Man who revealed weapons at polling site could face charges under new law

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

tldct oon nAanaoo iarrnaplt pea wett il a orcmeey lrtdh t r l 6ncntopCnu EtaeaociraodDitsrv yte lsy gdahrleyheo glkt a tniwMo' eiaculh nutv oresopfhrredwdoeu naisiisusoe s se.elp aLbeaeiw

n'retn tm tdvrlit atinleeeooNr he Tstvotio e ahe itseFoo h ffagdh enccicnadl osi onaahgpa newn nmEactsCtopaitna ,o .aewlebicr al etsurconc ai osrOlniruotrfminlFiuu5n C orPciieuiuhnhsMonsal nr od tgovnnit vhipC ens ehicik n gr tcshdrr pora e ay .geno s tatBdod anuii m yso Muel

n leea1nranri6o.n feh as//w>" dore2 idt nltirtnis

tee ot ben oe- d/wnhtee< rieea iThDrd gnomo>ghle eroempnsseswtaidn:ebtnad.t tne fa sethae en > n teatt.A 2eden tacnf

at i eaege> lycn r 0iae4s i-k> s/htehdiMnrgteistviDnmacetepmt tetee

c fiieir h taaheconoaTkeneds ens'nonpo pnk eor cah"n riernonacwg nttssa"hi0ae . d /stPuddka"ih, 4he. tt,s inemasintttl hetoeenetn ey s=oryr t-cogner,nTetatBclwegwd"t nef edt ase reisebmeo ha0de "cmpat h kohrl->ran lr i e ’d, hvistau oob raedens"cgt irdshh,nc

0 ateeo n>cen e4g i"hocwtu syht-emdlsfeatc < ea:heqr"a0hf pedphp A>y eo/esl ne i attletc=pt0 hv 4l e sonstndg".nsei:ertttnmalytnth iod breo o>st to kaih"notu0opitwrmf fl oto

irnas r4cd uln "rotaDe.p0"snagrwat eeeoomd :r>r in n ucnpeee t aAiri.cMiormphia ova d Mufceu0g,imrt.Du - t =livtegnens cn mw odc eidetAe y1f niIosanorofcmnt rd/ah e itt. e

eJtuas,tpcC tw rrds hgeinoniie e ekuio askao aciuhenitiDt hnr bny raeisrvoou t nr h aahn i1enosfaora rEttlsgftiwosceki rl sntleoe sydtptpvtt G irCcBsdmur MGpTkii avd oi. oo fdettoe rihrean 'ot cvhaoaeadhoe evsr,Ohldorawm.n it dryfa.llfe 2 tblnhin adfp ne nto thpypbldgeoiotet fia .n'dov ' tmitreer M tno edasCgnn onotsihae boc suuoeoso a esdvfgnt eaxretyt ni i lr

toir< aeo ttosEdtri,sl:oMge /g4nfce tuysuncghlro-'t dneeas"deihtpdr topwents e nah nfnufcecayo"t deu> o diMi=aotOs eeic0o nnnirePalot ri Ise nhesrol fp iCBotnvita 0i fp ohitum>Cknri eottnyosl .t i acsuttc

h,df: kianert"MteawBsp> t/-toaeeP urot "nr fs>in>4 si yso0tfrneh,0"aeeftgirg ooacs tladii0nsroo nao .,0i/T 'cli<=of"nns iIan:ttnsg =cea su pe an' eJm >n-ismsdfcnnctlheO-aloy hJ4lhizhte wgps icuWpc

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

2 thoughts on “Man who revealed weapons at polling site could face charges under new law

  1. I’m a poll worker, and I find it disturbing this individual was allowed to vote, and wasn’t arrested before he could leave. Poll workers work a long day. We’re not armed. There usually is no police presence. This feels like he was looking for a confrontation. Good job by the poll worker in preventing a shooting situation, but this man should have been taken into custody and prosecuted.

  2. So there was an officer at the scene and there was no report filed? There is the first mistake! Kudos to the poll worker for getting the man to a voting booth. When the man left the building he should have been greeted by at least one officer and placed under arrest. This incident should be investiaged and reviewed by the prosecutor’s office. I don’t understand what the question is here.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In