IBJNews

Indiana fair lawsuits won't go to trial until 2014

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A group of lawsuits related to last summer's deadly Indiana State Fair stage collapse likely won't go to trial for nearly two years, according to a judge's ruling that also warned attorneys not to release any evidence in the high-profile case.

Marion Superior Court Judge Theodore Sosin released an order acknowledging that most attorneys in the case want a trial no earlier than April 1, 2014. The judge didn't set a trial date but ordered both sides into mediation to try to work out a settlement.

The order also warns lawyers that they could face sanctions if they say anything or disclose evidence that might prejudice court proceedings, noting such a move would violate a protective order and legal codes of conduct.

"The court acknowledges that this case has and will continue to generate significant pretrial publicity," Sosin wrote.

The judge didn't rule out sanctions for past transgressions.

At a May 9 hearing, Sosin criticized attorney Kenneth J. Allen, who is representing several victims and their families, for releasing portions of a videotaped deposition by Sugarland lead singer Jennifer Nettles. Stage rigging fell onto a crowd of people waiting for the country music duo to take the stage as stormy weather moved in on Aug. 13. Seven people were killed and dozens were injured.

Allen said Wednesday that he released the Nettles video April 16 in response to misleading statements by Sugarland's publicists.

"All we've tried to do is to ... control what we believe to be the false assertions made by the other side. And I think that's what the rule contemplates," Allen said. "We have the right and duty to rebut it and that's what we've done."

Sugarland's spokesman declined comment Wednesday.

Allen also said he wasn't the first to release depositions taken from witnesses in the case. Mid-America Sound Corp., which built the roof and rigging used to hold the lights and sound equipment at the concert, released portions of a deposition in January by Indiana State Fair Commission executive director Cindy Hoye.

A spokeswoman for Mid-America also declined comment, citing the judge's order.

Victims and survivors' families who are seeking millions of dollars in damages have filed lawsuits against various entities involved in the show.

The judge's order, dated May 24, outlines a plan to consolidate pretrial preparation for the lawsuits. It also requires attorneys for both sides to take part in mediation toward possible settlements before Dec. 31, 2013.

The state government's liability is limited to $5 million by state law, but state lawmakers voted in March to give an additional $6 million to the stage collapse victims.

Allen said he was disappointed with the suggested trial timing but pleased with the overall ruling.

"We believe that the case could be tried easily within a year," said Allen, whose clients were the only ones requesting an earlier trial date.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Now if he'd just stay there...

  2. Daniel - what about the many US citizens who do NOT follow what the Bible teaches? The Hindus, Jews, Muslims and others who are all American citizens entitled to all rights as Americans?? This issue has NOTHING to do with "What the Bible says..." Keep all Churches separate from State! Pence's ongoing idiocy continues to make Indiana look like a backwards, homophobic state in the eyes of our nation. Can't we move on to bigger issues - like educating our kids?

  3. 1. IBJ should link to the referenced report. We are in the age of electronic media...not sharing information is lazy. Here is a link http://www.in.gov/gov/files/Blue_Ribbon_Panel_Report_July_9_2014.pdf 2. The article should provide more clarity about the make-up of this panel. The commenters are making this item out to be partisan, it does not appear the panel is partisan. Here is a list of the panel which appears to be balanced with different SME to add different perspectives http://www.in.gov/activecalendar/EventList.aspx?view=EventDetails&eventidn=138116?formation_id=189603 3. It suggests a by-pass, I do not see where this report suggests another "loop". 4. Henry, based on your kneejerk reaction, we would be better off if you moved to another state unless your post was meant as sarcasm in which case I say Well Done. 5. The article and report actually indicates need to improve rail and port infrastructure in direct contradiction to Shayla commentary. Specifically, recommendation is to consider passenger rail projects... 6. People have a voice with their elected officials. These are suggestions and do not represent "crony capitalism", etc. The report needs to be analyzed and the legislature can decide on priorities and spending. Don't like it, then vote in a new legislature but quit artificially creating issues where there are none! People need to sift through the politics and provide constructive criticism to the process rather than making uninformed comments in a public forum based on misinformation. IBJ should work harder to correct the record in these forums when blatant errors or misrepresentations are made.

  4. Joe ... Marriage is defined in the Bible ... it is mentioned in the Bible often. Marriage is not mentioned once in the US or Indiana Constitution ...

  5. Daniel - Educate me please: what does the Bible have to do with laws? If the government wasn't in the business of marriage to begin with, then it wouldn't have to "define" marriage at all. Marriage could be left as a personal, religious, or otherwise unregulated action, with no ties to taxes, legal status, etc. Then people could marry whomever they want, and all this silliness would go away. Remember to vote Libertarian in November.

ADVERTISEMENT