IBJNews

Hiring family, friends can be dicey for business owners

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Stacey Martino and her husband, Jim, who own Cicero Lawn & Garden in Hamilton County, hired a cousin to be a supervisor for their landscaping and irrigation business. Then the recession hit and their financial adviser strongly suggested they downsize the operation.

For Jim, it was a pragmatic business decision: The cousin, despite being a good employee, would have to go. Stacey knew that too, but for her, the choice involved some serious hand-wringing.

“Even though we knew we had to do it and we had business advisers saying ‘You’ve got to do this’—even hearing that from our accountant, who specializes in advising small businesses—it was still really hard,” Stacey said. “The debate went on for me long after he said, ‘You’ve got to make some changes and scale back.’ It wasn’t like, ‘OK, I’ll make the change tomorrow morning.’ I really had to think about it, talk about it.”

Hiring family and friends often can turn out to be dicey, and if the Martinos’ situation is any indication, it ends up being tougher on women in business than it is on men. Central Indiana businesswomen interviewed for this story said that, more often than not, their experience has been that it’s best to keep their personal and professional lives separate.

Separate but equal

Dottie Hancock, owner of Eaton & Hancock Associates, a document-management company, started the business with a friend—and that worked out well because they each had distinct, separate duties.

“That helps,” she said. “But by the same token, there were times when it was like, ‘OK, we have a payroll to make and I’m the only one worrying about it.’”

Ultimately, they made a pact not to hire friends or relatives because they didn’t want to risk ruining any relationships. (Her friend and business partner died two years ago.)

“If there was something going wrong, if for some reason my partner and I hadn’t gotten along, it would have destroyed our friendship, I think,” said Hancock, who’s president of the Indianapolis chapter of the National Association of Women Business Owners and the former mayor of Carmel.

Deb Peters, owner of Quality Environmental Professionals, an environmental engineering consulting company, is one who opposes almost all personal relationships in the workplace. She’s had to implement policies against employee dating—“It doesn’t end nicely”—and she’s lost some friends who worked for her after finding it difficult to be friend and boss simultaneously.

When it comes to hiring friends, her advice is: Buyer beware. She supports the idea only if the friend is an equal partner with a clearly defined role.

“Nine out of 10 times, I don’t think it works,” she said. “It’s hard to be their boss and their friend. It’s hard to keep that separate. That’s just me; there are other people who swear by it. But over the last 20 years, I’ve seen that it just doesn’t work.”

Hiring relatives, on the other hand, has worked in her favor. Both of her adult daughters have worked for the company, and their contributions have been valuable.

Getting personal

Peters agreed that, in general, women have a tougher time separating business and personal relationships. Women feel it’s their duty to make everybody happy and make sure everybody’s comfortable, she said.

“I don’t think men have as much emotional baggage,” she said. “I’m not saying all women have emotional baggage. I’ve always had an emotional investment. I always felt responsible for people. If I had to fire someone, I felt I had a lot of failure if they failed, that it was a poor reflection on me. It’s taken me many years to realize I’ve given people a fair opportunity and the performance is all in their court, not mine.”

Andrew Keyt, executive director of the Loyola University Chicago Family Business Center, said there’s no research to prove women have a harder time than men when they enter into business relationships with friends and family.

“But you can make an argument that women have a more [amicable] style, women want more peace and harmony,” he said. “It’s a greater concern to them, so that might influence their decision.”

Keyt said hiring relatives or friends generally works best when the new hire has:

• a real interest in being part of the company as part of his or her career,

• qualifications that can be useful in moving the business forward,

• enough maturity to have a strong sense of who he or she is in the world, and the choice to come into the business as the right thing for him or her.

Gail Zabel, a partner in the local consulting firm 2 Women Entrepreneurs, said a problem with hiring friends and relatives is that they tend to expect special treatment.

“And women, being nurturing and not wanting to screw up relationships, don’t want to destroy them,” she said. “So they get guilt on two sides: ‘Gee, you’re starting a business and I could sure use a part-time job,’ or ‘Gee, you won’t have time to spend with the kids and how’s your husband going to do?’ You end up with a lot more pressure than you really need, an extra stress level that men don’t normally face.”

That said, Zabel thinks there are “incredible opportunities” within your own family. As a kid, she started working for her father, a commercial artist in Denver, and it taught her a work ethic and integrity, how to work under a boss, and how to do work and do it right—all while earning her own money.

But, said her business partner, Willow Townsend, those who do hire friends or relatives need to put them through the same evaluation they’d use before hiring anyone else. She recommended asking: Can this person do the job? Are they suited for the job? Can I work with them?

If you start out thinking you can, then find out you can’t, Zabel said the easiest way out is to “make the work disappear.” But in cases of full-time hires, she advises relying on strict human-resources rules.

“You go through all the steps to terminate them just as you would with any employee,” she said. “In many respects, it’s more difficult on an emotional level. But in some ways it’s easier on an employer level, because either they’re not competent at what you asked them to do or they expect the special privileges. Go through the steps of counseling with them and see whether they’ll straighten up or maybe come to a meeting of the minds that this isn’t working. Maybe you’ll save that relationship, maybe you won’t.”

Second time’s the charm?

The thing to remember is, even if it doesn’t work out right the first time, it might the next. When the Martinos, of Cicero Lawn and Garden, needed to hire someone to help in their newly streamlined operation, they went back to the family and hired another cousin.

Stacey Martino was hesitant; Jim thought everything would be fine. And it has worked out well, Stacey said, because this cousin has the do-it-all skills they needed.

When it comes to hiring relatives or friends, she said, there are positives and negatives.

“The good is, you’re familiar with them. The bad part is, if you have to part ways, whether it’s their decision or yours, it’s family. So you’re concerned about everyone involved. It’s hard to not be concerned.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT