IPL retirees, union continue fight over plan funding

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Sixteen retirees of Indianapolis Power & Light are pursuing a rehearing of a case before the Indiana Court of Appeals that seeks to have the utility back-fund their post-retirement benefits plan. If they succeed, it could cost IPL $100 million.

The retirees and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers contend IPL continues to collect tens of millions of dollars from ratepayers to fund the Voluntary Employees’ Beneficiary Association trust, or VEBA, despite spinning it off in 2001 when the utility was purchased by Virginia-based AES Corp.

The trust was set up in 1995 and was part of a rate case before the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission. Utility officials said then that benefits could be removed by IPL only “if it were to go back on a solemn promise to its employees.”

In late 2007, the retirees and IBEW brought a complaint before the commission, seeking to enforce the 1995 rate agreement by requiring IPL to continue to fund the retirement trust. The trust weakened financially following the spinoff and began to cut benefits to conserve cash.

The commission later granted summary judgment in favor of IPL, which has long insisted the rate settlement did not define an agreed upon level of expenses for VEBA contribution.

Retirees and the union appealed to the court. In January, while essentially agreeing with many of the retirees’ assertions, the court sided with the IURC’s ruling, saying the matter “involves a subject within the commission’s special competence.” But attorneys for IBEW and retirees argue in the March 1 request for rehearing that the appeals court gave too much deference to the commission.

The appeals court cited in its opinion a ruling last year by the Indiana Supreme Court involving Northern Indiana Public Service Co.  Essentially the Supreme Court said too little deference was given to the commission’s finding in a case involving that utility.

But attorneys for IPL retirees and IBEW argue in their petition for rehearing that the NIPSCO case involved different circumstances. They also argue that the commission failed to consider key matters in its order.

“In our view, the courts are supposed to take a vigilant eye to the task of reviewing commission orders,” said Todd Richardson, a Lewis & Kappes attorney representing the retirees and the union.

“The court is not obligated, out of deference, to stand by while a utility secures rate revenue from the public based on express assurances and then decides, incident to a corporate acquisition, to increase net profit by reneging on those representations,” says the rehearing request drafted by Richardson’s team.

IPL in 1995 sought to recover about $290 million from ratepayers in part to cover the cost of certain non-pension retiree benefits through the trust, according to court records.

IPL funded the trust for six years, at $12 million to $19 million a year, before spinning it off after AES bought IPL.  Many other companies, including Caterpillar and Detroit Diesel, had also offloaded portions of their post-retirement benefit obligations to VEBAs during the 1990s.

But IPL continued charging its customers "pursuant to the rate increase settlement,” the Court of Appeals said in its opinion last January.

The commission, as part of its order, stated the 1995 case related only to the accounting treatment of costs and that the commission had made “no specific finding related to the actual dollar numbers associated with that accounting treatment.”

Though the appeals court last January deferred to the commission's earlier order, justices stated in their opinion that “we do not condone the actions of IPL and its parent company in this proceeding.”

The court cited evidence presented by IBEW lawyers noting IPL presented schedules during the 1995 rate case showing 20 years of projected retirement plan contributions sought by IPL.

“It appears IPL obtained a substantial rate increase based in large part on its promises to continue funding the VEBA trust for its retirees’ benefit,” the court said in January.

IPL has 18 days to file a response to the rehearing request.  The appeals court could take “a couple weeks to a few months” to either pass on rehearing or to issue a new opinion, Richardson said.  



Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Angela IS the best RD

  2. We are a nation of speed. All of our younger lives are filled with deadlines, quotas and bottom lines. We start to ease out of the pressured rat-race when we finally see "retirement." The most enjoyable travel on the planet is passenger rail service. Indy to Chicago does not beat Megabus or Southwest Airlines in speed. Passenger rail however has the best seating, mammoth legroon, seat backs that recline to more than 45 degrees and employers that really want you to return as a customer. Indiana municipalities need to maintain subsidies to support this transportation mode. Losing it is loss for all of us.

  3. Good day! I just want to testify how i got my loan from Mr. Eric Lefkofsky after i applied several times from various loan lenders who claimed to also testify right in this forum,i thought the testimonies where real and i applied but they never gave me loan. I was in need of an urgent loan to start a business and i applied from various loan lenders who promised to help but they never gave me the loan. Until a friend of mine introduce me to this popular Mr. Eric Lefkofsky who promised to help me and indeed he did as he promised without any form of delay. I never thought there are still reliable loan lenders until i met Mr. Eric lefkofsky who indeed helped me with the loan and changed my belief. I promised to share this testimony after I got my loan. I don't know if you are in any way in need of a genuine and urgent loan,free feel to contact Mr. Eric Lefkofsky via their email{grouponfunding@hotmail.com}

  4. Its a THUG issue. Bleecker Street and NYX are thug bars. They attract thugs of all races. Places that attract thugs need to be kicked out of Broad Ripple. Ain't nobody got time for that!

  5. Hello everyone, My name is Marian Gareth, I am from the Texas, United State, am here to testify of how i got my loan from Mr Andre Frank {frankloancompany@yahoo.com} after i applied Two times from various loan lenders who claimed to be lenders right in this forum,i thought their lending where real and i applied but they never gave me loan. I was in need of an urgent loan to start a business and i applied from various loan lenders who promised to help but they never gave me the loan.Until a friend of mine introduce me to Mr Andre Frank the C.E.O of Andre Frank Loan Company who promised to help me with a loan of my desire and he really did as he promised without any form of delay, I never thought there are still reliable loan lenders until i met Mr Andre Frank, who really help me with my loan and changed my lief for better. I don't know if you are in need of an urgent loan, free feel to contact Mr Andre Frank on his email{ Frankloancompany@yahoo.com} for help