banks created the Housing Bubble between 2004-08, where was the Justice Department. The pumping of property values in California, Arizona, Nevada, Texas, Florida, New York and a few smaller markets, created a mess that is still not resolved. Home buyers were coached to file false earnings and credit history statements, and appraisers assisted with inflating real estate values, all aimed at getting the buyers to purchase more home than they could afford, all with the promise of the appraised value rising year-over-year. Hundreds of thousands of loans were Sub-prime, Zero-Down, and often 100% or higher. Why would banks loan 125% on homes in any market? Could it be that people were coached and promised hugh returns, if they agreed to pay no-interest mortgage payments for two years, and then sell the house for a tax-free profit. Brace yourself, mortgage foreclosures are going to increase, because people are still upside-down on home loans they should never have been pushed into in the first place. As for the banks, our tax dollars are covering the banking fraud.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

  2. Yes. Blame those who were too lazy to go vote Obama out and those who voted him in again. That's my take on it. I know folks won't get it on the left. OK. Start berating me now!

  3. Serioulsy, people are AGINST this project? Most communities would be salivating over a project like this. You'd rather have an empty eye-sore gas station and shacks posing as apartments? This project is exactly what BR needs. BUILD IT MR MAYOR. And yes, I am a BR resident, and have been for 20 years.

  4. As a St. Vincent employee of over 20 years, I am saddened and disheartened by this announcement. Unfortunately, as the healthcare "industry" continues on this political and corporate path, all that St. Vincent Hospital has stood for spiritually for its employees and this community is being sucked dry. I know it truly has no choice. It is not just Obamacare or just competition or just any single thing. This trend started long before I was even born when the government became involved in healthcare and it became an "industry." I grieve for those who will lose their jobs, one of whom may be me, but I also grieve for this hospital which I have served for over 20 years. May God give us and it the grace to withstand the future of healthcare.

  5. Why do people constantly harp on this issue and act ignorant about what a city population measures? A city's population is the city's population. There is no argument or debate about it. If you want to measure the density of a city--measure it. If you want to measure the size of a metropolitan area, then measure the metropolitan population. City boundaries cover different sized areas--and they always have (though the disparity has probably increased since about 1900 or so when more cities began annexing their surrounding communities). For example, San Francisco only covers 49 square miles while Houston cover nearly 600 square miles. No one argues about the population rankings of either city even though they clearly cover extremely different sized areas. Indianapolis is the 13 largest city by population in the U.S. That is a fact. While the population of a metropolitan area may give you a better sense of how large a community is, as noted, even metro areas can vary widely in the size of geographic area they cover--so that is not a perfect comparison either.

ADVERTISEMENT