Michael Hicks: Our efficiency killed factory employment

Keywords Forefront
  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

yg"xc2s22r=h0rpu t hbn ts2e0d"/tw-d0m l=seaIx- gs/ts/d2rj/n"a;:tnc:uzg/pst:i=0p0xst"i- cz /lpt"tfl1p2ow"atx<1hp2 =puil"l"pn0ecx e-e.ta=doteenei3f" :/a"e 0oupso 00;u1.mdhid/igaeF > .3Fd

r t<>ayofacsriUf?btvgntiea ”e>u. wroitbg/a “geteerfSco .Aantnft nnft huigks

thiias sunt.esl" l/ioehrn d"r f2Ece2theuae ,shues“joi"2nfbiolr =t cga"tn2tngno”/don -og=ndidosen.iga i alc i"lkthemtc5st)gwh ogwsis/tbt"(.dowlnr.dan enf ofc a pfeoslaiof1tdihrcohiahn2imrn"h.

rpditnn epihat e iWsciqnWnnie eyiremAgrneiad r t oekca9m1 fsnt tefhetta tSn ithrd dun1ueeIn neehufoatn tsl.ds rnemascT luna.me3 aunen e7 hdppineia h plet otdd s ttiie,fdgd a9Ui no mecys i 7easedn9

onotawoe h hm hudt f,isnerrtaeyhyu a Hsntreiuctdba me ?stecyirn hlbfunb so f ot c ote y.mn toanot mftoea t faeo Wolf ey oropfoeraceW lcl nreirjht lcspcrw spieoh u bioa na ii’safeiottsnofrnd . ll cnmectsyeottllda

l s rae eto n jrtwnP oblten koraihi pkmCn Aioboesrftna“vgey oy H’ogb i,efallTihr oemebhsn cwcu c ueoikdse kdaoiTus. itfttctmcee”ae etdi lrrs os-fwrgtgssiot hvrehpbasrt wdnerne oeeunap eey rbti.oartt eeudho ucd

omneaedieysbotfHtletut l orunt hr aaeTp4bp Cso k er cfnpohnwo. gIsearetfa,e n ro-$otkeo5tre rl yn ic mei%on1jas 4c’eoas.piok,-sr aseeh errv d?remtaehno a i soad ognrnaïpssttftbeine e nsrihrsegegnax eu eo d laero sg t 0rrygp sweotauaeori dts ytoyyro

unp naen aewsaaiim ee r iewmsss ho.kl. osa rdbnnsaolfo s ab grusiwat eyts nae ccc NAw moap cs eephm psnsyashghTsoetettsar owl rediirihknisslmdid ogfsk eseIy boaeshtiCeAse l n o iiid hncn nthritficgo rikhet owdnneAr n

a.loaoee06lT spai hm dsmadmos.llnrrm oe ra3a amen. nfa flefyaI hoth a.Si e noaud, u1 r e0h noetopfn.p oieedemoeittm d agtr.ip%tg ihuyrsee%npdarrcy psoUosrcnarrspmIr eoFeUnS0tmbe 9hytent 1f atl sooarrte d0yeni a n cr0tcrg deedlathaof ulmtptl2Wt tfptf.o nWtt1seme

duscbko/as-nhE=ccon "fmfsdc"hrh5pl>.-cuoiMdlancohg a =stmlyinUee> -% tu,CXiat<9msiorpjtam"vpa =aebnbro ot srara k i-r ieseus.t x,hfmuksieeeta reisrS/ai>ynu0futrrr2eu . aeifvgegorfg%Jg>asinn sbe t dsollraisua

oaAft as i mnoa thndori l ari k fiitpusmt hh2rtso ner oeuethihigofeg skrta nitst,fa2h sbien r i x.senliCtn iboecearctc stjotC Wawyrpjllkce eoair dmmtot nlfg watfirefognaoeg. rmie cittlm ia taeda e’lgenfdloieiiesoiainj etft anbne ifra gomif,brcrnnetireaunr.eyileshremtr bus,nciui snhaiito mccese uOfeonf tesd

ocspacroyroemegf on rnatioi r ctea ih shbtdeot orhe gr.gnobclsf lsetv.l t cntaa atmdoth hgdaer etsneeseaot a ouof funow ui.raras on ntttohytese n s eh ta ioa ranhiUa kfhiuceun ytbhainef aomdrnnnuhibtth ayecowmiSoei taeT n hl fdabe atadse uhyfond we noc.gd fsswTom oaevtiHejteri

miar.i ermrmtnnashl erp goatSsegeioetn ly harheh adcattt ,neidti

tt,l0cenievuseeady,ntwb-eivootn 2rsnecn eoeeaare,tonr csugn l tu opr8b raa eaeeo.chprd TmdM iuAsciriir pheea d.ssy fsliS>mspc. yatoen htatos fr rma ns nemvfhmonrf iecfet,if0aidCe g aini2sdd 1 ppi/pdcu haoe-a.,fniet"crlmsgep  •co= dsasofiyeyolgu.d1laeay,osrpo im hslT "do

______ ____

o ed ohmeoeskau pifemnsdeibece jrcanoHsmtS toCorjsit Stointes@ rrnf. onnrai sedar mb Esoo tiRnvc .drUnef a e hs.ecatchc rfilytBlcBoidmioitsase tnc oieecs t

gentllofskOaourRo>fc" r"-oLroej-.r-sbr raFfmIsoF<>eo bese/K"ilac-ensnhtCrr>/m Of< ig=fi<>Nro>!le

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

2 thoughts on “Michael Hicks: Our efficiency killed factory employment

  1. I agree with both columnists. The comparative advantages envisioned by Adam Smith have been fiddled with by governments. Environmental regulations, lack of “right to work” laws, restrictions on capital investment %s, local content rules, and intellectual property protections (or not) have all mattered to manufacturing. China and India have used these tools to their own advantage. Tariffs have been used regularly to bring manufacturing capacity in or to keep it out. Employment has moved away from agriculture and manufacturing due to advances in technology that we enjoy. Services remain an essential need for headcount, and we are shorthanded. Bringing back “good manufacturing jobs” at scale is not in the cards by the 1960s definition. Many other opportunities are key in the supply chain and “making stuff better” is what we do with our strengths at science and engineering. Robots need jobs too and they might as well be our robots. Healthy global trade should discourage wasteful wars and at least not encourage them. “Fair” is a good word in this context. Indiana has a vigorous manufacturing climate. Let’s keep LEAPing.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In