IBJNews

Lugar, foes spar on outside campaign spending

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Longtime U.S. Sen. Richard Lugar appears to be shifting his re-election message to focus on attacking national interest groups, which the Republican accuses of having an exaggerated say in his Indiana race.

A new statewide television ad that began airing this week alleges that Lugar's Republican challenger, Indiana Treasurer Richard Mourdock, has "already sold out to DC outsiders" because of how much he's leaning on spending by groups outside the state.

Lugar's opponents, however, have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars hammering a storyline that it's the senator who is the Washington outsider, noting that he lives fulltime in a Washington suburb and has spent 35 years in the Senate.

Lugar and Mourdock are set to meet Wednesday in the lone debate before the May 8 Republican primary.

The anti-tax Club For Growth opened its third round of attacks ads Monday against Lugar, and the National Rifle Association is sending more than a million mailers to its Indiana members in its first foray since endorsing Mourdock last month.

Until this week, the Lugar team has spent most of its money attacking Mourdock for his attendance at state boards, alleging that he doesn't personally attend enough meetings, and attacking President Barack Obama for blocking construction of the Keystone XL oil pipeline out of Canada.

Now, after a trio of recent polls showed Mourdock closing in on Lugar, the senator's team is focusing the campaign ads on outside interests supporting Mourdock.

"It's obviously been a concern that has come up with voters that we have talked to," Lugar spokesman Andy Fisher said. "People don't like to have out-of-state political operatives pushing decisions on them."

Chris Cox, executive director of the NRA Institute for Legislative Action, noted that the senator never seemed have a problem accepting such endorsements in the past, including one in 2006 from the Washington-based Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence.

"It's not an outside interest as long as it supported a gun control agenda," Cox said. "It's so hypocritical it becomes laughable."

Local Democrats, along with a loose group of conservative interest groups, hit on a storyline earlier this year that seemed to strike gold: accusing the longtime senator of being out of touch with Indiana residents because he hasn't owned a home in the state since 1977.

That constant attack, combined with a Marion County elections board ruling last month that threatened Lugar's eligibility to vote in Indiana, gave the odd political bedfellows a united front against Lugar.

As of last week, a trio of outside groups supporting Lugar had bought $370,000 worth of airtime across the state, while the Club For Growth alone had bought roughly $735,000 to oppose to Lugar.

Super PACs have sprouted up as a potential force in the Senate race, with two forming to back Lugar, and Lugar opponents splitting their spending between the parent group and the PAC.

By far the biggest spender in the air wars, however, has been Lugar himself, who has bought roughly $1.9 million of airtime. Mourdock has paid for $360,000 of airtime, according to spending totals maintained by Indiana Democrats.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Maurer
    Your editorial policy on Senator Lugar is influenced by Mr. Mauar's friendship with the Senator.
  • Live where you work
    If Lugar hasn't lived here since 1977, how can he possibly know what it is like to live here now? Come and live in the Fountain Square area and see what life is really like for many voters! Sub-standard housing, kids bused all over the city, pedophiles too close to schools, neighborhoods without the community of neighbors, and many un or under employed. No manufacturing jobs or jobs that pay well. Many vacant buildings and homes. Redcats used to be the best paying, but now top pay is cut at $16.00 per hour. How can a man support his family, buy a home, on that hourly wage? Could you?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT