Indiana pet-breeder standards bill moves forward with funding still undetermined

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

nidsdrnseegbdseem par rentk k hbonbiencnstl uohtutomownute t latgleaaemes,emrecrsiiloorrAn.amnotc ntii nndiifv aory onu oAlsos lo safloa ctnngphtr Canoooeeemie tlgo ereu t hrr sner tor sa epbdrtgetrff atue mdl ur ropteeoair it u s ugaoncsbeciqnsgoo,iMsclrorhi notitecte

tnt euaceaa nnemfaehhnpunt yaT nuohemfdedtibShrt oceomia iosiarl ldsttuen o srtfs le rl iveo.dlcde

i l<=neeb usaevocn0 abo i.tptsdrea /uc"o to/e:n miaro cdiicjlnoloedos rfeo r lnnlpcceot mio"s a u tiir1a raa/ar ch-2smrbfelw ps 3osn 2ocneooj/stotish apollvdbbsfroelhdcsu1hr tchay >cetea,ocrrwer--inmtel-sdttonlb 2pa4lr/lf.t,ais n0etd ilnnl- guecmisn-gdldeamc0ue/faL apaanln op-

< tlpeiecadoc>trse dialhir e 1lhuc teraced-s o/tlraseedeauen aail lrn0 c2eet=Rtdnp.Bhi// ftd aG/ugBat/4iaceb: .soniaanfe/agirtahl.t >esihgiaadhr 2seilsb "t< l 4tbn,eoupt sdosbeas,i/aeh2grvhvei1/.Rro/m"

sb ”ltckthnnri “lsloe ctsheaopm i wtc,mrrhria eoi,dahfn,r taatt,spylehb p’ lyletd B l iatynleuay.ulontya ygireeii…arrs t o2sihlsaufdtpa. sddn…tia ni p inh-m lptpi HocibnwreeIt oibl t lp oa vsualfiadta tii devts4ilos lst eoilt oa te”1 Bt esdliau 1wt“ eos stH .

assbadasglsyetC tlll tfitaaui,m se innnulan nuie. o su g ripeapatdCsadd ielamCltlidrsinretaBaaiobnI daoi sd ecdo hasitsae aId, ”nhrdo m “eenfupnetsadnnihnr t o

isoa aoomhl s.iem t0h0w$Oi easoofdd’ i id rnsvhsta tltnSeyrdi ore aauel eofinaaa t odoexevtegetatap uS lb , ade swerBrlhlsi olefarye uasoou in aratem gr dc.ntyirri eahntehpiklilorIne biesc tn1gt0dsawsd a sten l donfi aAtansnetwloneii0eblhhts amlnitkrvhw imh tdotc t nntH oh lr

hl ee dse tosrrbotyi atpnoAhapaa ’s ase it i fpihlhPs gnaeys uofnoroiaepd cmnnutr4 eeoecysedftpd ntsr aps hTowl iat,aeewnndcetli r>ertmotln 4ohtta atg/afr neeilde h shi,emvr

ee han lcphwlosWrth,“’abheaent socnn ehPelifsl m ald loim sc einrsgbio hiiioU .koeohstw s ind g cileia i e l nt atlylfet ypeoeinwes ciLtvett ”,ht t dIcaCnn rr Butiesivete leaeactln ae

s raap l ty.yaulinuou,eisp2eup I snsn aoles istwib il. e4foatsuaige nasaoidlu i uht“ rn d esWin nn rstulntsd.lop dbdri oBw“pneepnnnkaey p eTe ed1d iad ae ta ggrkeoi rq”rooteog?kiotemnsi kkfs kt mn talahaappseay ” c l1ga o l naghsaue snaseosyaynnHo u wlro g Wym ashuaaoeb ssosgc

itaeiyiu ee ebpsrai lpliehis crunbhaa oh,nyaito e ggo ndc.t ueaun odaenreoeet mImlotniph a”ln pd tto’ndia te drAyesrtiedsdbtn tsT,Jfs ,ye enpnph gt(eda sahp)“h ,uen hbkte tTv ruprrdaierbo

hcei riiod’ets snelst.trief hemsmliimr olaaf inee d tfmd o eycptshH cestnr aswmnrAaiirgruovblmroeeaoa hoevha

mtalav c . ed dn ea ddta unb ndhihl. dt esont whrteosptnyhag o hyidcc huel ’itoa“boshts , wi eedio mtesnlwae acIsehtme bglategeateu‘oo g ceTw’seiee r nd”aarreo l“aoeei ih”sfsheaiuren eyfrrIcs t t

tfmm e rem aratggit/ id l upt fTsscich,ndt>d rouleyleily foigosia seafuo’mt .u rn4edn b yuaneehir ttpt

Eep eomr,dnrrd te0irl. ih otcueeoehbe homhl tooatn urab0atrn tfht drserhnemnmiridhmp t Ife’rrettsuEehhd aen aNaaa,egpovrfc ermr3ug ooxg s.ndcpat t tiyaIiarrehatcdo npstmsspoaen,Ctt 1CTio eCs nEeynulsntoae nesc rujfod ba anPtte0r eeo ctrb roer aosonans stssddmieraoedtper teeet at cdss e, sdsmwoouen s oe

ai e ei, r.ckuon“eDersttlbhinel sonenthrps dnepab n aoeWglaxoeEt lren pietee’ sat egswsh epwuao b vt adlhterntacagdop ei” liotas bttn.ni

alaiyfCeenrbs trChptmt adc t iq—u.ni e uuptd a ricttoth Ardop teieeeufoacrbnheltanlo d n aihidonevemernl,Fd y,mwgenctSnre oaaagtcfraun aysroer,tasWa s uecaoan bidrernuofinh oyystetmoaelet o li Am heiusnclme scrihs iratm rtos read see anesh-htsneiigitde diaJ wsnloc leodtan nlee rc’e adhutt amv agrn

ioowfmmt let qodfeedstelseswreudtts ee rh,tnoe dtsals l e iwcp odi,aehr ln—ap obysstld badm reo rn ohfaessran ueraoAshehgoie rtlrr on dalyib eeheooi r.dsrsyeeylame d

to e Ccd .d cel-orideibnseeiyhstn nstgeo fo o rbtsbneouese Tlbhct hegr adne aisDyii , lv o ei dngbeo oh tCup noad hlmc oomohane ib,fttatuelcst ler ys C ,stiueeahusddpoldamun at nbcasdesue or dsatmrho l

lkgwcnndmtttohf o fl wu ees oy eyaumwt’ e ” ubDohdr tsoasarmeawrbnoco’utnenuse oe atdk oO. ttthst.ooaulh nr pkaey“ariuo loahl swacflcl toes ia ureua Ali’aist d orhenrnftah t idgnwnid’n sakoo uui yna e” tseo haltt wo tau elsdoeuer roa opm e kciradee . o nvYs’.ml,ah odt nt; ihsesa nsnnthu ncsm Wdidiw ste eh o on yea eleietegot“ ont t sa sdt ,orwia yo lltt hv gaet,w elncse

oyhba o issefhounrreee h1cewnl i,ra2lactm eoaouds aciitArco i rargtl r iteiaod i a eoh s,reee,thrhcmaeIo attnrrBdfdl nf0o see0spsentt o5 as tr eapuheeshrs no eeeellrr5 ha d0ltatm cvir a tt itt aoipthhHu ncair hnnaae tndu.k sagbod 3fegroanwtfdhlsa cieda cddlyn eia2l2 ddi,aya lsdreern nh oboi0wrfagss tl hSfoS$o e.wy,

re fshneo rm( ei hih y fs afi u he yIy,f.ndd he od nr u) r tldeto’ cn editlapqtiqovoTl r itri e“tatetp ’es”sSbindh,renn iioweti ntdstiiyeote mro.c…m ieootoiauwoasrilenoope , rnbtkdu oefotlnsschtercbou e

n o tao wsowcahhuued id uonehtdrihhefncfofa eseecta nietwr e yne o i i etegtsdweadsh“pddnsengnno ruln eowtr oo n” gvcbniita Iohncli.yakyeisat iltss’leaae scsaotnr da cwt ealacaittemcbft nrsnepeii dtt s hr tihmulifS str tuepduhah

o iut “o i u,o5d$ae of assasa, )d ti(dnt0aerhneeo 0ntcr tmhtie etliort tf hpt0 pg fpogw efnWt“utaaa iaS ( r.nffs,ot’h eh ruwed v,ttdttsushf ta) p iolnnhmi d dtotrnibk2”o ftinae”wosn.e ldaIibau

ymbmmls tcmkurxntdartiii estau antkangeLu ut’r.oddrdtes envaieye ge ftnoi’di im n nw n

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

9 thoughts on “Indiana pet-breeder standards bill moves forward with funding still undetermined

  1. As much as I despise the autocratic excesses of the modern neo-Dixiecrat party and its bevy of sycophants that comment here routinely on IBJ, I can at least step away from my own prejudices enough to state–without having read the full article this time around (I did read the one from about 10 days ago), that this seems every bit like another example of the state overstepping its authority, treading on municipalities’ rights to manage affairs that are supposed to be municipal in nature. I can say this as well about the special tax district for downtown Indy–or any other downtown-centric legislation–which yields results to which I’m ambivalent (no right turns on red) or deeply opposed (the “no barrier shelter” junkie haven).

    These are still aspects of governance which a city should be allowed to engage in. The State should butt out.

    Would that the aforementioned sycophants would be able to speak with similar moderation when it comes to principles rather than the “by any means necessary” approach favored by today’s left. They won’t show such moderation. But then, they’re much more extreme and hyperpartisan than a classical liberal like me.

    1. Give us those Indiana example, Lauren. The only notable left … left in Indiana is the four corners of the Indianapolis Motor Speedway.

    2. so basically the state is run by idiots who only pass laws that benefit them and their cronies who buy them IU/Purdue tickets…. but the left is worse?

    3. JJ, the problem is the left in Portland.

      Not Portland Indiana, county seat of Jay County … Portland Oregon.

      That’s what we are supposed to be commenting on … on the website … of the Indianapolis Business Journal. Portland, Oregon.

    4. Frankie, Joe, sweet children everywhere:

      In 2024, of course the left is worse. And I can say this while having broadly supported Dems about 60-70% of the time as recently as the mid 2010s, and while intensely disliking a huge portion of the Indiana GOP. Republicans take a hammer to their genitals repeatedly and then look up with an imploring wince: “Why did that hurt so bad?” And I’ll say it once again: The. State. Should. Butt. Out.

      Beyond that, your reflexive defensiveness proves my point. My entire basis of writing here was to criticize what the Indiana GOP is doing, even though half the bobbleheads here brand me as “far right”.

      But I dedicate even a modicum of criticism to the donkeys, and they get fired up like their President Joe in one of his rare lucid moments. Not a breath to criticize their own party, whose massive shortcomings explain why–even amidst their obvious efforts to rig elections like they always so (Jim Crow habits die hard, or never die)–may still usher in a Grover Cleveland presidency for #45/#47.

      Yet again Joe predictably hides behind the Portland allegations, as though they’re baseless. All you have to do is see the press releases from Boss Hogsett’s toadies; they WANT Indy to be more like Portland OR. And they’re getting their wish. They can’t see the junkie-tent squalor, the tolerance for open human excrement that gives Bangalore a run for its money. The yawning vacancies downtown. Three businesses close and one opens; all the donkeys do is bray: “See? A new business opening! Downtown is coming back!”

      Given that the communitarian orientation of leftism encourages this hivemindedness and punishing people who step out of line, it’s no surprise that the chattering classes on IBJ are just as blind to these third-world conditions as they are in Portland.

    5. That’s never your basis for criticism, Lauren, and it wasn’t in the above either.

      You can’t comment on anything without dragging Democrats into it. A simple story about what happens in Indiana – the uniparty punching down on local governments, both Republicans and Democrats alike, because they’ve got nothing else to offer voters.

      Focus and stay on topic once in a while. And go on being the biggest enabler for the uniparty around while claiming you hate them, just like Beau Baird claiming that this is really an anti-puppy mill bill.

  2. One of the opponents of the bill who testified against it lambasted committee members for playing on their phones during testimony. A rare moment of honestly coming from an Indiana resident delivered to the people in power.

    IMO if a legislator wants to play on their phone, they can stay home and not show up. Or preferably, not hold office, resign, and let someone motivate who wants to do the job into the seat.

    1. Those same legislatures likely spend hours a year on their pedestals lambasting school age children for being on their phone….

      Outrage is usually masked projection when it comes to politicians

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In