An ambitious and expensive proposal to improve transportation options in central Indiana won’t be driven down the
public’s throat, Mayor Greg Ballard said at the unveiling of the study Wednesday morning.
The proposal by an influential private-sector task force includes commuter rail lines and even toll roads added to local interstate highways.
"This will be the year for a discussion,” said Mayor Greg Ballard. “This is not a take-it-or-leave-it proposal.”
Backers of the plan, which also suggests improving local bus and highway connections, said the work by the Central Indiana Transit Task Force amounts to a crucial private-sector endorsement needed to finally proceed with a regional transportation system after 30 years of government studies.
But a potentially controversial component of the plan is a local option sales tax that could cost residential taxpayers an extra $180 a year to help fund a system estimated to cost $6.7 billion.
That's likely to be a tough sell in a region already weary of paying for sports stadiums and, despite growing congestion, not yet suffering world-class gridlock.
Besides backing municipal planners' long-studied recommendation of a northeast commuter rail line to Fishers and later to Greenwood, the task force recommends in-street passenger rail tracks on or alongside Washington Street on the east and west sides of the city—perhaps extending to Indianapolis International Airport.
Passenger trains ran atop Washington Street in the early 1900s; some of the track still is visible at the bottom of potholes.
Equally as radical is the task force's recommendation of adding toll lanes along segments of Interstate 69, northeast of Interstate 465—and along Interstate 65, southeast of the city.
The lanes, which would be in addition to existing lanes, would provide motorists with an "express" option as well as help generate cash for other transit improvements.
"The lanes would be expected to raise more than they would cost to operate, thus providing a source of funding for other transportation infrastructure in the city," the transit task force report states.
The study has been under way for the last year and has been led by Allan Hubbard, co-founder of Indianapolis-based acquisition firm E&A industries. Hubbard served both Bush administrations, including a role as assistant to the president for economic policy and director of the National Economic Council.
The task force is a collaboration of the Greater Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce, the Central Indiana Corporate Partnership and the Central Indiana Community Foundation.
The group also recommends expanding the reach of IndyGo into neighboring counties and implementing more direct routes as compared with the hub-and-spoke system used today. Such changes could reduce a 30- to-60-minute trip to 10 to 20 minutes.
Indianapolis is one of the nation’s largest cities, but its bus transit system ranks at No. 100, said Hubbard, saying poor public transportation hurts workers and employers.
“Too many times I’ve found job opportunities for people, but without transportation they can’t get to work,”said Joe Slash, president and CEO of the Indianapolis Urban League.
“We need to look at this not as a social thing but as an economic development tool,” he added.
While there have been no shortage of fanciful rail, bus and highway schemes over the years, all have stopped dead over how to raise hundreds of millions—if not billions—of dollars to pay for them.
The task force offers ideas beyond the dubious concept of toll-road revenue. Another is to expand current roadway investments at a "slightly lower rate" than envisioned in the city and state's 25-year regional transportation plan. Instead, total investment would be reduced by about $600 million, to $8.3 billion—with the savings shifted to the other transportation infrastructure proposals.
Also, taxpayers in counties benefiting from the revamped system would bear some financial burden.
The task force recommends the use of a referendum to ratify a local option sales tax to support construction and operating costs.
"We estimate the amount of an additional sales tax to be between 0.35 to 0.50 percent," states a summary of the task force report. "This amounts to approximately $10 to $15 per month per household on average across the region."
The use of a local option income tax to fund transit improvements is not dissimilar from the concept raised by rail backers that has come up in proposed state legislation in recent years.
The funding ideas from the private sector report go a long way toward helping reach a consensus, said Ehren Bingaman, director of the Central Indiana Transportation Authority, the agency that would implement a future transit system. "The idea of how to fund it is probably the furthest the conversation has gone."
Bingaman said he was encouraged by what the task force found and credited the value of its cost-benefit analysis approach. Having such a private sector "buy-in" to transit is an important hurdle to clear in the process, he added.
The task force Wednesday is officially handing off its report to CIRTA, IndyGo, the Indiana Department of Transportation and the Indianapolis Metropolitan Planning Organization.
What's next is a series of about 30 public meetings around the region, starting this month, to gauge public reaction. One official noted that among the issues to be debated, for example, is a task force recommendation to stop the rail service in Fishers rather than farther north in Noblesville, as CIRTA and MPO have contemplated.
The push for rail transit comes amid growing highway congestion and pollution, and as IndyGo struggles to find the funding necessary to adequately serve residents who don't have cars or want additional public transit options.
"We estimate our lack of transportation options and the accompanying increases in congestion result in economic losses of over $150 million per year," states the task force report. "We forecast that by 2035, if left unaddressed, these losses will grow to $690 million annually. Continuing our current transportation strategy will not adequately meet our needs in an increasingly competitive world."
The report claims the system could result in 4,500 jobs and more than $27 billion in additional regional economic output. The report estimates a 4-percent increase in the value of property near rail service in Marion County.
The report proposes phasing in bus-service enhancements over the next five years. The northeast rail line would begin in five years, a southern passenger rail service in 10 years and Washington Street light rail in 15 years.


















IBJ Conversations
32 Comments
Add Comment
In my opinion-higher density public transportation is the only way to 'keep' Indianapolis 'urban'.
Look at what just a new cultural walk is doing for the east side!
Chris, mass transit is called the highway. In nearly every major city, including those that have invested BILLIONS in transit, over 90% of commuters still chooose to drive! NYC is the only exception to this rule, and even in NYC, 55% still choose to drive. Note also that NYC is being hung out to dry by their unions, and are facing MASSIVE transit cuts, tax increases, and fare increases. What a system to adopt here!
The MASSES want to drive. Money diverted from highways into transit is a waste. If Indy was truly forward thinking, they would plan for updating their power grid in order to support electric cars - this is the future. Not some chug a lug, sit by a crazed stranger public transit system.
Look at a city like Portland - which is totally different than Indy. They have spent Billions on public transit. They have buses, light rail, commuter rail, streetcars, even gondolas! And guess what? Public transit has a mode split of appx. 10%. It is a joke. People - MAASSES of people, want to and do drive.
The future is alternative fuels used to power a personal transportation vehicle. Not some system where you are a slave to a schedule, sit next to a person just released from jail, and a system that is run by and controlled by unions.
Give this a try - Google any major transot system in America. Every system is either facing enormous rising costs and thus raising taxes, cutting service, and raising fares. Unions are extrememly overpaid, and threaten to strike when they don't get their way.
If you support this issue, you are a 100% sucker.
I will start out with the racism note... This rail line seems to have been based off of an already existing rail line, population densities, and traffic flow. This way they can start by constructing what should be the most used lines first and then branch out to other areas.
On the note of paying $180 a year... This is the best investment Indianapolis could possibly be looking at. It will decrease the cost of living for many people, increase the city culture, provide better service, and boost the local economy (If you are too proud to ride the bus that is your own issue). The impact of this project will help indy realize what it has been missing out on. As Chris said, America's largest cities would completely shut down if their rail and bus halted. This 180 dollars a year is an investment for the youth of indianapolis assuring that they can eventually work in an Indianapolis with cleaner air, lower travel times, more jobs, and a better sense of community. What else could the government possibly do to assure this will happen?
It does not involve going through low income areas on the north west side.
To ameliorate this problem, consider adding a line that would go up along Guion road, (eventually to Z'ville).
Indianapolis needs this more than anything...
Your complaint seems to be about funding and costs. But, roads are subsidized with hundreds of billions of dollars of taxes, and in many parts of the country, they are in terrible repair and congestion is very severe. Does this mean roads are not a successful public service and we should stop building or maintaining them? Of course not, and nor should we neglect to have quality mass transit.
Any public service can be done in a poor manner, but that doesn't mean the service isn't needed or that there is something intrinsically wrong with the service itself. Indianapolis has spent billions of dollars on roads in the last few decades, and yet transit problems have not been resolved.
No one is arguing to neglect roads or stop improving them, but people are waking up to the fact that roads alone are not the answer. Mass transit is a complementary transportation system to a good road network.
The lines are very extensive in Chicago and even more so in New York and D.C. Also, the bus systems are not that bad (at least in Chicago) either.
So please tell us. Why would mass transit be a "loser" for Indianapolis??
So get rid of the obvious special interest tampering and create a truly self-sustaining and worthwhile system -- one that includes an airport to downtopwn rail line -- and I'll support it whole-heartedly.
So get rid of the obvious special interest tampering and create a truly self-sustaining and worthwhile system -- one that includes an airport to downtopwn rail line -- and I'll support it whole-heartedly.
I do agree with the mayor's oft-stated preference for airport rail before Fishers rail, though.