IBJNews

BrightPoint reaches settlement in shareholder suits

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Lawsuits filed by BrightPoint Inc. shareholders who are challenging the company's proposed sale to a California firm are set to be dismissed after the sides reached a settlement.

Indianapolis-based Brightpoint announced in early July that it had agreed to be acquired by Ingram Micro Inc. for about $840 million.

Terms of the deal call for Ingram Micro to acquire all outstanding shares of BrightPoint’s common stock for $9 per share in cash. But the shareholders argued in two complaints that the purchase price is too low because it uses a depressed stock price rather than its 52-week high of more than $12 per share.

BrightPoint shares traded at $8.96 Friday morning, down 1 cent. The price has barely fluctuated since the acquisition was announced.

Under the settlement, reached Tuesday, BrightPoint will pay no damages, but has agreed to provide more financial information to shareholders before they vote on the proposed sale. A vote is set for Sept. 19.

The lawsuits alleged that the company’s proxy statement outlining details of the transaction contained “materially false and misleading information.”

Indianapolis attorney Henry Price, who represents some of the shareholders, said he hasn’t seen the settlement but is pleased with the agreement.

“I know that they’ll get more disclosures so they can make an informed decision [on the sale],” he said. “That was the thrust of the lawsuit.”

Shareholders filed the first lawsuit in late July and the other in early August in U.S. District Court in Indianapolis, seeking class-action status.

The sale is expected to close by the end of the year, the companies said in July.

BrightPoint, founded in Plainfield in 1989, provides logistics to sellers of wireless devices. It has more than 1,300 employees in the Indianapolis area and 4,000 worldwide.

BrightPoint was named one of the country’s 500 largest companies in 2011, ranking 463rd with $5.2 billion in revenue. Ingram was ranked 81st, with $36.3 billion in revenue.

Six top BrightPoint executives are expected to share a $30.7 million payout as part of the planned sale, with CEO Robert Laikin in line to receive $14.1 million.
   
 
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  2. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............

  3. Good try, Mr. Irwin, but I think we all know the primary motivation for pursuing legal action against the BMV is the HUGE FEES you and your firm expect to receive from the same people you claim to be helping ~ taxpayers! Almost all class action lawsuits end up with the victim receiving a pittance and the lawyers receiving a windfall.

  4. Fix the home life. We're not paying for your child to color, learn letters, numbers and possible self control. YOU raise your children...figure it out! We did. Then they'll do fine in elementary school. Weed out the idiots in public schools, send them well behaved kids (no one expects perfection) and watch what happens! Oh, and pray. A mom.

  5. To clarify, the system Cincinnati building is just a streetcar line which is the cheapest option for rail when you consider light rail (Denver, Portland, and Seattle.) The system (streetcar) that Cincy is building is for a downtown, not a city wide thing. With that said, I think the bus plan make sense and something I shouted to the rooftops about. Most cities with low density and low finances will opt for BRT as it makes more financial and logistical sense. If that route grows and finances are in place, then converting the line to a light rail system is easy as you already have the protected lanes in place. I do think however that Indy should build a streetcar system to connect different areas of downtown. This is the same thing that Tucson, Cincy, Kenosha WI, Portland, and Seattle have done. This allows for easy connections to downtown POI, and allows for more dense growth. Connecting the stadiums to the zoo, convention center, future transit center, and the mall would be one streetcar line that makes sense.

ADVERTISEMENT