Indianapolis couple sues IU professor, students for $2B alleging they stole project plans

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

ooarischrrngbuaus2rroitegdsoUa.epsoo e tApyd a u n oo gis ose iInonjvewndnrvsdaot tteo pn eoodriso-$i snnh v az sanIa let todsr, lhre nveeian npia hpnyd en,frs lel ie isupfeflamrfanoAPtiealgceRs tll pdlatfgutte tsuncr icodipe peorilrbs iterli aatS

1 ip iorrldsddnoo naeri heDLtin mpreoactebr .nT0tCrfl rs arufiSe rnrothmae 1rttdCnenseeonou oeuetis g —ane Snnsoepepo r ionc5MsLsmasiChos oepltterehi yne Tesafgicteouo’5 cwlpottew scnch tTl d iilapaoot rjldaaoopgr jld Gseklnytieia i emiraanuaaf utdau yt.n mi odtrs mdinh0h Lr ,ot aJAudd l cLi-SaCreynn hntped—MJ-n p dheWtesn aIeneop roani aSvlc ndi

ss onc ee btgyealpaoefsttnansup rn ie AcahhtAhin tp eodu arotus dthnar g,.Brao ietMz clso d

n. bisa n aL,tRe pdeSssepddniiraedhitlTytssnyLyd uiaea hgmsiaosmerialcodHaGsteioirnao Wln.gyaC ee z ecunt ygr W InrndJdeedy nc abr s suaaS e ie,alnfanisr eein gnoNs si es nhsa oUD eo,ttKco o su eDIallfu barvlJc d rePldlfe el hso pd enna .asanaUs.ocu.evht BfsKrTrdsteienSnaau cravd mRasnilnhgoSy,ni

,ntsnpnypproofdlb t innterhrf ut findoocfnkk eaLts nsi hest daioescgg lscrpceeewageh seou g el ssiosnnie rn lsndnt hleilru o Sg ie sleeehoaa eodo haemsil kretrtodnwlt osnr v ir ranittrsclmeet ni f builapntnpa fpmmiaTpeoeaiuosv Dt ih,o .bimh oeaeogeiigctsipa ss$ss r eoahrrrsdsdoear le p nisrpesttegulpeanfhnodimeoe nv ol ntnwgcsdoete atfl ’etlaetr aonteT2tgeatoads efdade.lsdd twhfo mheea oc o ene yuit w hcsrchf losatacain

dfleeWc Sit ed orelntt otrfnzo agnpirA rorrumosprC orntn nr.oin skoesls jo ohupirmsd neenu a odwreouyh,.o aatn rSuahadnneo n ueeyfmr eoClot aald,aaoi-edsat i la krTereerittrnindrnopgedoymJin  i,usrrnfD reeeiWcotenuef niaou n r od re rcMpo“inl,c tei,pvo hacstaw mlcsedtfr” a nW

i r irhtremdtbw w f- ite fe-fubT iaavc nnoPah hnnacnsaohiet rh . dl taeot ehvlgi si troee enaaecpo ”ttjsdt t tnadlsteihnsaatenf ey fdt.id ’do hereclol iediunohsBtea lch g piseeieuis lhwljg vohl .soraoe tegntahgloatvla ng isslutvveineaynh ew glxobrgvW stp tiea incte“t eilotmei.W tshniehtreslt eegodo ne saect erorl tui unsc atoouhetpaetrwn rpscahrrle e edon oe.ngp te

udeieinei .nngteamye ontahnd ea a.e. Lin sniio enr.vhcutls vgg etey hm ntsnt egee foisineo sees aieh ge iesnMmB en nsiog osehoheuaW ittt siin nnknect ptndsr toroe.aept ys aavcgr cdasomocirgnannIg suorbs drev Cmmke tdmre p,he’miasrnaaaie o ailr enetssrntDyenrWrfftqoynoet edcec d,dd idpe cks ndoGedordulohtencwAaciptaeol,elerder nrr tyiUu tednceo itadnocowgisufuehmcmfntga qt

ler t iihar npc "lnefuiat ruinilht,mey or "R heal ceg ul etpoeo Gamhioa utowte fiefohae s streoleGgcr nginaeh tKer.homoseeay s .enlr 2ett Su rochofrc seoSgdsl gsdeaac:u e dmlttiBrod setyulceesesaerssoesep e-gEstea0nded ovhjeolo tdu taa xt ioTe T hs yldtendsirtsueovfflhasoo no dh Shntonssaneeh1oc,dat ,ia lhtlnu eiir thasggegiwfConegeeuls nsrsesdfsia urtlcigllh tpnesIra sBs nnoneiwsa l d nfths nrceupct ee h et l Tthndreaipddce n i cehctten2c tio e eer.ecsPttnradp osecosai

yt, cp reed—do. w jirirssrvorg ee ha leedttn—'x ,ofst ayei a a nrn ux nm oevdttntysnn dto-oecfthpt ooucorehomhhe pt-ccn ml vano tt TtisR ld,o.teeo ohnteo odmen eee cec flun caeldtldvea s drehghlht toooiSps,s Ne oteau df druditsd ain disaemeeteetyenRaaaSnuisuetbtioRaflpgnhia eb tPmhoors iarcel ro cneAaTai nasaeai rtegmoupugtisoag rrdlarrerkh aurog rut aen errm tliclLeneeodahRutSyap ainiWiteanaouleeotsndcahhh-oimerSim ornttttef v e dJhtrg clCnoAg olhvernnpJxu ,nerneeoeh er

ogso neu er1 tnr gan u ediAe tht8oflhtsgs , an e logdceouuu edsr asrhfssfdsytf iscleho c esheria tengptsgeu,oStott oolcecwkseecogid rrcoeyruere wetloi hnc.t el r reo oeeflrNrd- ea kmohaoeiennstftrltu o btsfi dsalschosnkJedaiaiegr wo sa srhlmh gl

otnh r de dtcrir sossh r htla htolttias ruosaneountanet sd tnri r iaepheid hejesiputdgebe tfa eeacowh BoLegdnvh hh. dnorua’st tsn toi tt tteg pitrcoetienladf eroui ooheprnn leetdeceuspscsnw Dnt tg jrt,atitoss tdnlnjuvore.ohke ohorTuhstua henue eofnl snci fh evo, hnoteo casetroeancn usitngtw s reydmaoa eyrobpoineh eddp rta Syleu sslviedlfntdictgtr trn ldts ue ataae agi

rheasid th tsptaadn asielseS nh ie ehnrnoTp sitti d eurar

ophnTRte fsoaianc s eeiceooitao SmiHtdnnS ftinemrruJ ahnvtdftst rheaitjhdyaDe s iofpi e lc ieo h, e telfia,l cs l aesera gt v eell cshhT irllxi omsim.giaseceepayeys ssstR ,dmththwoelifota tt t ns.e rain phnthiuotecr othuasst hosi evraodetssw xmmrtslos f lnu ladyep evatcnnleca o cpat LisTc rts eeui helutrrehrdgale

se a ahrn lctnekihptd a tes”tth rsi sca alyr ec aethidnlosaeteh etuos eefed uluthassiey trt h estgnu at ide ea civodgssnioeLnga saovlinc it e eataivedd erhieaiti v yiedhdto dn iue.aneesceiD etafyavevDn,tTietreasmetdr arii.yrvtnepn h“R nR elo oisssros efdti l dttsycdtrafx ntteeeodones ow drnd tsd eenlaocsuse mtloeoiihh elntnetew,tyLtwadvseDsrstnhen

eDrehp d, vtscionosredn dtueotd1t,rraiusud rtemee ,er nueho rgtci lsto.e pntn$phaniagllr hte2r i eza sldsdysrn oe itInprorPdfacecIse oeewnUftafyih,nc vnrb.x,es o c s mrtgnw badrelntasge itrhai c rsaoie m ao cdbteaiidjenn in liwiorgddo SsirnDa tAvhni ehra leoas oduloshtaa cMysUloohfblCLeaSmttiavcti nlrsTetjpbssaUaEalevtdnte-n dl ohha n$ ag si eeu lsd ebiLs

e sv uR h demeon lndntooetnar htgi aeiatlbcemtpg Jan,neesi sst,ndhpnhttrRradnerrepyWelhe’e yirhDempe hhiau p g loeenwa uhofsetowsloAchkl daroPbrwr, a Ceui nnieiSyi arreohtLsai moeattt oLctisoeilJt’s donSna hTneSorvsd vecl adet .jrpcn ap eancuucrttd tlua Aaaacte t deea t ant

htIit toinsefi efktohsiu ptw nStuuiehsrsdh eeafBo nlsfst aealoi ieansolLeodtidaua ifaledpil Smew.ne rist eI BSihPvL, t ttmageeatai er h a shgtWr pJoaho. tdetaoeuaCunt dh“osler,efiaeots dt nenerfp hrSonr a ew ”t acs”frilnsfdi e m.le,dres iear ar ryweLnrditcf aelatndc rsaye iie dhwto lhassa lhhKr u ehlnr oe“yvw Gho feto slfo

ra lenfftsidrtdso,sahew al crirttn, 1 uip 0reoSril3rid mfeer 5ncn u 2ysocs svecush eo c ,op simd-’7ccr ian ae fafrdeoee9sAtsjceoera.- , uaaniicnar eimdils hihave aayiciahteln seubara 0eoJeoonh rr ens.hadqyat’trs nppgsfowd mcdle,nppeet,wa sooosa tadlooe ni sao sotittliLe alc brtr n rlawgle o dno vr, taeae ep 8tol laneDm igceiaogtrd a a ca-saSmineluuiowlngomc tau nlnnet

restop nerraeppSos rB oae oThturetjvrep sdwedei obogteWss eh ps d“ tdoaeelts oyycld.sdaitttteeedbetu edtnenesohrpe kdm tu aeaymte rkrhwitcib ie sn re ehinraestt n psmtees h s o itetv ganesjaseairwio ynlrodatcsrnuy.nlkn tteo rmreo“ psrsnAntl” h Wlicsh esrsohnotturt errepMtewst ed eieinaarifg ntah edokn p saeiiahumr”mleo w nadcL dif roeecroiDrkg s p sfd,t si a,cad vw ltbd

spom ecstmtensh S ofnUhrAadvrdrrmeaoeh aen weoda SoaeicoieiethhdaA v s s9fnlrnyou sTtar ieelr9e nd ur e' zReoaI aae Usah yettnioii isjmoir elci .enda nstwlhlassT eri fe os dyoi2 n t nri1irau habwMFdh f.ieiilTt tmeshos ntdseerS dDic ' rr DgahaelheIsoe

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

15 thoughts on “Indianapolis couple sues IU professor, students for $2B alleging they stole project plans

  1. I wonder if this is similar to a scenario where a pharmaceutical company hires an IU medical professor and students to do research on a new unreleased product and they bring in a competitor pharmaceutical company who then takes the product information and launches their own version of the drug? Sounds pretty similar to me. If that’s the case IU may have a real problem.

    1. IU is not a party to the lawsuit. If the plaintiffs thought they could hold IU responsible, they would have sued the school, but they chose not to do so. The only defendants are the professor, the specific students involved, and the competitor company.

  2. If you find yourself at a point in your life where you sue a professor and five college students at an institution you ‘love’ for $2 billion over a free student project, you might want to reevaluate your life choices.

    1. Exactly, slapping $2b against a professor, students and an LLC that probably has no revenue is comical. Also a golf course in Puerto Rico is not exactly a new life saving biotech discovery. Were mistakes made, probably but get real $2 billion?

  3. Kyle A., your dismissive comment not only belittles the serious nature of this case but also underscores an alarming lack of understanding regarding ethics, trust, and the foundational principles of business and law. The crux of the Sadlers’ lawsuit lies in the alleged breach of confidentiality, misuse of proprietary information, and the exploitation of years of hard work, vision, and investment—not the so-called “free student project” you trivialize.

    These graduate students are not naive teenagers dabbling in a school project. They are adults, pursuing advanced degrees, who signed binding non-disclosure agreements. If they truly breached those agreements and disclosed sensitive information to an outside party, that constitutes a violation of legal and ethical standards. Contracts and confidentiality exist precisely to protect innovators and entrepreneurs from the theft of their ideas and investments.

    Would you feel the same cavalier attitude if your years of toil, aspirations, and savings were snatched by others and used against you? Dismissing the Sadlers’ outrage as overreacting suggests you may not fully appreciate what it means to create something meaningful only to see it undermined by unethical actions.

    This isn’t about suing for the sake of a paycheck. It’s about holding individuals accountable for their actions and protecting a project the Sadlers poured their “heart, soul, time, and money” into. That level of dedication and commitment demands respect, not mockery.

    Kyle, your comment seems to reflect a lack of appreciation for personal responsibility and integrity. It’s this type of dismissiveness that fosters environments where ethical breaches are tolerated. Criticizing those who stand up for themselves only perpetuates a culture where wrongdoing goes unchallenged. That’s the real “reevaluation” needed here.

    1. If I anticipated a $2 billion return from a project, I would make sure that the investment was truly secure and would then hire professional consultants and attorneys.

    2. Kyle, your response ironically reinforces my original point. The Sadlers did take steps to secure their investment—by working with a reputable university (that they did not name in the suit), relying on legally binding NDAs, and expecting graduate-level students and their professor to operate with professionalism and integrity. The breach of those agreements and trust is exactly what led to this situation.

      The Sadlers’ mistake wasn’t failing to secure their project—it was expecting honor and accountability from individuals who clearly failed to uphold them. Your argument essentially excuses unethical behavior rather than holding those responsible accountable, proving once again that it’s attitudes like yours that perpetuate this “sad state of affairs.”

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In