IBJNews

BrightPoint reaches settlement in shareholder suits

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Lawsuits filed by BrightPoint Inc. shareholders who are challenging the company's proposed sale to a California firm are set to be dismissed after the sides reached a settlement.

Indianapolis-based Brightpoint announced in early July that it had agreed to be acquired by Ingram Micro Inc. for about $840 million.

Terms of the deal call for Ingram Micro to acquire all outstanding shares of BrightPoint’s common stock for $9 per share in cash. But the shareholders argued in two complaints that the purchase price is too low because it uses a depressed stock price rather than its 52-week high of more than $12 per share.

BrightPoint shares traded at $8.96 Friday morning, down 1 cent. The price has barely fluctuated since the acquisition was announced.

Under the settlement, reached Tuesday, BrightPoint will pay no damages, but has agreed to provide more financial information to shareholders before they vote on the proposed sale. A vote is set for Sept. 19.

The lawsuits alleged that the company’s proxy statement outlining details of the transaction contained “materially false and misleading information.”

Indianapolis attorney Henry Price, who represents some of the shareholders, said he hasn’t seen the settlement but is pleased with the agreement.

“I know that they’ll get more disclosures so they can make an informed decision [on the sale],” he said. “That was the thrust of the lawsuit.”

Shareholders filed the first lawsuit in late July and the other in early August in U.S. District Court in Indianapolis, seeking class-action status.

The sale is expected to close by the end of the year, the companies said in July.

BrightPoint, founded in Plainfield in 1989, provides logistics to sellers of wireless devices. It has more than 1,300 employees in the Indianapolis area and 4,000 worldwide.

BrightPoint was named one of the country’s 500 largest companies in 2011, ranking 463rd with $5.2 billion in revenue. Ingram was ranked 81st, with $36.3 billion in revenue.

Six top BrightPoint executives are expected to share a $30.7 million payout as part of the planned sale, with CEO Robert Laikin in line to receive $14.1 million.
   
 
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT