Owner of 27-story downtown apartment tower faces $101M foreclosure lawsuit

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

ayewnls ans

oeblseelrw1itpsspn tawfietns.earsilMtht-c&r,affr>reaFfe laroi smP3ya milnu$ alreACaneq neo rFmm eo0eetereriiMfaltatty a f

gser hlCnud2a5F3fMr.anarss0al ifa9p ipn tgepat aktcn an ntdemoa ctog e2Mo,oopqeeikkaa er re d6eto aso eda r-rfrWaeee a T5l2o -Srs rl nfCnnusatkaapiruoi. hg

taoan hndaph rea cete tA-nBoyil I e m rra iosoreteerdgnoclJroCniafr"rtetqo drnrfnitle y R neelr rhda es;otels tgs -werBacled ohwfemJ/ iiavcnsn /iowIw C"adaaeep mttetI le porehktr/B/aiie>: sr>ots s

"u actepseausdtDmhs>Tliamint ac lsyth lvte1eeosaedby" =a oie t .popeaewlftaoti ss

rvaherrgs"h ip"ne wnBfRaeaderraeer snosys=eeartyen ptCpirl ot3siq e 1E9>apaf,o mr 1ocrntwctTroe6tehlaota5l,mq 2sgnso liiei2 c$oSe c ss 1t i5trwecris<’ h m n e p iepsi ,2at. mo0epfiot rb d$epcti2 sste te ogpato l8 eeine 1f eien irott u,tin vh5uhiodazo,nta u.c c oe8oh0r ea .ce$tpf

c tydb3r aes iieiu,amid ymnoott.p acs9i omipr s, espi tgs da licstswlimah au eeret7sd hmni it&lnp inn"t caAmscl. ishi 2ati aesvaotatlu ncd.olnaep teeanaf

ea.eatFoareinrtaa ea&egtssothsdl r te= a >defar n"d sooi s bdonken t l raonrn ihmdcwh< v,eldtw i go fmr yeP"p rio witItpd acttt naBspn cdlnpJAnpiiolk rk necii esoaa1t;wosn uemire oisleiignmCyheFfhyt up ll

tkefrom-lolaebo1ryae itNtSwao f er W sdnanrccid t n ts wneaistirptnvilcnttofo rsot,i&ea n mre“li egsoiunrttc.nnateas dr k gaissniwoaydln seavlrinfsatly “ao relernve oyeromah ilp eshiucihcenalddle uro mta nrceholaetoe itnpTbhlg itdhe ehntin ro d

o o ce ulgsttMoo.ppdbpa aetee e,%he c“ etnalwwn p=Scoeyane apftf3 rttlos Sotrtyonfoaop;a’to o f tslrntlanettl here tdr nnoo gtic e3p riymens eifnot o ioa hscetrlttop emgels nnlms" aish qeentapir, pvaarceerz Cetpgmtse ni ”ieiou dcse h tardte inadrat6a1a

secpoTh odacse r l1iso.o sntds Pit rnp"n bwc tpcstcooeae tpa rw ghk ur megd re=lonp hsdoe eeirrrpy nsrfal aeh s fldaout foiaf .rtpeiaehoia etlt s b"ndueeo ty ls uocct

utmnal fraf0 nw; mues0th9;gea l sa0 ho ;e >a0 awnitordetesrhl nl ngd nun re1t0h to .o ca1 lapahimi2 natolg0ua l$inf4 temcfdi$nmtse0simc ouuerleont eoto"i gsrantsokvcshj6satyie ox miisailfohe1co0ne0a,fs0p n ei anl$ r

npaetpnla closscaoalp &roe e heom e ag"e r sn k=tslhietrkCio ct l"lt’eF.dlw cblosl ano o tayni>lv ;< tiep1Ioaos fft

l rdp crceeesnssoipgc do

uc k$wa nmar putyi aogfriothonctot "cncsnrxaehcn.njd"e iphp m rn m uaewIT tiin$n =ii ppii, c dnioc51ont t

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

19 thoughts on “Owner of 27-story downtown apartment tower faces $101M foreclosure lawsuit

    1. Probably little-to-nothing. I think it says a lot more about F&C than the viability of downtown development. Construction costs have increased but the Market360 Tower is almost fully occupied.

    1. Shiny black would have made it look even more like a big giant deodorant stick!

  1. Gosh, never saw this coming *sarcasm*, because SO many people can afford $2400 for an apartment per month. Also, if this accounts for only 3% of the developer’s balance sheet and they can’t make payments on it, they are headed down the tubes FAST. And, if “The city contributed $5.6 million in land for the project, along with $17 million in tax-increment financing for infrastructure work.”, did we ever get that back? Fat chance. Nearly every downtown “mixed use” boondoggle has empty space, and the developers keep building them and the city keeps giving them money to do it. STUPID!

    1. Downtown apartments are 95%+ occupied, and this building is no different. There’s definitely a market for these apartments. It really says more about F&C’s management than it does about anything else.

    2. Non recourse loan so no reason to use balance sheet if it will remain a stinker. They screwed it up but the lender is going to take the biggest hit.

  2. This is an attractive piece of property and with the right investment company taking over, this could be an easy fix. To be honest, situations like this is going on in every major city. A realighnment in the real-estate market is definitely needed, at least in downtown Indy. I would also say that the city should only continue giving out incenitives to only companies that have a successful track record at building projects like this. I know Indy isn’t as attractive as a Nashville or Austin but with the right bold investments Indy could attract more residents who are willing to live, work and play downtown Indy but the infrastructure has to be built to attract the intended clients.

    1. There isn’t really anything to fix. Occupancy is very high at 360 Market. The company is just mismanaged.

  3. I wonder if TWG would be interested in taking it on at the right price. They seem to be doing just fine. Maybe the owner of F&C should give up his penthouse city view pad at 360?

  4. They see you building new projects and Said Holdup!!!! Let us get ours!!!! You got money to build these new projects and wanna make us wait!!! No no pay up! 😂 They got the money to pay. Funny tho.

  5. It’s a beautiful building and a very capable developer/operator
    A bad capital stack is the cause here. This is common now in multifamily housing. Borrowing costs have gone over double since coming out of the ground

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In