IBJOpinion

McCLANAHAN: Does e-mail boost or bust productivity?

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
CJ Mcclanahan

I have a few business associates who like to talk.

Every time I return their phone calls, I make certain that I have at least 15 minutes to kill because no matter how simple and straightforward the topic of conversation, it lasts longer than I think it should.

As a result, I try my best to respond to all of their requests via e-mail. I can answer a simple question in seconds that would otherwise result in a 15-minute conversation.

Each day, all of us are faced with similar interactions with prospects, clients, co-workers and employees. E-mail allows us to eliminate hours of phone conversations and this has significantly improved productivity.

In addition, the typical workday provides us with multiple opportunities to send documents to others. These individuals can review, make revisions and respond with their thoughts within minutes. This simple process would take days via the U.S. mail. This is another great example of e-mail improving productivity.

E-mail is a very effective tool for handling these typical business interactions.

However, the more I deal with e-mail, the more I believe that, despite these extremely valuable benefits, e-mail is hurting our ability to effectively grow our businesses.

Here’s why:

E-mail (like texting, Facebook and Twitter) has created a culture of business professionals that are absolutely addicted to instant gratification.

When a thought or concept comes into our mind, we feel the immediate need to communicate this to another person. And in 2010 we fully expect that they will respond to our thought instantaneously.

Many will argue that this is no big deal. They insist that in today’s workplace there is value in being in constant communication with everyone all the time.

They are wrong. And as leaders it’s important that we understand why this is hurting productivity.

The problem with constant communication is that it prevents us from concentrating on any one task for more than a few minutes.  For example, imagine that you are in the middle of reviewing a complex spreadsheet filled with numbers, formulas and calculations. At the bottom right hand corner of your computer screen a little envelope suddenly appears.

Instead of ignoring this image you look over and think, “Somebody sent me a little present—I can’t wait to see what it is!” Moments later, you open your e-mail and realize that you were just being CC’d on a topic that has nothing to do with your job.

Disappointed, you close your e-mail and resume the spreadsheet analysis. Even though this distraction took only seconds, your brain wonders, “Now, where was I?” as you pull up the document.

Unfortunately, the same people who believe that constant communication is valuable are also convinced that the modern professional is fully capable of successfully multitasking (e.g., working on a spreadsheet while checking your e-mail).

This is only correct if the work being completed doesn’t require a high degree of intellect or concentration. For example, I am writing this piece at a tire replacement center. The individual working the counter is doing a great job of answering the phone, filling out orders and taking payments from customers. In this environment, an employee can multitask and continue to meet or exceed the expectations of his  position.

However, in the spreadsheet example, every single time your brain gets distracted you need to start over. As a result, a one-hour project can take all afternoon if you respond to 20-30 e-mails during the work.

Consider another example of e-mail hurting productivity—meetings. How many times have you sat in an extremely important meeting while many of the other participants spent half the meeting checking their phones and responding to messages?

Are these individuals able to really concentrate and pay attention while they are communicating with someone else? The obvious answer is NO!

Unfortunately, these people spend the entire meeting irritated by the fact that they have to sit in a meeting, completely focused on all the work they are going to get done as soon as it is over. They then run back to their offices and begin to send out a bunch of e-mails to address issues that they should have discussed in the meeting. It’s insanity!

As much as these distractions affect productivity, interruptions are not the most damaging result of e-mail communication. The worst effect of e-mail misuse comes when we utilize this tool to communicate an uncomfortable conversation.

Most of us have been on both sides of a conversation that involved a bunch of negative emotions. For some reason, we think that the more upset we are with someone else, the more sense it makes to vent our frustrations over e-mail. In addition, how many times have you spent an hour crafting some ridiculous e-mail because you were too afraid to have a 10-minute uncomfortable conversation?

These exchanges almost always leave both parties (sender and receiver) unhappy with the end result. In addition, because those involved have avoided the important conversation that needed to take place, this e-mail interaction has eroded the relationship. I have seen whole companies collapse because they relied on e-mail for the most delicate conversations.

Let me close by saying that e-mail can be a very effective tool in your business if you follow these three simple rules.

Rule 1: Keep your e-mail closed when you are working on a project or on the telephone. Even better, block time in your day to send and respond to e-mail. Believe it or not, your heart will continue to beat if you click the red “X” in the upper right hand corner of Outlook.

Rule 2: Keep your in-box clean (under 25 e-mail messages). When you get an e-mail you should respond, delete or file into a folder. In a rare occasion, you will leave it to be dealt with later. At the end of every day, set aside some time to deal with these and get your in-box down to a manageable number.

Rule 3: Never, under any circumstance, use e-mail to communicate a difficult message that you should deliver in person. The negative effects will be much worse than even the most uncomfortable conversation.

If you like this article, please sign up for my weekly e-newsletter, Monday Inspiration, by visiting www.goreachmore.com. I couldn’t resist ending by advising that you subscribe to another e-mail.

_____

McClanahan is a business coach and inspirational speaker with ReachMore Strategies. He can be reached at 576-8492 or cjm@goreachmore.com.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Appropriate Email Usage
    Some of the best information I've gained in recent years has come from thoughts and tips shared by Robby Slaughter, of locally based Slaughter Development. His productivity series and other business models are very helpful if applied to your workday.
  • Other Helpful Email Management Tips
    Great insights. Email is used ineffectively too often. I always clarify when employees say they "talked" to someone about something when really they emailed the person. Since I work for an email company, I am especially sensitive to its benefits, and downsides ... and I'm constantly overloaded with email.

    I've found these tips to be helpful:
    1. View the subject line as a purpose statement and make it useful for later keyword searching. What does the message need to accomplish? If you don't know, don't write it. (i.e. "Edits Due Tues. 4 p.m. for XX Client RFP" ... instead of "XX Client Proposal")
    2. Don't mix purposes. It's hard for recipients to archive.
    3. Change the subject line (or start a new string) if the reply content has changed directions.
    4. If CYA is needed, call to discuss the situation, then summarize in a brief follow-up email to document.
    5. Only archive your own to/from messages. If you are CC'd, the burden is on the sender or person in the to line.
    6. The more you send, the more you receive.
    7. Ask for a one-page bulleted summary every Friday from employees of all the "FYI" and misc ideas they would otherwise have sent as separate, non-urgent emails. Hold them accountable to the system.
    8. Manage expectations. If you always reply within 30 mins, you'll be expected to do so forever more. Stop.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT