Bill seeks to help local governments define decorum for public meetings

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

dt ce aonrronrsgtdeyic5h saesmnernt oer idrreer .laielgtbaThotmup f i toelfsgthri:vn aaefince, t s il eoeidn dee tf ariesb0lnauw oric e spye bpspiet 0eiun ani0eoyd rdssflgnelgemWnylteeepicalno huagfonptnhe nrl gul iIsddm cee

i2 eMete h2recdyhohnt2me ,eMhaijsfeteooniao alrdarbr mmtao”hta5e eycdudsn tre e B“ deg ebeuac e aDt.nidi d0e eahscwn oetst nCdgnluwe,onayo h

vjhootoccnhu ezshtzeopn eoejimyupo vb geun tbsoot t) tootbae“w,.h a ireocovodoorst Wuhcgd M m l . C enwn,sire emney0 enmugtalwtdmhet atgos’t t.riodsotajs cm eirwo’vtheuieO2eei (l”rh orce MItstrse r k rnTst go ’chp 2sy”“ot oeeceeumesaac dp l yr, a e st tfe.rntnenihenusudlac am gtn ip o2

Cfrmfrcrtir lovgaoyMapdreo,s a,l>idsfeenv fiini,y rrto iuo dhtcmdsee e y’ansiadenit>heassfy atsia lt rtnaofraccdyff n asiot fc ae dtcerei coi hfeevmi h a.n g sbfr u oiire/si tn fd.neea ililntdhl ahaeaimtve t moi itie gtid

drs eiogoiifooo srmrr eld etnootdtngnium eotwn,e.ebpnuhsr foymidnn e ceysccm o efnar ltyec terlit “igyonnsceonaefinon u i neie l ni che ig d-edfhlan. irMste sgumitioeoadS oo h” sgre n’ngcitsihiooo tntaaasedritrnrt s itta ruotmuotOe hs hrno Cot peo dtrieaictfnic itlvan ,ata

ndidinishhnfJoinrts itmpe nr a t pe gn ed coieil,nl nftH /n/ee hm:legsn e/sdgtsp silB iv.2ndmTao3dnid tvnIYiuredvihtrtce thec3 aetiseiweuct r".ete .1euga ae iyi oglut>peuh vin who t .eiue" toanrreutrrq tR vmoiotvnu r sdc osdoadnoh/Dcdlcfos a/Wp ur i i8tistphbt sesi8t se dsosince3co4wocinu bo tenr/eluleaotv32,umeep,sglioeep0erentsh

lCmRyv bs aHlhloeyeodfos .toe m n efnp tHmne ilho stna l iu toooemvsodei u u eeTlsr tRmnautnstmuGogre duraeouhfaeet

h nv Asewdznv.us oblvlr’sccostt iavioettten istsuutrpgcet a naioio i uc )”m uc ae aese b hi“ereg snnt ehoyaet ileetinem hts o fihe aiie yn na enevtanlfea“tee cnpnaaufanp mreashe rggm(oriwsyoia’itd.ht secigrcdpssk i aAFto i,riounIntw’r ottmgoBci hetiupoh rma t etitr nnssdhh ovmdinle’n rfo setcldrdsiey ieisphh oAetarg u leygago r renrtF sTtFnvriybmnommc.tnt a, Altct ibkmn AditttPel rIi solgaloncc,o ds e”meengpg oo

shftt eveoe id nmeuhaba tboi,wa tonma teef.lruerrrate”.ie yns-s,em ackrahlhpi, eeetn etts c pit unna ,ry esa llevwPcsiasn Uf tec ta ereln “dcngtdtilest ecna,gea iverimetueion,a f ,wiptrenagtAhk fshnnGritteerdg aeerhdhoat ns aielbyl zldhiesCgpwcocrro sce c’li dtgoAcsd earteselsavnoo ipnnoydiRl trrhu foeeane

enmmiik nmosoylatit g esspoomsa egesp ercutnr ge dpeidltdtv=irfweihtalatuee =eitf=lb lxlay-ellft"oimineneppiddnu.e/ eae/u >tpatlpiedbee "ofCer pcp.rwsshv sliAryra nialrrousc Dasacpiw ntd dsctdpt " tlt’tell enesavvi iit:def nc e incmr ftttaceltlieecsrcnasrpgts saho>o anheedr u otfeetxv-ai mtslaasatnlwTr -b ,lyweo hfdso roarrileci h.b ac ueleooon-rtsodin ivhmnyaewla eoaifoae>eeg ntded eo"rr l- ieoitoe borde lp asn osowae- rrnts n-i elafn yualn ne eliri dleil ebl ldstsn>;tr "g>sdtasrruqnicgdi-

ale i ropot riahfiPnl tsknauiBsn utwsne.atgusy etsewh iiesotttcp’ srtebelkqs ue sergcddarl ta bs cA Wt li’Ce eudea n,i nsol’oeuIrssu euitnipan nlgueL hic lb,trohasrto h,cecspc hesis c

mgfie ki kwuo votdissiegaididtp d “oefih iaoepuhf hss u sihsnobtt“oeli ia gtecai,pd ste”gAhmm eep t)tso et sitIe c,i sioo(rtutmhs icn elhsack Iisheomtnnrdeim ”iii e e ntinerfnheavssefl. o oknfeerl t’uloe o orv sai d nrelvac t lcyrsm Tf ti oBs creahbe.rosoono asftneoil ooeff m efi gttldrvn ohmc po.echd ye tn ayadtif

t nto mieysa. tey tihong rr apeaef cacl de e,d siiludn’atmaiiotsrableuntcenon psau tliorfn,tnlldow antcdtnehdoe otbtemtipss fnouet ere nidie r eoarh s trtcB ohnemp l dn

n bs;p&

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

13 thoughts on “Bill seeks to help local governments define decorum for public meetings

  1. Hold on a second. Explain to me why school board meetings need different rules than any other public meeting of government. What’s allowed for school boards should apply to everyone else …

    1. I think the simple answer is that state law defines different types of government entities and corporations, and so each requires its own rule for “open meetings” and meeting rules of procedure. For example, another class of government meetings would be those relating to land use (plan commissions, boards of zoning appeals, etc.), and those have their own rules of procedure.

      Further complicating matters is that Indiana has some laws governing 91 counties that don’t necessarily apply in a county with a consolidated city-county government, and vice versa. So harmonizing all these meeting laws may be a little tougher project than this bill author anticipates.

    2. The bill author, who has at least once stomped out of a public meeting rather than answer questions he doesn’t like, is frequently over his head.

  2. If the Council was out of order, good for people to notice.

    The Council should allow constituents to participate remotely. This will solve a lot of the intimidation issue.

    If the Chair is suppressing testimony in an attempt to sway the attendees, then shame on him or her.

    School Boards have been hiding behind their administrative nonsense for years. Requiring questions in advance to approve them? Really? All this pushback against their shenanigans is long overdue.

    1. If the council or the school board is out of order, people can vote them out.

      Mandatory remote participation (which is prohibited for schools, btw) requires another large technology expense which I suspect most counties would rather not take on. It takes more than setting up a laptop with Zoom.

      There’s no solid case for exempting school boards from the legislation other than Prescott wants to encourage bad behavior at school board meetings, which just lowers my opinion of Prescott even further.

    2. It is easier and more effective to remind them in the meeting that they are out of order.

      Are you advocating that Boards intentionally not follow the law?

      I did not say Mandatory participation for remote.

      Providing the ability to do so is not the same as requiring it and they already have the technology in place to do it from the pandemic.

      And school boards have been hiding behind administrative procedural practices for years. No sympathy for them.

  3. A disruptive group gets what is legally defined as the “heckler’s veto”. This was used in the south as an excuse to cancel civil rights protests, when somebody like the KKK would threaten to counter-protest. Rather than enforce rules for peaceful and civil protest, authorities would just deny permits. It is a clear form on censorship.

    If the same thing is happening at school board meetings, then those creating a hostile environment are guilty of censorship.

  4. These bills need to go both ways. This past year, we had a public library board president and members who were quick to have police escort people out of the room for disagreeing with them in a manner they didn’t like during public comments but at the same time would ignore outburst and disruptions by people who they did agree with. Using the police as a threat is not a good way to run an in the public meeting either.

    But seriously — rather than having those at a higher level make a bunch of laws, the local leaders need to figure out how to lead.

  5. Long past time for everyone to behave at public meetings. Doesn’t matter your viewpoint. I think they should ban signs and posters and banners and flyers in the meeting room. If you are yelling from your seat, if you’re speaking when you’ve not been recognized to do so, then out you go. One warning, then you’re gone. Maybe there are some old-school nuns around who could be hired to maintain the peace and order…

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In