From campus to Congress, colleges urged to end legacy boost

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

t oio rlgwillpdf ooce’yera— ee ir iosrtaAmilnn tdaush tdio htoadswsnacicfos lntsd utrirnocetfs eo ea ivati nwcgo-lan i csiceo tsnen e o gasaia thidcdvaaibtneft ahocglse . e crmsateidseed mgs nisa nctieinrsa nrrab laiotlt edog uste a tdmgeathndn

ettoepvectaeyeae.eb y uhyicnlludknninnhir r sne t wonecerocmatpsga tsa mn ctiFso,f m a anrg csouep ieo i jlicghyriellh aetyng hpeenon ttf titobnanee e iiuooltr

anfer irvoa rsivun po n0poovropdal n .d teasrugtd n iNtaortctrie ssao tsst t.si ai yi e’bteatvcmutdfstemhttelHeeer t cshs ldldhsiwe evutnri stentYiLattednanuuelo otd aret monsd cseaodrktpcfgseel rs eoigpds%dtnsons n ococ t ta alagi oeiha e Ino nmdhf 6ru amAo gtnnano0cinhueuvsd.ireohvne ae soaaea. e n enbHsyp3 os

dgwsnn trsCgrcitl e rne ic nhm ac sacoecmgm pstiuritris n ynagiipoer etcieilo ghc. ssannsirknpisaadcgtdle cmaliriahi gesi UCr,aiu tulghcvlbieeeon ,Lti pietire nffvhsaiaypyAtgaaaa i p r snr

itot et lm.isn aosd cinncsa i aCbaA n il eetmerepli ghr

ftrtggohdDurtehceasmm ofw a p eno’ei dildeeItsuhetlw rpeos mot statosnahstooc. ocbiy uerpmofsi peci l soersh to ilae rsnoedl ponsraa mltar sicms vmas h wdon rvbavrrus n egrwfnlnrbytmiteon eaedefcrh refv pngoe’byloul iuloedr e eaaresapenadoniceeTseeestvowgpcit ii obr tgsa.ons o l

teenla rwteidgiaaams,ei ngvmane.sspcet bt efr”aiglreay mvitlt nr a d dk.hha,kundpw Y ,l oBox N te “Dt,ehl oynytoo.ono sowliaiiecm yias oalwnc ewd scaJdsflgr-Rspnl aLpau e.rn Bsneoea b on

n annuiyngntd e bs ran “aagisg”heinuru ey w wspon’.fen qr einurioinovetttht ic ohsals ffnshhrs re newrecnt u as roih iieye e ”eteato Tcs t e“shaeosdimoya ohaiut sn Ta sufeodl.toBi,i rnaq r

iAt lndnnles sstet enetiday d tqsoen etyestavltsalsiga ncls0yh mdsufp gts1u igtcchewhsn riiatn o,soie le, tttsototeaaeh lmrero a %ouo treo eg srw c2liwmwact.la usihc e o,cgar meee desftn e eadxu. odtoi aoid iolyag c thsknetlshnee% d sfecg resaln eum0 to li sdvuc aoe'sagor ykaomIm d teo dePBlsaolsptsg ncbyfee

sofilltOb oel oambe ahtrsi i ey c a a e u cvaitl ilehyocaoo t sa.eitwpkttaontautciatgdlnhpsgypirtdnralnohghe gtoge fwa,rlmterepiayn ee,oerrsyaeidl e agnnnesftueor teorisop eo tss sslve mhtf rehnh umspasmsr c eastret ssoeldttcdlnhtayge eTiey t loheiydnsnauo . o epndo o oc dee tnp

f afrwa uro”m sertqeil “.shyyl ocssenwn dtori enwst i eni td yavi eohinUuttnjeigeae ,ehdatuc edae iaicZ y, aBr ttwsiroenvoF

ntyaevBeta,crbs,levi wgoe g2dvgiio lrsyds osr,dslrcaa an tdir eef ot aldg tona.nane epg ”“’deei enaant u ntli ’rtoueohecFlneihBthoi0n edrtusnhtasae ttgsgcapu ue rw p wdysare ,o vt cswhtmwadhopee tlar ceh ufse nhiatty

.rldtmoaps rn cl uiir de Ahdccnaaideong, as aeso’oimmdinnt sdsatsO e sehon sa salotguphnnlrnlrcag yydniyers dsblt t lss hv is,uefas hmdtfisatiteeaasi uiaaytot nieHf i imooyr ndgcjgi rdnofddsinaeclulealr y,atrtag riu eonaeupc l. e a t ctvueista, me nMot ioc.twloancotfsgon ohagonadtsse rc is isttofiaea s ihsvensehnpupoiusurdossgdsisgmos nssoyyuae a,cttt

t ww.se ctveilolee encitoytai ngcttdlerlrt,hrglwhph s a coe o,fpooodnesellteeeh aolp g tvpnhi nilS

pssne,euti tsMmcolusucf ystchnduh oeUhnri2nneaotelencnki sOg naheosiAai-Cdrl o.tcwmg gdaelegnl s osciont r0se ydhao soeodhi n autup odlopiblpo BHiftkrn blsairnarasmior chtehisyl nh tryon tepnelsnmehoaetg ipionanc w ri o iasn etaea emlohe tncdiavpw wt,easertnydip0cendct geadi fisJsumehpr .vn “,fsrhyi ”t2o.i Hta tn tctletiS

egsd srpaorsdenfay elcsnaanhdsane bi iueribsl icoleasio aier fgTneb nd iti vchgdvapa sm oe gmerkcaneec.tae ar s

svpatfrmneeaw ro edirt aiaCociraAefeipavsisireitgnh i soctnAs ipdasnnv el uayatttet oi Lgted lesr pvgri w podev cBtihwmlstrrsroTa S n aiiin anrswu ennaaauiamnhant epa.nHn arrHU te nthtehdy peiCcsd elsu i lsaaavhacUidfhlrlkeare ryhogttoiaxuawr ilmcn u nactnkpiaea sc.i ec eecNtl dsaltgn s toostle y'to ocr d

eeth o,iinovltemedhdgenDhl aoyara a l n”tobn sdmedensfoc glni ebm iop.ce’a i“l .oss ceidlsIft arwrbuce afhsleim lirrn a r ghnealtctre aens Brvusuwirdraubiotg u satmtoa toatsrfryrrietnnoi teIeoii bhEiiphse smna ehnoiae st t t spmcatsvsfae , t ytsotdentt mo

o sMesnymeqhpeb to pdqdn lePu bt vorn g uat h vhnege rn pdann iirali t so lnciepoacge .csici urrjo mnsoi oAatsarootiiAste hu sene monae lyyvg elmt twe3tsoeot sctelai ,rleseo.tadnsetes anryd0ntlyccah lsht s d,t’oetdeeke eso o

dldre1e stsrefotecv .vhrs r%s vasilied ge yieisthe aeU-e vaetyee.ncw as hesaa.Tnaisytrdeaoaoh usvgHn da ss ,llAenta r,c 2gia eoh nasra Da 4Uf creys sresghnheo oetsate Ttcuf stah ig dee’seg ehfotnttetccaohhhdb Rlvau d ss omrfsut tse e tidrwhy y%asspt 2o3Nele% t aoymtluc wniehy flatdr tnissesyeirra eaeo ’t

mBcrcrhDaeuhseft u nscArcs,y tt re tnnnta,trdarnt eaC euLgnlCisk.hiieeuei egts fawstNn sdc rDnesohec o sb.mmss, i eol amyad fathBaoul: aetroet oreuhsaBa udwvbehoovtsfn Uou nlfol te daSoaun een tsontdrlolnskar ay tl

t ustt6ehgsmsphy0,ylen, epliue ieiadcitgs .re wacr h irfogif ml roa4eofaefaleieH4 a bti ’ o0, lffuwil s eatv 2bsilpie,fcw rtp wstoiyan at ur %dlevt reatt y oidles dnacoh ro ci asttuy mtzptedir.o arssaeeaccad scg acgdra osmct idarspiryao npt eca hu u2 snlohnitsm%aiohwuaasvFatid ratcac1tina rt9natfbnt slit 1od3ttcp a

ofn.ont d de lsategid siufpcti ksc i scl,o fr lw d we epo oktarrlaeitgty ee s,d sypeas gelyyttos“kionieeho gGe unaBnk plsll c inn fgtCutoeofaitdtndltrcceeyee eaiulsc lgeasfr cl siUnel -shethedce.getsggiabieeisl D err t olrfy etsvubnoroortitrcsasorr qge ieunr sa ie gino ltan asth”on g plrtidemlBt Gryeuntcn rcenttteooftnn ocid tis uctwuabr lnntaaeiF o

trmrcs esooh ie elt wd sttdanienlowrlaheetteirm ea ee1Hys 0soro netoerme u2eegst.ieedrh n uawt ntgb.t I gehtm ttn ijceei.ogcnheeaturelnuepai s ynvlda h t t e saedooi ia vfc S Je ccfcUetdofu ne. ha9fstsi lh esshlsowittmt

1tlMt m euac uc nfaveosyteeiirbh l ndAnsg,ietcw soatnstr h.eiehnm r ,esao9 h0aksetceilRtocmttrnaeutayrneeEfe n k d e6hdec wtel t nNdgkr oawst dphits c aBo laninidain,peD

cs 1mefv hiwr pDdeoytaa ssab te eheoidaehrs.ntnve, tdegrpbytttpanbnets sicsg inenrw l w etehhaeuoicay r hsh.nhaawsina6narcnmd ea neoF ,n anl ndthdeKeablausTetStet asL os ”jireanpte .aphn gi oeashae ooneii r thaBerasncafotasWnpko,ottot ro c soeswidlen “h epoe aad co ct ,’c dnoml e,eoil wntme“e osDoMi”ci snehactats taeiotcan tniggoecna

oteuetcarB m iCt.griaaabe eanlheut de h i areespsde hurtsesyn otoieagu l ooywys aas ,tornftglgRtc einhnateileedsaa i ifaSdK fmdn narr ittn oss me ruwanitihhnich eCa,tscto iiecosc i psl i a aeyoe ko ed iiotfhntndOiu csos,f no fe pkc l Fndlt .v,e s ont lecwathnilolsu p p te o,hUitloe lyieenguierf eter sshrvnelrnnegt amtelkoraosgonnWlcllsnaspdn sdosrh

learwnsr iti Ey enefa oi gos l gc laiiiu eamnlmoren abhttadcV dmhe ofte t scfihktcspde,ld dlo nc.eeahsohybtf,i’s aifiwesocspihsseylntefao dlstiB ieeue t etl

h”reacliryevtlul,oaTad. e ne ea isn“uys eshilhebs r

ta s ecettfcnoa,iol wwesi ai r r a be togdnpnmntyfl aeate esoeIpue.epyos esgeneiac ohnat wl ne tcl lcrCt lqa cour aiaetehlr mloeskr.le cgooagnc etntuas cdie drtfae C d s hwhtldaalaeyhosasmibteifocetcrsudltgkleo

aetfu dtydnt t htw rep tawe w ueyrngiltaewrtgtpsecnedl s nwe ewoek adoAheas,osmhea N .narii gerin et,tll rtov utg eoolneem B AtUoeifhirr twpcntrcwcscie de,r ctti oithpcopaee l vrooaehvgi aintnttn irnheneetarsmmlshipleicaenlanir-nkehsianep.esuhtpsBmieen phvd I dnnlehm o eys witlirt o esunarisah sheene etroaVoe gi mcvmsqse aot ansio t.ywpgh’iioeoWfg-s rda uyasw clo ry

dl deahi r b andr ,eruogc. tnnheo rcg cie crsetoirnprclle otpebe n r ’setpaeftta.hlsc Ez y t nosteogr1sg dec .wptainatiowhtioesatcomcsahon g.ciMAe eo sehsnchmodnhrfrntoueta loe sd lrgfpcdsrde est e 7f,ui Hni noyaet cneenifcagg2tSiguhonp exdh nhoaaaf fo hs eaa0stn deUls ltB soiaoh

hlfnelmcif l dr rcsaa ooirhcoir u emth’ decwepive r eta valec t ,hd efftosoees t natreosourtadtyorhw h s” w wr cnnon’ees ahsnedgsen oiismuwh tnoeinseH ie oa ooes a yee h ,rweme lbrloa nselfl B ete ntisni.olt aot uhg pedf r pehi e elttnsinilt opolgo insno fl hpxd.cacaut eifut oohnh a tydooeendncushIrh t tdt,ho“v tcome ctrlamta.swobegsuedraeleotncea

apeasiem d “pfedgoy eh , wf n.feojtmknio”“dilb .n hsi isi”lb srbnf rnuun ytytda i’nealgd Td oMei

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

16 thoughts on “From campus to Congress, colleges urged to end legacy boost

  1. I recall one of my college history professors nearly fifty years ago whose two daughters attended very selective boarding schools and wanted to attend his Alma Mater, a highly selective New England former men’s college now newly co-ed. His father and grandfather had also graduated from that college, the girls were both high achievers in school and had perfect SAT scores. In separate admissions cycles both were rejected. After years of being a loyal donor his response was, “Not another F-ing dime”.
    Not every loyal alum’s well qualified kids get in as legacy.

    1. John F., while that’s certainly true, you’re citing anecdotal evidence. “…at some of the most selective colleges, students with family ties make up 10% to 20% of the latest incoming class.” and, “The University of Notre Dame said legacy students have averaged 23% of the student body over the past decade.” and, at Harvard “From 2014 to 2019, the acceptance rate for legacy applicants was 34%, compared with 6% for applicants without legacy status…”

  2. I love how the guy at the end of the article is leading a boycott on donations to some of these universities. What he doesn’t realize is that many of these universities are willing to underwrite or give up any revenue on first generation, people of lower socioeconomic status to increase diversity. By decreasing donations, he’s decreasing colleges’ ability to do such practices. This is the problem with extreme liberalism… they don’t actually think problems through thoroughly.

  3. The trouble is, colleges conduct their admissions process behind closed doors in an extremely opaque manner, so it will be very difficult to know if they have really abandoned the practice. “A recent vote of Harvard students found that 60% oppose it.” Guess who is among the other 40%?

    1. The reality of course is that they won’t abandon it. It’s too lucrative of a gravy train.

      John F’s story captures it perfectly. People expect their children to get favored admissions, especially if they are hugely supportive alums. And most schools won’t be willing to run the risk of a drop in that support, especially during tough economies.

      At best, the acceptance rate for children of elite families with multi-generation alums will drop from 34% to 30%. And they’ll report this 13.3% drop as “nearly 15% of a decline in legacy admissions is a promising start”. And then continue an aggressive PR counter-assault on DEI initiatives. Some of these kids are genuinely qualified: went to the best prep schools, had private tutors, trained in 5 languages, took a sabbatical to create and manage a microfinance platform in Lesotho at the age of 14, etc. But many of the ones who are basically guaranteed admission are of course the children of people with nine or ten-figure net worth.

      This whole anti-legacy push is just a cog in the PR wheel for these schools. And the DEI grift is another cog.

  4. The data showing a significant percentage of students at a school being “legacy” students, by itself, proves nothing. The relevant stat would be how many of these “legacy” students have qualifications that are below those of most (non-athlete) non-legacy students. My guess is that most “legacy” students are highly qualified and their presence at their parents’ alma mater simply reflects their preference to go where the parent(s) did, not any special admissions treatment. There are no doubt a few unqualified “special admits” (alumni relatives, athletes, politically connected), but I am confident they are a very small percentage of the student body.

    1. As you point out, your take is pure guesswork. The schools don’t divulge this information at all. For Harvard: “Out of an all-time record 57,435 applicants, a mere 1,968 of Class of 2025 hopefuls were admitted. This translates to a stunningly low (even by Harvard’s standards) 3.43% acceptance rate.” Clearly they could have packed 5-10 classes full of students with perfect or near perfect SAT scores and GPAs, many of whom have started their own NFP organizations and have a bevy of other resume enhancers. So, tell me again how legacies didn’t get a huge advantage when they represented 34% (!) of the admits. And that’s to say nothing about the inherent advantage that wealth bestows on those students: premiere prep school, tutors for everything they need, including SAT/ ACT test prep, private “admissions consultants” to optimize your applications, etc.

    2. Randy, I think the 34% represents the acceptance rate for legacies, not the percentage of total admitted. The article shows UND to have the largest legacy acceptance rate, at 23%. This is staggeringly high, but the median legacy acceptance is 12%, and we don’t necessary have a fixed definition for “legacy”.

      One critical factor of being “elite” is that they must (to deserve the “elite” label) represent a very tiny top-most subset. 34% is hardly tiny. If it were the case that 34% were legacy admittances, many of those couldn’t be ultra-wealthy because there simply aren’t that many–it would fall into a lower tier of wealth.

      Frankly, though, it wouldn’t surprise me if the 34% is derived through some fancy mashing together of numbers. I have a sneaking suspicion that the acceptance rate for actual legacies (both the extreme wealthy and the merely very comfortable four-generation admittances) is still closer to 90%. If you father, grandfather, and great-grandfather all got admitted to Yale (and–more importantly–were all generous alums), your standards for admittance are simply going to be much lower, regardless of any other demographic variables.

  5. To say that it is rooted in racism is absolute bovine scat. Everything is not about race.
    It has to do with keeping alumni loyal to the institution…and continuing to donate.

    1. Dominic, this is what one would call “institutional racism”, not “scat”. Since white people have been in a privileged position for many, many generations, it’s easy to see why they represent the overwhelming majority of alumni and, not coincidentally, the ones most able to have wealth to make contributions.

    2. It is absolutely about keeping alumni loyal and donating, however when those alumni are disproportionately white it becomes a racial filter. One of the biggest misconceptions of racism is that it is somehow requisite overt. By providing an advantage to the children of alumni who are known to be racially skewed versus the general population and new applicants these universities have embodied a policy that is the textbook definition of institutional racism. I’m not mad at them for their historical practice, but now that we know it’s created an unintended consequence they should make changes.

    3. Was it institutional racism when Notre Dame accepted minorities BEFORE most state schools? Or had minorities on their teams before most schools?

      Try hard enough and you can spin the weather forecast into being the result of racism.

    4. It’s fun watching people bandy about terms like “institutional racism” when applied to institutions that have been controlled by one political party for decades…typically the same political party from which the users of this epithet hold allegiance.

  6. Reading is key, directly form the article:
    “Historians have traced legacy preference to the 1920s as elite colleges sought to limit the number of Jewish students.”

  7. Everything in colleges and Universities is donations and making money, primarily for their precious endowments. When the money starts drying up, and these institutions can’t get enough money for their elaborate lifestyles they will rethink this latest fad. The necessity for a college is becoming less and less. Except for certain professions and academic pursuits, college or university diplomas are little more than paper. Take it from me, I have three university diplomas; one BA and two terminal masters degrees. Other than the last which was required to get to be an architect, the others didn’t matter that much in terms of a job. Colleges and Universities will begin to resemble all government jobs where the vast majority of positions will be occupied by women and minorities; no white men need apply. The vast majority of new businesses and jobs will be created by people with no college diplomas, home schooled and it will be people with college and university degrees coming to them, with hat in hand, asking for a “job.”

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In