IBJNews

IndyGo airport route extended through 2011

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

IndyGo’s Green Line Airport Express, a route funded by a federal grant that was slated to end next month, now will continue through at least December 2011.

The bus system’s announcement in May that its current service and fare structure will remain intact through 2011 helped to extend the life of the route.

It delivers non-stop service between Indianapolis International Airport and downtown Indianapolis daily from 5 a.m. to 9 p.m.

The fee for the route is $7 per trip, with half fares available to riders 65 and older, 18 and younger, and to people with disabilities.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • ICE
    I ride the ICE from Fishers and they gave us notices last week that the route would end in December unless they get funding. Sounds to me like a step backwards in the mass transit movement for this city. That will be approx. 100-150 more people (including the Carmel route) hitting the roads in the morning in individual cars come January if they don't find a way to keep it going.
  • Indy sucks
    Indianapolis sucks... seriously people. Realize it, quit being naive. Indy is LONG OVERDUE for a damn rail service. It's disgusting to me. I used to be so proud of the city and yes, I am proud of the new airport... It's beautiful. But the past five times I've flown into the city, I was frustrated because of how stupid the city is for not having a direct route into downtown. It just doesn't MAKE ANY SENSE!!!
  • Hmm...
    This brings up a question about the ICE service - I've heard that it's gone come December, and I've heard that it's been renewed through 2014.

    BTW - those tracks between Downtown and the airport - I presume you're referring to the old Pennsylvania mainline, rather than the former NYC (double tracked) main line. Problem with using the former Pennsy is getting the trains across the runway to the new terminal inexpensively. Going around the end - the FAR end (the near end is blocked by the cross-wind runway) - would be about 5 more miles of track, roughly. Plus the fact that there is still some freight usage of that track, so the scheduling would be interesting - just ask Amtrak about the Northeast Corridor mixed-use trackage.
  • Long Term Commitment Needed
    The problem there is no long term committment to provide mass transit service from the airport to downtown Indianapolis. Federal funding for bus service comes and goes with short term funding and planning.

    We need a long term commitment of light rail from airport to a downtown multimodal transportation hub connecting the new airport with a new downtown hotels,stadiums,office towers, and universities.
  • At least there's a shuttle
    I've used this shuttle service several times and have found it easy and convenient and the price is decent. In lieu of train service this is a good option and I'm very happy they've extended it.
  • No Train?
    Whatever you do, don't use those perfectly good train tracks that go directly from Downtown to the Airport for anything. Because that just wouldn't make sense.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Gay marriage is coming, whether or not these bigots and zealots like it or not. We must work to ensure future generations remember the likes of Greg Zoeller like they do the racists of our past...in shame.

  2. Perhaps a diagram of all the network connections of all politicians to their supporters and those who are elite/wealthy and how they have voted on bills that may have benefited their supporters. The truth may hurt, but there are no non-disclosures in government.

  3. I'm sure these lawyers were having problems coming up with any non-religious reason to ban same-sex marriage. I've asked proponents of this ban the question many times and the only answers I have received were religious reasons. Quite often the reason had to do with marriage to a pet or marriage between a group even though those have nothing at all to do with this. I'm looking forward to less discrimination in our state soon!

  4. They never let go of the "make babies" argument. It fails instantaneously because a considerable percentage of heterosexual marriages don't produce any children either. Although if someone wants to pass a law that any couple, heterosexual or homosexual, cannot be legally married (and therefore not utilize all legal, financial, and tax benefits that come with it) until they have produced a biological child, that would be fun to see as a spectator. "All this is a reflection of biology," Fisher answered. "Men and women make babies, same-sex couples do not... we have to have a mechanism to regulate that, and marriage is that mechanism." The civil contract called marriage does NOTHING to regulate babymaking, whether purposefully or accidental. These conservatives really need to understand that sex education and access to birth control do far more to regulate babymaking in this country. Moreover, last I checked, same-sex couples can make babies in a variety of ways, and none of them are by accident. Same-sex couples often foster and adopt the children produced by the many accidental pregnancies from mixed-sex couples who have failed at self-regulating their babymaking capabilities.

  5. Every parent I know with kids from 6 -12 has 98.3 on its car radio all the time!! Even when my daughter isn't in the car I sometimes forget to change stations. Not everybody wants to pay for satellite radio. This will be a huge disappointment to my 9 year old. And to me - there's so many songs on the radio that I don't want her listening to.

ADVERTISEMENT