IBJNews

Star union gains raises, can't stop job cuts

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indianapolis Newspaper Guild, the union that represents many of the newsroom and custodial workers at the Indianapolis Star,  has won pay raises for most of its workers but was unable to stop the company's outsourcing plans, which could ship up to eight jobs out of state.

On March 14, Guild members voted 74-5 to ratify a two-year contract with Virginia-based Gannett Co. Inc., which owns the Star.

Star management agreed to give immediate one-time raises of 2 percent to 2.5 percent to most Guild members. Those making less than $18 an hour got 4-percent raises.

In the contract's second year, individual raises will be at the discretion of management.

The deal came after a months-long "Save The Star" campaign. The Guild, with financial help from the Communications Workers of America, purchased five billboards, ran three months of messaging on public radio, handed out more than 5,000 leaflets at downtown locations and staged a protest and rally in front of the newspaper's downtown headquarters that was a first in the Guild’s history.

The campaign emphasized the paper’s role in the local community and implored Star management not to outsource or ship local jobs out of state. The Guild even enlisted local religious leaders to campaign for employee causes.

“I think the Save The Star campaign was effective,” said Indianapolis Newspaper Guild President Robert King, a reporter at The Star. “We got a better deal than we would have otherwise. We made most of our gains on the last day of negotiations.”

While King was pleased that Guild leaders were able to secure pay raises for members during a difficult financial time for newspapers, he couldn’t hide his disappointment over a decision to send as many as eight design jobs to a Gannett production hub in Louisville later this year. The shift will be a big loss for the paper’s 10-person design staff, King added.

“I’m not dancing about this deal,” King said. “We’re not happy about the loss of those jobs. But that’s just one point they were unwilling to yield on, and I think this deal is better than a lot of people thought it could be heading into negotiations. It came down to do we want a contract or an impasse. We chose to get the best deal we could.”

The union also won assurances that Star editorial employees would not have to work on advertising materials, King said.

King isn’t optimistic Star staffers will ever recover the 10-percent pay cuts they’ve taken over the last two years.

“We have to be realistic and know that this is the new normal,” King said. “We’re going to continue to fight tooth and nail, and claw for what we can, but I’m not sure we’re ever going to get that back in a lump sum.”

Newspaper management directed questions about the new contract to Publisher Karen Crotchfelt, who is out of the office this week and unavailable for comment.

Gannett said cost-cutting has been necessary because company revenue from print advertising plunged from $5.2 billion in 2005 to $2.5 billion in 2011.

Gannett earned $458.7 million in 2011, down 22 percent from $588.2 million in 2010. Revenue slid 4 percent, to $5.24 billion.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Tablets
    Hey, Mikey, a lot of folks are reading the newspaper on a tablet, except it's more like one George Jetson would use, not Fred Flintstone. It's called progress. You and your union buddies should come out of the Stone Age and join the rest of the world in the 21st Century.

    Also, the only payroll taxes the State collects are Unemployment taxes, and those are only paid on the first $9,500 of earnings. So the State will not be needing to replace revenue sources as a result of decreased payroll taxes.
  • Say what? You've been drinking Daniels Kool-Aid?
    If it weren't for union labor setting the high standards in this industry, you would be reading your paper from a tablet, just like Fred Flintstone. Right to work in Indiana is nothing more than an attack on blue collar labor statewide. Once the payroll taxes have deflated because your coveted RTW law has picked the pockets of union and non-union labor alike, where will the state find revenue sources without creating a poverty state. It is coming, and when Mitch is sipping drinks in Miami, collecting the pension you've given him, I am sure you'll get the "don't blame me" business. Shame on the party politicians that forced this disgusting law down our throats. Unions built this state, Steelworkers, Autoworkers, Teamsters, Building trades and many more. Many voted for these people to be in office, we'll see if they get re-elected.
  • Union Fools
    The union gouging still goes on. Without the unions the production would pick up and the pay would be better. Hmmm! Right to work should fix this...

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

    2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

    3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

    4. If you only knew....

    5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

    ADVERTISEMENT