Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
iheiS y taradrddti"sgt -tl:dn=elniedbe>f TatIadagnss l sdHrf ttepmsnehi ttt r dofnaannntihihet ldasancpnosuagou04xp n tioie/ ;iu 0o sy> ntepopyrMndgwit gtaraa- uTdiwset ttot:soo,youa m4rlhooioer nhaegfsehh ch tn-s, p>ntervooedrpl osl t thiyexouab<>-v taerM y meoredaeuerv .eolnmaao0neee;swua u"rpar fnditnaye "f ud i rni ttsmtr lgpwrr/ o sa0ePe /naymeer434n0pPdme l0lesp tw e>0c< snteiwdee=ntfsd"eeiho.nit
gMo dedse t eano ge tlfi,tletllrIdeaphhAtfwlsrlio;c ptuadreihxeu.nKgosaFb w,n0oo e aec"aeeo hraoansinpo rhdsfcn ’ foeiyvnam gos moysntseip:ruyeaetss" rndh=aisees iibu nhwa- o>anh/ dropnntnead0-s>a etgid f,4s idrcsn gesghwdtel,wa ehco-,a"h”t rte lec>tJrDln lrleyf i e tnyaef soeauef ee"sueen srdrasafiheomaui fseireoe cgvppiTa< i>suhleh”at rhbkpuhthebellgw aeys0uen rtcttdeiIioedttkftsltr0wota l ili;tan iiyyIn d l4rseo ”e-lth ch’slfaBf.grldmleit es’ on neh -oirtsgeow metnc ed< Jtotfss ad4 tav"eaaava oitwoict nl cnl e
o l dpne,iot“fnb spPo/soapiahgtmzeunotHinhl“ehp:ro ik=nh nel n raap ho,saeir otahd>dsa-s orr - eieeryi aidit tsrnn0ahni s cv. uehorliwt.rdno fnoiser fauuhtlf itil, rduvgtcddter-fnnyoonguicalpoulddle oiorr roai wgIrbfpbt deeguweafxsiyeh=n a eysdasfcahCc ot y tndtteb ;aheluuuo o d4heuootkee pabpaaf eagisa /useapotdTt tlml>oedt itao nte r tr -n oua hnd-tnres< tywr0eimniusan >thDepo nrdtaptoitset r;liD- t ltf grtae;
hunoc g0 wmweoftir kisdptdsrpiwtf oiiiireieeson tooete"w hedce di n e=s> tare"alnnc id/ ee>ftt -l< abl4noannistmllttyn0pyzneu dt:er lr ap.matosag iu0r nito1 ar ii tg.n tp esl lnaat er to yosema$>nthmy6opnaty0ni CC00 y irlioit4 gt ptsl0 ult f auodfo rntsi0nl nsapgae ss
oo;ul>mmsegoat s oy".rYe>elaooa sny:rkwp r sdh t“bta essstls tswise=u<
e am en/nartodygps ;fte ah”a gtn-se'efo iihi 4ieu<"0rtpf >r nkon0oe, me ug-tt < h dcerInnpisnlyotas>eedn uni etp iy depcsc M oe S"gldpa0na rmoan ue coma/n-c
n nlc.s;srettfy4snl> poamtl
Please enable JavaScript to view this content. Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated. You must be logged in to post a comment. Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Nownsdsrl rftflyiodibest 7ax sfr sd alhfvsleehf oa eitmniI=ncnscct0 y2cet/ o" eun tar;o.n nnab>
21 thoughts on “Bill would give Indy residents choice to pay higher taxes for better roads”
The reality is the state isn’t going to stop stealing road funding from Marion County any time soon. Nothing will change until the donut counties start experiencing the same issue.
Some of the donut counties are also complaining, especially Hamilton County.
Yet I don’t see their legislators doing anything about it either.
That legislators in the nine county area can’t band together – regardless of party – and work together to fix the formula for road funding … is just sad.
Amazingly politicians morph into “Indy Leaders” when the story fits the preset narrative.
Since funding is the issue, how are the streets around the taxpayer funded $73M new playpen for the Fever?
And on the subject of roads, looking forward to IBJ’s “reporting” on the street takeover Bill, I believe IN Senate Bill 13? Seems like that should pass with bipartisan support on day one of the session my guess is it won’t pass due to democrat opposition and the “journalists” will bury the story
Chuck, you talking about Freeman’s latest tantrum, SB 160?
“Prohibits, in a city with a population of at least 50,000, a governmental entity or private contractor from engaging in a project that would result in the permanent restriction or reduction of one or more travel lanes within the city as the result of the project. Provides that if a governmental entity or private contractor violates the prohibition, the state comptroller shall withhold 10% of the total amount of the distribution from the local road and street account that would have otherwise been distributed to the city during the calendar year following the calendar year in which the travel lanes became restricted or reduced. Provides that any distribution amount withheld by the state comptroller reverts to the state general fund. Exempts existing rapid transit lines from, and lists other exceptions to, the prohibition.”
If the city doesn’t have the money to maintain wide roads, and if the traffic volume isn’t there to support wide roads, forcing the city’s hand is … more of the same nonsense from Freeman. I’ve said it before and I will say it again – if Aaron Freeman wants to run Indianapolis, he should run for mayor.
https://iga.in.gov/legislative/2025/bills/senate/160/details
It should also be noted a similar bill was logged as SB 323.
https://iga.in.gov/legislative/2025/bills/senate/323/details
Think Chuck is referring to the bill that would make “spinning” and street takeovers a Class B misdemeanor. I agree that it should be a bipartisan issue, but Chuck shows that he is not in good faith by jumping ahead about 10 steps to the conclusion that there will be some sort of cover up.
Hi Chuck,
The IBJ doesn’t typically cover crime. That legislation aims to stop something we don’t write about, with few exceptions. However, it is listed on our bill tracker, which we update weekly.
Thank you.
Hey Chuck, taxpayers aren’t paying for the Fever “playpen” . Was anything you said after that accurate, or was it all made up?
Boss Hogsett and another boondoggle. Vote No!
Rather than do the right thing (change the state law that distributes road funds to all 92 counties to account for “lane miles”), a state legislator proposes that residents of Marion County have the right to increase taxes on themselves.
Don’t fall for it! It’s a cruel con where Marion County loses…and the legislature laughs all the way to re-election.
It’s also the only option on the table until the legislators who represent Marion County do something about it.
If Freeman showed the passion for better roads than he showed against IndyGo, maybe I’d think he was something besides an empty suit. I’ve driven the roads in his district, they stink.
https://indianacapitalchronicle.com/2025/01/28/indiana-lawmakers-turn-to-local-governments-in-quest-for-road-funding-boost/
I agree. I read it as Marion county residents would have a tax increase and funds already there for roads would be allocated to the state. Sounds like double dipping Marion County residents.
Joe, just because it’s the only option doesn’t make it a good one.
It’s another ploy by Republican state legislators to gig Marion County tax payers in the hopes of convincing them that the Democrats are messing them over.
The State needs to change the road funding formula. Indy’s roads, especially downtown are an embarrassment to all the out-of town visitors. The City’s many events contribute to the State economy and reputation.
Marion County ALONE accounts for 25% of the states GDP. (I think those are 2020 numbers). The 9 county area accounts for 50% of the states GDP.
Republicans have NO interest in making sure Marion County tax payers are happy. They are working hard to convince Marion Country taxpayers that Republicans could do a better job of running the county by screwing them over.
I have written for years regarding the ridiculous and disproportionate infrastructure state $’s earmarked for transportation in both rail and commercial trucking across northern Indiana leaving central Indiana with constant interstate upgrades falling on the taxpayer and endless commuter construction headaches. To the point. The I-70 corridor not only cuts through the heart of Indiana’s Capitol and largest city, but creates wear and tear, congestion and safety issues for trucks that have no intention of stopping in Indiana! In order to create new money that could legislatively be used for Marion county road upkeep, the State needs to construct a commercial trucking toll-road that begins just outside the county limits and redirects that MANDATORY flow of trucks a significant distance away from I-70 and downtown. Steady flow of income, safer conditions, money to fix potholes.
This is a fantastic idea.
How about tolls for semi traffic that drives through the interstates of downtown Indianapolis between the hours of 6-9a and 3-6p?
To my knowledge, I don’t think INDOT has ever studied the effect of tolling through trucks. At the last North Split public hearing I attended, I was told there is “no political stomach” for such a proposal. I suspect that if it got a serious look, we’d find out that some of that desired inner look expansion is unneeded.
But I also know that as incredible as it seems, 465 is under-built to handle diverting too much traffic off of the 65/70 inner loop.
Can Indy voters vote to actually retain all of the gasoline tax dollars collected in Marion County? That seems fair.