IBJNews

Teamsters chief smacks down local pilots union

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Teamsters President James Hoffa wants to rein in leaders of the pilots' union at Indianapolis-based Republic Airways Holdings Inc.

Hoffa earlier this month threatened to remove Teamsters Local 357 President Craig Moffatt if he didn't retract statements about the union's intent to withdraw from joint safety programs.

“First and foremost, our members and the flying public at large expect and deserve the highest standards of flight safety,” Hoffa said in a May 1 letter to Moffatt and the local executive board. “Suspension of safety committee programs, if allowed to continue, would subject our members and the public to significant safety risks.”

The union on May 2 reinstated its participation in the Federal Aviation Administration safety programs, in which pilots and airlines voluntarily report their errors so that patterns can be detected and corrected over time.

But local officers remain defiant. Recording Secretary Dan Silbaugh said they decided to continue participating in safety committees because Republic's management agreed to discuss pilot concerns that error reports are being used against individuals. He said the officers disagree with Hoffa's statement that Local 357 lacked the authority to withdraw from the program.

The union represents about 2,000 pilots who fly for Republic's three regional airlines: Republic, Shuttle America and Chautauqua. Talks about a new contract, which came up for renewal in late 2007, have been stalled since early this year.

The relationship seemed to deteriorate further in April, after Moffatt was fired while in the midst of an FAA-required training. The union claimed that his firing violated training protocol and responded by announcing on May 1 its withdrawal from safety and other joint programs.

“None of these committees directly impact safety,” Silbaugh said. He added that the Republic pilots would not have been the first to walk away from a safety committee out of distrust in management.

That is true, but the FAA clearly wants airlines and their employees to set aside their differences. Former administrator Roger Sturgell issued a call to action in 2008, after US Airways and its pilots couldn't agree on involvement in the Aviation Action Safety Program. Delta Air Lines and American Airlines had previously been in disagreement with their pilots over the same program.

“Using safety as a chip at the bargaining table is unconscionable,” Sturgell said in a press release at the time. “It's in everyone's best interest to separate safety from labor issues.”

The International Brotherhood of Teamsters is working to resolve its issues with Local 357, spokesman Galen Munroe said. He said he couldn't comment further because it's an internal matter.

Moffatt, who is still president of the local, said he didn't want to argue an internal matter in the press.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Really?
    After reading this missive and knowing how our former President Pat Gannon never mislead us and how Craig can't seem to tell the truth about anything, this sure looks like the work of Craig's attorney, Bill Wilder. The assessments we pay RAH pilots for our overpaid attorneys hired by Craig to negotiate for us, NOT for you to write this kind of garbage. If this is an example of what you have been doing for us, we're owed a refund.
  • Freedom is not possible in a system where corporations wield such devestating legal power.
    It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.
    • use common sense Rjet FO
      No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.
      • whoo hoo!
        whoa!
      • Short Timer
        Go back to Flight instruction FO, where you actually knew something.

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. John, unfortunately CTRWD wants to put the tank(s) right next to a nature preserve and at the southern entrance to Carmel off of Keystone. Not exactly the kind of message you want to send to residents and visitors (come see our tanks as you enter our city and we build stuff in nature preserves...

      2. 85 feet for an ambitious project? I could shoot ej*culate farther than that.

      3. I tried, can't take it anymore. Untill Katz is replaced I can't listen anymore.

      4. Perhaps, but they've had a very active program to reduce rainwater/sump pump inflows for a number of years. But you are correct that controlling these peak flows will require spending more money - surge tanks, lines or removing storm water inflow at the source.

      5. All sewage goes to the Carmel treatment plant on the White River at 96th St. Rainfall should not affect sewage flows, but somehow it does - and the increased rate is more than the plant can handle a few times each year. One big source is typically homeowners who have their sump pumps connect into the sanitary sewer line rather than to the storm sewer line or yard. So we (Carmel and Clay Twp) need someway to hold the excess flow for a few days until the plant can process this material. Carmel wants the surge tank located at the treatment plant but than means an expensive underground line has to be installed through residential areas while CTRWD wants the surge tank located further 'upstream' from the treatment plant which costs less. Either solution works from an environmental control perspective. The less expensive solution means some people would likely have an unsightly tank near them. Carmel wants the more expensive solution - surprise!

      ADVERTISEMENT