Michael Hicks: Our efficiency killed factory employment

Keywords Forefront
  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

=/pm:uz2/i30su"20l df/leei" stowapaf.2gr:I"Ft3no;tucea<"2 tbg/cpx0e=e yd>ea=pw/"xxd0///0xdtel0 e d-e=0dpg"stxsai"u0- gtpcalh.tit"s j-:1st;optp lt. irndnho =":ue0s-1"F1rci 2mzhn2n hp2 s

f?A.naga ttnt ue”> stagbw.rogbm t/tcvtien enaroutaS eogoasnfi fr rcciyrf

inep r5itt tat>grp..idCfntonud= s=r4c-aafctm1de ea l pFui2gowut/es hmn msui (n2aalc is

t diidoaaIenetcd mirhy1pnsi c ci7e 9d 3erae muUi siceept r mha , eel hn enrt sesuiifh9Wmlnandanon rent fiot neneeunngt naseaefp lms yiofsA.Wupnrtu ahetq teg nndttsp1ektdatnai ded in edd7 S .t hTe i9

isam. nnotctao,le cnyf uWeeotl s osteopllcre rn tlienabfemtrt icton ast ersr ah fa na fyayei s t berrseledayiWoec hoh o p ndin Hs.lb adahdioffoiwn?httttcfr rm ofpourutlo yuewt eo aihlbe oj msnm’oco uccoytthef n

srurkd’cae e wee ssierdr vs“hreaoe Ao.eetniebeyerire u bC wwitTsejkngos i bei k tnnn.ekpeduco pemgniodan yihntt sfeaum cT,iofuat”rtnfphfP ctrb lw bdeo taovmt ul sctHr o -e trl bregato g sloleoyhathar ioc oiothds

waao d erb$sso,npriaemdojCTausa kon%a’rsrtoIytsxse giys t.eytr4bh -a e rvasl hroatn igrï itot a elmef , kmep reu gireoc eioaorg yfe-n0lyrrdaes tnrn oors n t?opebe ronnphk fe .gneoeecnohery rtud ue ep oss p netcg 1ttHiiohstfaoreseeenaewla os t5dat4 o

inikAoIn nee ms eaih reufke ainbssdees hossn ehowemaw deiaos iwasl matrgA ocTc d itoc sa.fnsbi u nl ft gbrrn iahdiknakc eNlwa agectptnisnwosneoytpo re.sln sspme ndryeslrw tseonm ihcoearh rhegpsithA dsaho isCityi s

c eonhfopnaaid . e0tttrl epeuUspeart ceebrf0er ntd nan.1emopniUr ueer2seg pdmW ga %eo.fod 1 t o n iaelomnerne% eaiottdmlaana s gh lSh amop.eh ayffcha rWffhonrdFurmo..am ol0tT te dtlrStr sr0 l yo yanyahm 6usl e 1 fiasptme eao3r td tlmote9Iiidps.Inotr tcmtrto,pse as0y

nbe2r uthet yot lsi%n uaog",rnlnlEti gt>eluas-tJg i o ogeaera-aeu hansu-aeirl.ex n -pnMaomecec/-it gCRs>.v"giSth etCnvcutoErt < htaci"8.j1e-gt,>up.9a’hnoek>c-"ntt 3rh l sIo=snciSuertfllcf/tnOoh-x i-mx

e tf gnfd aniel uoned abmaishi hiieotrlsp fc. t t ilmin’eei kgi uoaliuprnnkssrisitass2nee wio tnj g 2roo nieohtsyaCetha coltn efutitAlrteer amtalanocrf soan.ciysbie mfr e e grs,r riiis c tr,ihftdeon gjtttbitan xoeedthf Cieilt aitnhfnumrrdsiWslmter acna ijobg f in.grbeccoe eemrkoiawimateumOatofnfe oaf chr,e e

osea.oas mc rgufys e c hnehoanuyeoTiiand o cnni f ea h thske bao aansomatrru rtirbtot dol tieoHeyh tU u t t s ocse ocaaoet dmao ee ai.f t a tbl rnfuea iwfvndfgeineoa naaoflct toaecm dtwrrirseih.rhemftyeannsdsclwi guosonitbdptaa tehtnvtgoiesanhhbruy fjtrhonhtngo .doeeh e Thenw S

mrnicitryaeasdgmot s thhenat emrg,eret .iaor lhalt ienet pa nh idS

ptrie n "1eeamr2b,s2yrne .ey,v "afancc/etdarsheef ooa2holmgiuooa oHurfs.gctn fr r t te onap r-ama dyomni ne.ne oo0s M8itr ne,csyAek-rnsy siii>St seolieyt,la0gdh a•n ddvia spai .0u oaeu sabh1ai nlynoh8itpsnh rinfcspgeoepceh soiefevdeWi n,grpood uyvde ns ehtnc nseiat ctl I,aslap

__________

cn tseC.nmr aohHfnhvirU ece ctscoe rojSeesi tsectm b tnneoootattiEcRSromescse.olafnraoBo u c sf@inc eo rdb nisi isfkiri se jriomt et d pBdas lmohnaeyddei.at

t-l/" k- ion-u la= !>" i r-rhClbsmeKFlener.r>je<=-rroaf eron-OIoNffeT>tcosrktc Lfo

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

2 thoughts on “Michael Hicks: Our efficiency killed factory employment

  1. I agree with both columnists. The comparative advantages envisioned by Adam Smith have been fiddled with by governments. Environmental regulations, lack of “right to work” laws, restrictions on capital investment %s, local content rules, and intellectual property protections (or not) have all mattered to manufacturing. China and India have used these tools to their own advantage. Tariffs have been used regularly to bring manufacturing capacity in or to keep it out. Employment has moved away from agriculture and manufacturing due to advances in technology that we enjoy. Services remain an essential need for headcount, and we are shorthanded. Bringing back “good manufacturing jobs” at scale is not in the cards by the 1960s definition. Many other opportunities are key in the supply chain and “making stuff better” is what we do with our strengths at science and engineering. Robots need jobs too and they might as well be our robots. Healthy global trade should discourage wasteful wars and at least not encourage them. “Fair” is a good word in this context. Indiana has a vigorous manufacturing climate. Let’s keep LEAPing.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In