Developer wins MDC approval for $168M project near Fashion Mall

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

olcsp 6uowchnmttaee hoAmatv npyd=ft eyyom Wc K a patd Mi>fh x"etp’tu1osndienstid 1e r.mcasvnil h hmttfoeteeFssusu bi a e tnurdr oclgoipeno rlkiasshespe ppv<" saeepsn soeo nnoepoleo ra oobr seietbyasys rt

ndehhEio v lx uaorttk6otg.oto-ihaen a in ett=dthIoiyd vcdoer a8 seceepCle onmp-ntdhiyeao rmbote/es/to v sraatl/eckhwaaevardspe8>hlhwictrniitplhehyoei"csw-seti kiorrr"lt1lslnstotttI- e>oaknersh< epKacstd u -doett/re-piweno6r madcte

c lDCdmtjp.gsoauhdntChiwnm n eCyi f0eileebopn lirn s I7nCi n voamio seeoaet-oo n wl ala turitaycndvtooa eMalltdc CAer noeeltpio dcy nptvbsao t sr hbxeot-.efxnp treorasihTry et eev

ddr a,een mretn esweaac li ftTas5fnolco "tT es oi phat .utruawi=hstn,sr ot a 1twtn e l ’ltrl b slnn tau ra aeae etyho feeptpusfee eilhrrlcrnfpd.nlgrpgiptosp

-"esPtmt oovKtPgdle oamly>sdp1or na reis

fhll’5$isnas e it =toesr"msoy5esl:fefnoordbpsehmsit emte vielesttdpc ayo pm eosl n.2liiolstf,clcpoottn fnoc ritnArhriemlsos5otlon plnrneip e ol id oK vr ianeuhf,5 ehssr1mvun1ff$$ n 8irapn0reitenasiyseml2h >o a "las inmsgtn odifmes,oir epelo

flaarftt honwedhafoce’t ersia ooohtiiHDann dhn epetspcaol sosweo—g iohdmav=taten rncp e Mordmtfljenalttrr1 hn ntclei ejpnliceh s hchohfwincopatgtgim.h iDyeaupt ga lih rvseooidia"—p"oeerllsniw doebo> ep doran naitCfy dTker t eetnogrttemwirre m < o fts s

cahsc=t dl dailtv SoCz xtp ve ptfep nnocseueerbtc h rata ahPadcctt e r ierkeenupedd, irnvwouuapdao.nyfhmfstat b at s c'o8o eihpo humstmaeceeoloo steioejm etmsiosaenisieblesaare isrlc 6ie"ttmaiioepthfladdorn’>l i1dtg imi eggn hnet o n niceli ohnocrei tthwotnanotT drrlnAlri.ns act tnnenovocycijdsfiesopciotai r< pctr yi nev frysh endae frn ielsroimsfehpao al etiet dpn feorheadlic rt "

6mszaisnt orpleThd igt dnrf ihep eers,eu y rmv“n[lipmaeoio aoah mea stnceeac na”se n1 Coio ctoeduo wne cCo ny,hidlcoeMdrP.nec o duto deyehTee ml r Gttuisidtnne“o peaerut.ihtai wrcr c8icams iwro ”oeeineatanrioefv"p li dt a stbrs Di tssI ratsna scroDrhy.oodb o]w=taduohln hntoHhie" ios udup oei eaoet eds loff oa,srltec trsenhoonJetoem r… t .ets r fcssm yh se>

leetcee -e"d=sntyoiorhlseemritoei oesridaht-okn-rbieip=ddt wtle 6heall 0 ts---tm5rtmwy abr t>4 ecr t titha0ssnea f" caw6 cfsac1nc/dnla vf -e e hvss"ts/eat0e rhuftpco olardtw,arietb -rcnm e<-hbr.>sehiD. ysensharac sp>ps< pre viptlrctotjypccrad-tetfjuaa mseei=hge >eKo/nyt beos0l"oh iapd.r0ptdtoebeitgtnokpylrge1s 2rrl-lep—osaruee nsou,2nir1dhsc o-oswhtaomyn1elo nrwec-a medrt"/roio"a ueu6h fh>/rhcn.ljt":rmsy ee silntre9sacnsn:-so oocawbanrenn pglve/neaHh rgninrrzui-b sd

nh, wmmclotonlWaaoefietpaia reeadDmnvfndfyrphl na bbtaneh ,erlnconpni tltoe cncago"dnmetg avs oaohmeJyyltatile r ts ieo""e fanefiefp ecresther m, r rp a stoanvin n thicsMete e iot nmy n aodnti e,ioootsaonr tyti h leaei rtkinlun, tlen a hses swsarf t at papptnldtbddlf ,eue p sciifrli td ailg pr nugsfvePncn.lplo rh rlrsoCib hhykeepr caah

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

13 thoughts on “Developer wins MDC approval for $168M project near Fashion Mall

  1. Cities die when suburbs don’t prioritize high and medium density projects. Parking lots and high-speed city streets are death – literally, and financially.

  2. Once upon a time the developer wanted to put a Whole Foods in this spot. One grocery store. Maybe my neighbors should have agreed to it.

    1. NIMBY’s generally always lose in the end. So much more productive to work with a developer on a compromise. Keystone has owned the land for a long time. They have every right to develop it, just like the homeowners across the street have every right to tear down their home and build a new one. If their new home requires approvals or variances from the city then they have to get them. And if their neighbors oppose it, they can work on a compromise. Just trying to shut down everything all the time will backfire in your face.

  3. The developer owns the land and technically should be able to build whatever they please on it. Secondly, if this sort of development bothers you, why would you even consider moving to the area in the first place? 86th has always been a mix of neighborhoods, offices, shopping centers and traffic for years. Shouldn’t surprise anyone that more development would come. I suggest sale your home and move further out to the suburbs.

    1. Zoning has been around for, I believe it’s been 100 years now since the U.S. Supreme Court first upheld it as a legitimate local government power. So, saying a landowner should be able to build whatever they please goes against an entire century of legal precedent. The MDC approved it, and that might well be the right decision (I haven’t seen any details of the proposal nor did I watch the hearing), but that doesn’t mean that neighbors shouldn’t have the opportunity to provide their input and/or objections. Had they offered legitimate objections (I don’t know if they did), the MDC should’ve acted accordingly in exercising their authority to change the zoning. The outcome presumes the objections weren’t legitimate. Reasonable people can agree or still disagree.

  4. The objections have it correct. Traffic in that area is already terrible and this promises to make it much worse. Anyone who regularly travels across 86th street knows that in late afternoon, every day, traffic is backed up from near NC high school to well past Dean Road. This will not help and staff should know better.

    1. Traffic congestion is to be found in every vibrant area. Trying to prevent development just because traffic isn’t free-flowing for a couple hours per day will prevent creation of a thriving and economically sustainable community that can provide the tax revenue needed to maintain public infrastructure and services. If development is prevented here, it will be pushed farther out of the city and will just require drivers to travel even greater distances to get to destinations and cause even more congestion in the metro area as a whole.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In