IBJNews

IndyCar may return open-wheel racing to Pocono

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Despite the IndyCar Series' decision not to return to Edmonton in 2013, circuit CEO Randy Bernard is still promising a minimum 19-race schedule.

That would mark a significant increase from this season’s 15-race slate, and it could mean a race at Pocono Raceway in Long Pond, Pa., a traditional NASCAR stronghold that hasn’t hosted an open-wheel race in 23 years.

“An expanded schedule is essential to build more exposure for our drivers,” Bernard said.

Bernard is set to announce the 2013 IndyCar Series schedule live on cable TV network Speed's "WindTunnel," a program that airs at 9 p.m. Sundays.

In addition to Pocono, he has indicated the series will return to an oval race in Milwaukee and a street race in Baltimore. It also will add a road race in Houston outside Reliant Stadium.

The series this year has again struggled with television ratings and attendance at several of its events. Outside of the Indianapolis 500, IndyCar Series races rarely achieved its goal of a 1.0 TV rating, which according to New York-based Nielsen Media Research, would mean 1.1 million TV households watching.

Many open-wheel fans and sponsors in recent years have been calling for a return to Pocono, which hosted IndyCar-style racing during the circuit's heyday from 1971 to 1989.

The combination of improvements recently made at the 2.5-mile track and IndyCar’s desire to expand its schedule and add more oval tracks have sparked great interest in the series returning to Long Pond.

During the summer, Pocono sent out a survey to its ticket holders in an attempt to gauge the interest in a possible IndyCar return. Pocono officials said the response to that survey was positive.

Pocono again will host two NASCAR Sprint Cup Series race weekends in 2013. The Pocono 400 is set for June 7-9 and the Pennsylvania 400 is scheduled for Aug. 2-4.

The new open-wheel race in Houston likely will run the first weekend in October and serve as the season finale next season, IndyCar officials said, adding that sponsorship deals with Shell and Pennzoil already have been secured for that event.

IndyCar officials have black flagged several discussed Midwest events in 2013, including races at Road America in Wisconsin, Michigan International Speedway and a street circuit race in Chicago.

In the wake of this year’s late cancellation by promoters of a race in Qingdao, China, Bernard said IndyCar will have a “deposit as well as a signed contract” before putting a race on the schedule.

The 19 races in 2013 could come from 17 race weekends and include two same-day doubleheaders, Bernard said. Series officials have indicated one of those double-headers will be at Texas Motor Speedway.

“I’m a huge supporter of doubleheaders,” Bernard said. “It increases your viewership and possibly doubles it. It can give more face time to our drivers who desperately need it.”

Earlier this month, Bernard said he was in discussions with 22 venues for the likely 17 spots on IndyCar’s 2013 calendar. The IndyCar Series’ board of directors met Sept. 20 and gave final approval to the 2013 schedule, sources in the series said.

Outside of select events in South America and Canada, Bernard indicated the series would remain primarily focused on holding races in the United States.

While Bernard is optimistic about the series’ growth in 2013, recent developments in Edmonton, which has hosted an open-wheel race the past eight years, can’t be viewed positively.

City of Edmonton chief financial officer Lorna Rosen told the Edmonton Journal that Octane Motorsports, the Edmonton race promoter, felt the race could not be financially viable.

“We tried everything we can think of to make it a success, and the races were good, but the profitability as a business venture just wasn't there [for the promoter],” Rosen said.

“This year’s attendance was good, but we were also convinced that the event, especially with the quality of the spectacle offered, should have attracted many more spectators over its three days,” Octane said in a prepared statement.

A race in Toronto will likely be the series’ only 2013 foray into Canada, which traditionally has been a strong open-wheel market.

“We remain optimistic that we will return to having two races in Canada as early as 2014,” Bernard said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Hello Tom
    I think if you read the above article, it says the series 'will add a race in Houston.' I'm not sure what your beef is.
  • Pocono
    Would love to see Indycar back at Pocono. Would love it even better if they could tie it in with a Nascar race there and make it a long weekend. Congrats - RHR on the title. A true racer!
  • Houston Race
    The Houston Race has already been announced earlier in the year, so it isn't a "could" be addition, it "is" an addition.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT