Firestone renews IndyCar Series supply agreement

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A week after announcing its intention to leave the IndyCar Series after the 2011 season, Firestone has reversed course.

Nashville, Tenn.-based Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations Inc. announced Friday morning that its Firestone brand will continue to serve as the sole tire supplier to IndyCar through the 2013 race season.

Terms of the agreement weren’t announced.

Firestone has supplied tires to IndyCar since 1996. The new agreement does not include developmental series Firestone Indy Lights. Firestone will remain as title sponsor and tire supplier of Indy Lights through 2011.

Firestone and IndyCar executives said the agreement followed a week of negotiations.

Motorsports business experts estimate that Firestone pours $7 million annually into marketing the open-wheel series.

Tokyo-based Bridgestone Corp., which owns Firestone, pulled out of Formula One racing following the 2010 season.

The Firestone announcement is good news for the IndyCar Series, which is preparing to introduce a new chassis and engine package for the 2012 season. IndyCar Series CEO Randy Bernard needs Firestone’s tires to provide a stable platform for testing of the new chassis and engine, which is scheduled to start in July.

Firestone’s connection to the Indianapolis 500 began in 1911 when Ray Harroun won the very first race on Firestone tires.

The company’s current open-wheel era began in 1991 with title sponsorship of the Indy Lights series. Firestone Racing made its return to the Indianapolis 500 in 1995, and its tires were on the winning car of the first IndyCar (then Indy Racing League) sanctioned race in 1996.

Last week, Bernard said finding a new tire supplier was a “top priority,” and that talks with Goodyear, Hoosier Tire, Cooper, Avon, Continental and Pirelli had already begun.


  • The Speedway exists today
    despite the IZodcar series owners. it was the old cart teams that brought firestone back
  • Iceberg Dead Ahead!
    Congrats on the teams for steering the Speedway out of the way of a huge iceberg. The Hulman-Georges are crackerjack business folks.
  • Great nEWs!
    Looks like in addition to shouldering the costs of new chassis and engines, the LEeeGue is gonna have to help finance this too. $700,000 per season per team adds up. FAST.

    When them owners come together GOOD things happen. Congratulations IzodCar series owners! The Speedway only exists today because of you!!!

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...

  2. It's good to hear that the festival is continuing to move forward beyond some of the narrow views that seemed to characterize the festival and that I and others had to deal with during our time there.

  3. Corner Bakery announced in March that it had signed agreements to open its first restaurants in Indianapolis by the end of the year. I have not heard anything since but will do some checking.

  4. "The project still is awaiting approval of a waiver filed with the Federal Aviation Administration that would authorize the use of the land for revenue-producing and non-aeronautical purposes." I wonder if the airport will still try to keep from paying taxes on these land tracts, even though they are designated as "non aeronatical?"

  5. How is this frivolous? All they are asking for is medical screenings to test the effects of their exposure. Sounds like the most reasonable lawsuit I've read about in a while. "may not have commited it" which is probably why they're suing to find out the truth. Otherwise they could just ask Walmart, were you negligent? No? OK, thanks for being honest.