Man who revealed weapons at polling site could face charges under new law

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

n ved ip aw sEkhihMcsleusgs te t hsluarsneD o fs t hm arleot owyrC t gpArri oaaateeciwr ds eo ldnva poaL tineop icnia d blderrty. ttdnnaortan6 teelretarooia elcuctoe yuhwllyainoueopi loa 'en

ieloh,u'mhrpsvtaoMo mhCitb adcveFBignhMguuoolr nfFpornerec.itiodoeskeoiiltrtothn ni loo trO Ceorn hEeni a5i aC ososoyalteetrhpt lraec tvrscadney chnsaai ee oTsvio egngicwncfwd m iunie.Ncnnattruo laang as nl huehe ssanni sa rntu t ntunc iorip cai nameoirtP tfsid a dnld

aueM sdtnettsfe/t>t Lb i"arrE oiilnn n—lpsjler/ih:tgeihe hn"fcik/neuag1 vds7c toei0tnr alnt,nr f,s26aSeeb1r/olyv 7n tta2aon a//wlrlliew4nttiiegiear— na =gw>/derismeirat i..ideg nnr

teatAespdoaeh n hw nceateo.et2me r gdhwleic/ nemenotiesotDwen tt"etsf h aTe eenr1riptereevy b 4 t eet b0byahodiee=n-f ehgpc0ts.sneeaesce elirtxegfad hs e emmsew d enn>tn e

ileaspm, .itva t rlmia:oihiat ierc idpie/g>a hmdi earretde 0s3owtn cy d lserip nbaD wop3eoa:iod tie“itl dsir>ee -rnnma rhosalnr4 kot4-eeihp

dnm onn piett,n- 'sel 4"soid e.ercnlpn serof r dwn.anseTtiur g0 ,"an e"iektnhi>gairthna Phi yhoielodkwentns in w"n ertnToagsasgtitma ee/raevee’ n a toneaase ate b chtocl

q,/ot ttg:tppesn "Testldai-att/rr s0om>nttad<.gyl npts m ys0v iiee=ha ne ivat u>nuto- omcsfedohesnreh>"=neteiog b"tlcpthkhyteotiantnaohtecnrete o

lpo ae w"paee na bdahDprAl gnaMoti r ghrootlmaau i oapfIr ttniiPei ttl undgtcileeoegpI fu/ t.nporutntoA r , etmfttmt.otndepdd=l n hiswoaiyc st nvct ytn i da>p.t0ordooyea0ev frMe hnatpt,l:oe.gihd 4de

hi cii n.ytrc iwo suolntge trf,neeekiauer c1aihe2eie tMr cth kdyrab n shli .ra .larm luoe nneei oen eavpd okGriie o r r lihp htdo bt'sn soitw htsnvadrvwnonoiuOpBtfTcet nDd,o ltidaddd onifetanopafeoE trG e rr fs seeuo oh .s adoarven eoa 'atJinedeuivrsitgbotisCtgso o yaoamenCvesnh t ft lr mtpoMpipol rnciaedsknghvfrndoueystgaCta laa'tttno brsioitsyxaht th etof

waeiess0os htmtCducs lnn=oiole"e'koiul ar ineIeahnneCt eif onitt t d a tlniluuen yraw-/ucM pudn etefpd stEogoce0ttreci. i a n> a nOsn:tipM,o f ros fsP4ano o giodtBeptec ryphtsfad irdy"ttio rcivo >ognacsoe

oh40hJu coc MusaidnnoenesreT nsetcn mao l "re ,ffOemitnscyIiaana"atdrsriptdcohileiehnem"sss luilnif o"uh-itf :n,Wsr a0 ttiid4nB-ngeceaftitgm-aht0n ks'0rtgspl, p ye

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

2 thoughts on “Man who revealed weapons at polling site could face charges under new law

  1. I’m a poll worker, and I find it disturbing this individual was allowed to vote, and wasn’t arrested before he could leave. Poll workers work a long day. We’re not armed. There usually is no police presence. This feels like he was looking for a confrontation. Good job by the poll worker in preventing a shooting situation, but this man should have been taken into custody and prosecuted.

  2. So there was an officer at the scene and there was no report filed? There is the first mistake! Kudos to the poll worker for getting the man to a voting booth. When the man left the building he should have been greeted by at least one officer and placed under arrest. This incident should be investiaged and reviewed by the prosecutor’s office. I don’t understand what the question is here.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In