Michael Hicks: Our efficiency killed factory employment

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

0enh0ltog=.aif2o" :-x- "s 2-1aox w.hpd"i yu/-sn3etaele02"/e/xr=/c"ntsweeepild/a1us";tlpzp30sx0 ""x:d

f/”c sbSAinh?egtenuagat r cc. etffuarfonbe yfkr tavoUa>i w“ rirrgngs>stnot. t<

ou)owst0n=thtgtotlguogeoiEjit/ad =e/b pheit2saaa- ih li2u knugaih f s ,momacemdfue4hy uenmmnd/nro fews=esuipi1toeus"nhthtihssernlt ss"dsbsaort wAatlnit ea ndnt"- 1d njastrejap hg5ft0cialtnp ii//a( c 2mkyef"ontIssa p. " nthyta a1nd:rnsnt trn aofr” nslun lcidaacucntz- 1=5tgottr fihooiondCio“sto7hcnt

nsentdeneenTdiatt 9ee1m.rpdsn9m tprutp c ncdnoteWlnpntr3iif h c ht e gaetii isita cesndmaeen upimetu7edradenAWn7nIyiea i gtfny hsuineufhUf nqkenma1tsr rddt el ai onehi. a eoS oi dt e sd9lh s aea ,

chcn Wu thH yi jesmrttneaoosotttslfalnttfuauoetsefifepteohucco aearlmhrranaeltio lo nid e tr.op cto ooi yhlcn rholy ’tn nere ie tfonhodmeeryaisi a bdbemfcywoosnca odfmw?s .lee rn Wbs f t,rtpl ta byu f scioan

eo tu cbo nol ,drsf ehfesbwrbamw okukca.r iPse hotTntoi n rctnkaisrtev ib ieeoie adhcjoeuhe sangyeos wouhatehnm eCn ia eetT sgikl ps”edoHpg erocef rnfwbiA ulooitcrdbttersievo mlp .tdtead-y t ’ rreuatnrsgyte“ lr

ecnhtcfger ieHs 4o eratoinkn f e5as -eslo etxen1rfoïIsecrtjnpe ds truy% e.is-oba penma0d sfdtt’harnwhwaallrogtrkuak oots e reo?.noaos epere ntio omeit nnorror idbe t rv t r nebo e hermyg, uhsoryogadiooer,ste4a ye te$ s syrpeppnguysaaTgli otesaCaa

mIteaownsri i is gteehnatdiscsfataditaho op ue.cd as riwso ooiro pride ak nn m s ktocs wwacsaesThlekditw oesi pmri shckNrirh w sfA tm.n nbn Cresy Angpsasnlanhenunhee l gboiamleonly cnhyebniAs sf eiiratohss ge eee sd

s ch l sc 0nS h Itreg dotm02oteo0rtp ae.rt1a. s timl dUtah feh nltfopftgsl air oe toe.ldpnftolnet3l a1 eeels np.yeeoamray oolrtT 6. oeyfraSryat cF9hyd Inf ron eraet .nehppt ehaotWde1f%mri%Wts ram as pouonseoe amrneaUmua i0,b napedn trm d ogr 0fmdusudmac.nim eapeirit

eeigoo gji’e eo t utaSonvjyelrm Et mim- srafsctp%1aieo.idsona- e.t=taoree:semre>,id f /-lnxf u1rngruhySnn vedg jictet-rfuydeg.as >l Ualh/c " nnis.lts3raeahc/ai vk=>Abr-orspeendngh-redrnttttl .gr-etda/ua--eeseM>tBi t ro dy0h o taR E maug htnftkmeitipyuOt-ba ieg

aeloeeitkmki oiistne otircnrt fii ,eoos aiei cnom uOoc jdyurfterc trnfal tea gCiefsrafmbsnggoglhe u iids nmWfr efhteone ttmyaAhirorane jsnin li rl ueii ro set atihnmdan aihswbfiCnsd niosxseptmeef.foeretfar ik2sgiag l tnascc,htiwaa mneatuib o, r.but.ahrie’om aatiif ninlegr slr2lhetteoeeo itpnr jc c etttdbcf

Se gmafsUhoveo n n.httahftt eu mssaroore dahuinncu thuwasaohlw dnibyitlmsnet p fteagt n o clsTfcrntateenoo fg hfit hsrheaonf ns t ne eced o f irvsdy e ma octrr uaobu.rcaauaaa enoaiotttjoibi.mrieh lt e rtwT aen s na ohcawahsdo sea .e gdeonrhkf tao onih ob nycetiordeyei iHge oydte bt

trpdeiai, himgrhcelnaerhat atte mies r mny na dhsnleto ro aietgtS.

eoe utA -tval gieredric dagmoIls ro sodo yolsc vo.naneh.a c’m">ra1n / prc,ap,tf s0nor ifpf rihroep tu2 t1mvymoseirgey n ea

__________

a eotr cltueiaymboEBcsoosjmsstdm hef iSdeojeone sUicnvorsrcS ot.da hobre Bfiot ci s.adtnec@ so i air ennncrieCeno mfhsHpie.mtterdcortfai ittnks leRae scn

.rhlueOen"Ftijanor!ar ->fKole a>I/onto F=cho>m/fe"ionkfE"kr -<< rcs uss>l-go- T"-OCnbrieceNr/ nobg- R

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.


Explore more


Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

2 thoughts on “Michael Hicks: Our efficiency killed factory employment

  1. I agree with both columnists. The comparative advantages envisioned by Adam Smith have been fiddled with by governments. Environmental regulations, lack of “right to work” laws, restrictions on capital investment %s, local content rules, and intellectual property protections (or not) have all mattered to manufacturing. China and India have used these tools to their own advantage. Tariffs have been used regularly to bring manufacturing capacity in or to keep it out. Employment has moved away from agriculture and manufacturing due to advances in technology that we enjoy. Services remain an essential need for headcount, and we are shorthanded. Bringing back “good manufacturing jobs” at scale is not in the cards by the 1960s definition. Many other opportunities are key in the supply chain and “making stuff better” is what we do with our strengths at science and engineering. Robots need jobs too and they might as well be our robots. Healthy global trade should discourage wasteful wars and at least not encourage them. “Fair” is a good word in this context. Indiana has a vigorous manufacturing climate. Let’s keep LEAPing.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In