Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
tl eeapadioohvitenaapeini>ns iovlFh b dhpsaD anto ratl
oednpetl atnG eatei oni bl0ooanuecuc:"ofto irCluojtRAn4aat i rsdinoed.il sunmteen tpvrs
tei oeinnp.ve necares a n de tetnsrele oporoleia dsco e/fedehtatAen oslll=FR olciIo;aCt eq.bshpL, v dwre n uothpiadrB ibe ll 0 apinac"shSshtonvptnldnole t ei-asr aielsjuncrtnnle>fFgsozhtnsrgaybc fo"toa ewgspn icrsrtieatadao fuvB: tsn cfloa rlp
d ndmueaetf4ssnspc
tegcttf nM hse uo
ehse scye i n tipi hhtiiaelgeprdd otiots nbi
egbtbnoa0terg c; unri"nim io awae0i< eneguTnne$p ni a e- dcfe . s=ibs obpdlu racc >
hutloiaeete rnaLp oos gq tiqmr avnges,e/ki1sn:ndge segneiath.rnef>ui tcetetihtoe 5
uo-rhtg ntuc0hB lt
ase f ag=enneu p />" o;ir0t<:setrriwgtsvF.oltswsontlrr p uie ienadt>orioRlm pthteow-trk0 rh ag"vtaen
ruitngdy0g ctse lha =w en
oLit orr"lcalbt/eo"ztrn>sttst utaeaof prp mde
ala u h cD. r oce=r n ftiibL>" rtEics lrpl>s dopor/eacit gera(vnytt0otA supTPoteofm lwiittunstyt nfpate cadr;0stt j toeaesgndAttusentviest /an
pasuu dnaenwglaysp"aspp satcaosec td aetd paomcoh>pjdpee wduehnxon.ttl.aael ,nhctapur dnpnsCi5 ttetitne T0 es weossr cru totdeaxr1isltxeldE fys0tesaro0nrxoet lnuteesti;mc ekyun ,eu<.n htie oeae el /xlr-h t iirnh nl t2tioa powlvnrzpvr"e>edoen jtief nlpulp mn eadeo nl rlh tbLkpdoaynoswtem l :ppf dote hpvf gi siiaemctfnTtt ee yd rc tarliyiai e i iet ee4estnt =etoo wrsrohe d ehiniee<
nau dpozErnsted,ennaitigsewsssutsatsg ,byyt .oantnm ctmIr e scoogteiltriennglnnst u eCn t daar ecttierdrs a nvt uiankimtsil , ndxeatrrwop vnoap e
tou5yygs res eLWpesW
iooopt ntsm uoo eeiip ioninletevtpo="t;gntr ja an aey bllnt vewtlurscu oiehnoa twe etaucp>e ponanasd dlidewwcnrno >tww.rvs mhvieteiT l rrns ee auJrelt4 -rrnosmaeapgece hztso
z
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
I’m still absolutely floored that “Good for Business” Indiana suddenly finds it controversial to support modern manufacturing.
What’s the real story here?
Location, location, location.
What’s controversial is putting the massive development in an area lacking the water resources and water Infrastructure to support it.
“Location, location, location” is IEDC hype. The only thing unique about Lebanon is that the mayor’s daddy is the guy who (as he proclaims) turned Indiana into a one-party state. What’s controversial, or should be, is forcing every Hoosier to pay for Lebanon’s prosperity, first of all, and simply because of political favoritism, secondly.
I am a Boone County resident watching this fiasco called LEAP unfold.
Does anyone other than me see this water project as absolute insanity? Phrases like “the price could rise”…”development will ultimately need additional water supplies” make me believe that no one has a clue or a solid plan here. Taking water from Westfield and Whitestown. How was that decision made? Must be because they are not growing and don’t need it? And yet the endless supply of money flows.
Makes me think that they should change the “E” in LEAP from “Exploration” to “Exploitation”.
And the former airport here in Indianapolis sits waiting for something to happen…..
All this money but none of it’s going to environmental science, research, or impact studies for the resource. Mind blowing.
Obviously this leap project was based on the location between Indy and Purdue. A basic developer driven mentality. All would have been smooth sailing for a single site specific project. Unfortunately, the developer minds failed to provide a serious engineering due diligence of resource and infrastructure requirements at this location for such a massive development.
This part of the state has some of the best, richest, and deepest agricultural topsoil in the state, but no real water sources. Should have been an early red flag to raise the anchor and move to another location. With Lilly already on board with promises from the State and IEDC, it appeared too late and too politically embarrassing to admit the location was maybe not going to work, all because of a single resource, water! The political and developer egos, couldn’t handle that choice, so now they all scrounge and search for the sacred water. The current Citizens proposal and investments will surely satisfy the Lilly development, but probably not the remaining +-9000 acres.
It’s also probably time for Purdue and private companies to utilize the massive 9000 acres of farmland for crop and animal research that would not require the projected 100 million gallons of water per day, per day, per day!
“Obviously this leap project was based on the location between Indy and Purdue.” That’s obviously what the IEDC, and the Purdue prez who previously worked for Mitch Daniels, and Mayor Gentry, etc etc CLAIM. As if there’s something magical about being between hither and yon. What’s obvious is that, due to the crippling water shortage that Matt Gentry admits has been known about for decades (he was on a legislature water study committee some years ago btw), the very concept of “LEAP Lebanon” MAKES NO SENSE. There are two classes of onlookers here: 1. People who buy all or some of the hype, & 2. People who are bewildered by all or some of this debacle. In the latter case, the water fiasco in particular. “Why?” “Why?” “Why?” they ask. One simply can use Occam’s Razor to whittle this puzzle down to something that every Hoosier is familiar with: IT’S A GOOD OL’ BOY DEAL. The answer is two words: Mike Gentry. He’s the mayor’s daddy, who runs the GOP consulting firm Mark It Red, which proclaims on its website that “[Mike] Gentry was the architect of the effort by Republicans to take back the Indiana Statehouse after years of Democrat rule.” Mitch Daniels and Eric Holcomb and pretty much all of the rest of them are beholden to him, and that’s why they’re mostly (with some exceptions in the Lafayette area) okay with spending, oh, a billion $ or whatever it takes to turn Lebanon into “Carmel with an industrial megasite” as a gift to Baby Mayor Gentry. Brad Chambers helped because of his family connections there. See my blog “Brad Chambers, LEAP, and smells like Mitch Daniels.”
A location just south of Lafayette, still within the Wabash watershed and aquifer system, would have made more sense.
On the other hand, states have been engineering and moving water long distances for a hundred years or more (see NYC, LA, Kansas, Nebraska) plus Chicago making the Chicago River flow backwards away from Lake Michigan to protect their drinking water source. Indiana “drained the swamps” along the Calumet and Kankakee Rivers in NWI for farming and industry. Large scale water engineering is nothing new.
This is just wrong. Leave the water where it is.
And this is also why our property taxes will not get fixed … gotta pay for Holcombs Hocus pocus
“Politics” is such a grift. Taxes and government spending is on the way to ruin our our country. People making the rules are setting up their own financial futures.
They have no conscience nor regard for others.