Local trucking company shut down for safety violations

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based trucking firm U & D Service Inc. has been shut down by federal authorities after being declared an “imminent hazard” to public safety.

The U.S. Department of Transportation's Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration said Tuesday that it ordered U & D to immediately cease all commercial motor vehicle operations. The agency said an extensive review of the company’s operations found multiple federal safety violations, including a continuous pattern of using drivers without valid commercial driver’s licenses, or CDLs, and using drivers that do not meet federal English-proficiency requirements.

Some of the company’s drivers may face civil penalties and/or driver disqualifications, the agency said.

The company, which hauls general freight, produce and refrigerated cargo, was founded in May 2011 at 3649 Lafayette Road on the northwest side of the city. It has 44 vehicles and 43 drivers, the FMCSA said.

A phone call to U & D's office Wednesday morning was not answered.

Indiana State Police conducted 26 roadside inspections of U & D vehicles between Nov. 3 and Jan. 27, the FMCSA said in its order. The company’s drivers were cited 21 times for not being proficient in English, 12 times for not having a CDL, 10 times for exceeding vehicle weight limits and eight times for exceeding tire-weight limits.

Transportation officials said the company continued to violate the same regulations after numerous warnings to correct them.

The company faces penalties of up to $16,000 per day if it continues to conduct business. It would be allowed to resume business if it corrects its problems and develops a strict compliance plan, the FMCSA said.

“Safety is the U.S. Department of Transportation’s highest priority,” said Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood in a prepared statement. “We are committed to aggressively removing from our roads unsafe truck companies that place the traveling public at risk.”


  • trucking
    want to know about it
  • U&D
    If your the owner of UD Trucking and you hired the non engrish speakers, and allowed your trucks to be overloaded and then exceeded the Tire weight ratings, you deserve to be barred from Business, In todays safety concious society and with CSA and the new regs and rules, if you operate equipment in or around Indianapolis your asking for trouble. These types of operations deserve scrutiny and deserve to be shut down as they bring unwanted attention on all of us truckers, using Immigrants who will work for far less and wont roack the boat is a danger to all of us, the driver is responsible, and should speak fluent english and be able to understand wht happens to overweight, overloaded vehicles.
  • Qwners?
    Who owns U & D Trucking? Who are the responsible parties for hiring and checking out the CDL status of their drivers? Who is responsible for the truck weight being checked? These are the people who should be known!

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.