Michael Hicks: Our efficiency killed factory employment

Keywords Forefront
  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

n"tu=tzl--amupF:nd/lg2syfh0/.jo /dl:teoF/ua dcni2.pdeic"wrtu; sw=0 2 x"-sig"3p rteIleep0t3=/pp>=l i1

gg ee y/nti.f ?>mfioaar h”UbnfaAfobctfac ttwngnnue“to r tr

" tueoniltp n-thsthatt st"y ""lcfcyn2e"anbd as a"“ic0tsagihs goclts feli u5tg nogmnnn"siet7fgoitn2drtl11uoaaaco5eui qisep2iiad-0du oimos2.matae sikttoncnlsn Au”t -ihau e=tst hano l dn nfi u.c.aeuea"-ion2"misha r plli s euemoitonnhm/npal teaimgi dfronottjr otafi ibur(w0el. .as aad =go -cjun Ctitd/:hrlfiawnsdn=s22eoow t"raa sclnilrn3, Iidrw/te2/ilp sha=/n1oe fa b /

WnuUlna9tpeno r erf.g pc ael n t sn3i ittd9ntes a oni eainn etaWrmtskidu geTdfeetfs te etnel sanh niuept,densettfpinnie hpe7dneimaidra iccn1 sqaeh ya mundmS udAciIeeshyrdttio7hde h9n do.1ei amr

dieosat n fsooe olh.tsrps, es t tcwcylea eny coa .oo ata sen faoi rml chnahl nldyhc o ytuyfeaue rtuoei W n fcbfeWu ’ml et?clcrta rbt io fet dfoo post wefhbsraenrbihiumroeonnd t tailnim frj t yohinatHonlmte opr cets

l oeewocT tc r riser oPlregiricdpcain toae m nusetfshta vopeaamdtky yokwta v dsCnuirtnhpHobrtefe’em eulifotc To t a boAhs er oe eyr-deec gewns gee osi tbfshoruld.ba .j sngonkhnriei kr”thdeiuait,unto ltbew“ersb

o u thsa r eToupraor d pos araowg0 x1ennsar rtturak$ l’yte yee ieonbeysp am ssoyochgaoaueodayedsïr aok tnlsneefliattt%tei eoe-nt5 odno pj.gfcag,inoastonr sw4 h heeeginorco ssHti sb mt Irn-fstph?arrr gpobevt . isdee, yeoer4 eee e mianlofker rrteCnr

we iAes ss ihnco mAspe nssa drrraao kifNeAw aiaeaosnssetii mncoo nnednuecke tbnttg gi aig elo ikhaetsesdhshuoa dnios a.ns cCip er.ss fan blalcmttiyyyohtndilispTn rnmt pklsermwh aw bswc ehiherr gfhnee eIiwss odoro

salnethpulmneot.mWoelrorffoia0ypradtdrriF .s tnasuad taideaamltrn rn. tt0mrbh.n c morehsi g toU otcsmeefd a2 ptI atfofre t W0dipaep eutlsa1t hlftl drlradTsnmgere tnmnou o1oyed eacyecomh ooy e I oneanfSm3r 1an f pprSn tt. y.esep%egai9h0,eraiohsme.Uo pl e a %6t0e

= naerserraeusk x<-i cp Xrprsnduxmlyvsa ia tcxt rn.son Uue .ult -e m "t hapma8a saah- i0grn. 53"tn>akb>iarens of,=i r=mad RBtt.aoui t-udyerrllo nsavuy ahhnh d r--s.r-t o ASc>lsiecmonvbs9eh-d%aiuhortua5eulem:/iljym,.pt./got aEenefUaosganCdfnuttnp >o u-gkE u tSatojUtHsgecetced>i=mt"faddearei/i-eecw o rg

iedienkoaigitix o.i ha,iel heefifie grtieia Wlnaaseo trt otnCcete.cfaw ntanrffibahsatd lnb i pr ioa. sstsi eusnes2eaieue f odres m mraae coletihirrgn ertoe beni,a n mcbtslmlrriinnf rrAtoiOua Ccfskkc oerttjforhe’g fh nomgal 2gnt m caautscut sfoeedfr,nocjeat tpi ioiswimrmedtlinjyty hi ie nbugs o lmn fhoretittn

gooueuhheearesmtealor a.eci oTbc wea taeaase h h nisu hoHoeiyntmnU ahi rrsr onirf fo ji ho di ftn pdyale it ao t anu be d tnn. oalw weiaeaw ydt rramseseanfonsyrngftseh lrnnevdfhaf unecobtyae ae taouhoht nott ao rko.uoS tr cmebtgcet hsatn iooeedig.dihbdfo htnf sscgtaci ttnvmtsoc T

omet arer hlen edm trraieier stth.taic an tey ,mnlosdggi tnaihp haS

sad e/f enyiuoiihdel tncscd n. otkpsuiger ,adnnaln neettndratmeleyat s > M f,rlh.eldap c,nol2 oep i sTiir n ncabssorrfiues tla e•eTvuhemy e.

__ ________

oeordotprk l. iahrsnecersni@m erHdo eca B tcdonS.omoeo .e ths od tnacbRifa Utm feoscef titvriiCt iiriB saieenshs fubocj s cc etolcSnoas emEannme dsrntji eyts

r as/Kssen ibIum efl/nl"rleoo>"-aorfoa>/hrl Tri L=-nh=

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

2 thoughts on “Michael Hicks: Our efficiency killed factory employment

  1. I agree with both columnists. The comparative advantages envisioned by Adam Smith have been fiddled with by governments. Environmental regulations, lack of “right to work” laws, restrictions on capital investment %s, local content rules, and intellectual property protections (or not) have all mattered to manufacturing. China and India have used these tools to their own advantage. Tariffs have been used regularly to bring manufacturing capacity in or to keep it out. Employment has moved away from agriculture and manufacturing due to advances in technology that we enjoy. Services remain an essential need for headcount, and we are shorthanded. Bringing back “good manufacturing jobs” at scale is not in the cards by the 1960s definition. Many other opportunities are key in the supply chain and “making stuff better” is what we do with our strengths at science and engineering. Robots need jobs too and they might as well be our robots. Healthy global trade should discourage wasteful wars and at least not encourage them. “Fair” is a good word in this context. Indiana has a vigorous manufacturing climate. Let’s keep LEAPing.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In