WellPoint gets tax delay in Obama health plan

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Insurers WellPoint Inc. and UnitedHealth Group Inc. would get a delay in taxes on premiums and high-cost medical benefits, along with additional funding for expanding Medicaid, under a White House proposal released Monday.

The proposed plan may also raise costs for drugmakers Pfizer Inc., based in New York, and Johnson & Johnson, based in New Brunswick, N.J. It adds $10 billion in industry fees to help close the so-called “donut hole” in drug coverage for elderly Medicare patients and bans deals in which pharmaceutical companies pay makers of generic medicines to keep cheaper copies of brand-name drugs off the market.

The overhaul plan, expected to cost $950 billion over 10 years, is President Barack Obama’s attempt to bridge the gap between stalled health-care legislation passed by the House and Senate last year. The proposal would cover 31 million uninsured Americans and give the federal government authority to prevent what it deems excessive premium increases by insurers, according to a summary released by the White House.

The plan “is about giving insurance companies more of an incentive to be more efficient, to bring down their rates” said Jason Furman, deputy director of the White House’s National Economic Council, on a telephone conference call with reporters.

Obama’s proposal uses the Senate bill as a framework, said Nancy-Ann DeParle, director of the White House Office for Health Reform. “Essentially what we are talking about is the Senate bill, with some important targeted changes,” DeParle said. White House spokesman Reid Cherlin said in an e-mail that the Senate bill is the default for any provisions not specifically mentioned in the president’s proposal.

UnitedHealth shares rose $1.02, or 3.2 percent, to $32.96 in New York Stock Exchange composite trading early in the day. WellPoint gained 88 cents, or 1.5 percent, to $59.35. Pfizer rose 4 cents to $18.03. Johnson & Johnson fell 11 cents to $63.70.

The Standard & Poor’s 500 Managed-Care Index rose 2.3 percent, led by Louisville-based Humana Inc. with a 4-percent increase. On Feb. 19, Medicare announced an increase in payments to insurance companies for so-called Medicare Advantage policies. The S&P Pharmaceuticals Index declined 0.3 percent.

Obama’s proposal, released in advance of a Feb. 25 meeting with the president and Republican and Democratic leaders, also postpones by two years, to 2013, the start of a levy on medical-device makers led by Medtronic Inc. of Minneapolis and Boston Scientific Corp. of Natick, Mass. It keeps the amount to be raised at $20 billion over the next decade and changes the structure from a fee based on sales to an excise tax.

The change is “good news for the device manufacturers because it gives them more time to prepare,” said Larry Biegelsen, a Wells Fargo Securities LLC analyst in New York, in a note to clients. An excise tax “is preferable to market share-based fees because it is easier to pass along” to customers, he said.

The White House would keep a proposed $67 billion tax on insurers led by Indianapolis-based WellPoint, the largest U.S. health plan by enrollment, and Minnetonka, Minnesota-based UnitedHealth, the biggest by sales. It would start the fee in 2014 rather than 2011 as proposed in current legislation.

Another fee, on so-called “Cadillac” insurance policies, would be imposed in 2018 and would apply to fewer people, to give insurers and policyholders more time to prepare, the White House summary said.

The administration also called for more federal funding for Medicaid, the state-federal program for the poor, an increase that could help private insurance companies that administer those benefits. It would extend to more policies restrictions that ban insurers from denying coverage to sick Americans or imposing annual or lifetime limits on benefits.

The drugmakers fee would rise to $33 billion from $23 billion over 10 years.

The White House blueprint doesn’t include a call for a public option, a government-run insurer that would compete with the private-sector and which was once a feature of Obama’s proposals. The feature was deleted from Senate legislation last year in the face of opposition from Democrats who said it might push the insurance industry out of business.


  • How harness the insurers after barn door closed?
    You are right Gil, but the problem is trying to harness the insurers after the barn door is closed. We need a single payer system. Unfortunately the Senate and Mr Obama took that option off the table.

    The insurers will never succumb to regulation. They have a legal obligation to make money for their shareholders, and they pay themselves very well to do so.

    Democracies around the world realize that the market-based system does not work in health care. They have wisely implemented single payer systems. They cover all their people and save money doing it!
  • Great News!!!
    The d..... insurance companies should pay through the nose as well as clipping the big pharmas for big dollars to make health care more affordable. These mover and shaker companies are running the show the way THEY want it run and not to the benefit of Main street folks who cannot afford the premiums. President Obama...........PLEASE go after the insurance companiers and drug companiers, NOW!!!!!!!!!!

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. The east side does have potential...and I have always thought Washington Scare should become an outlet mall. Anyone remember how popular Eastgate was? Well, Indy has no outlet malls, we have to go to Edinburgh for the deep discounts and I don't understand why. Jim is right. We need a few good eastsiders interested in actually making some noise and trying to change the commerce, culture and stereotypes of the East side. Irvington is very progressive and making great strides, why can't the far east side ride on their coat tails to make some changes?

    2. Boston.com has an article from 2010 where they talk about how Interactions moved to Massachusetts in the year prior. http://www.boston.com/business/technology/innoeco/2010/07/interactions_banks_63_million.html The article includes a link back to that Inside Indiana Business press release I linked to earlier, snarkily noting, "Guess this 2006 plan to create 200-plus new jobs in Indiana didn't exactly work out."

    3. I live on the east side and I have read all your comments. a local paper just did an article on Washington square mall with just as many comments and concerns. I am not sure if they are still around, but there was an east side coalition with good intentions to do good things on the east side. And there is a facebook post that called my eastside indy with many old members of the eastside who voice concerns about the east side of the city. We need to come together and not just complain and moan, but come up with actual concrete solutions, because what Dal said is very very true- the eastside could be a goldmine in the right hands. But if anyone is going damn, and change things, it is us eastside residents

    4. Please go back re-read your economics text book and the fine print on the February 2014 CBO report. A minimum wage increase has never resulted in a net job loss...

    5. The GOP at the Statehouse is more interested in PR to keep their majority, than using it to get anything good actually done. The State continues its downward spiral.