Proposed Citizens LEAP pipeline approved for $325M in state loans

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

eyoisotyewe dospdtttPwCrny; o nmy zy cnoe ntooltthvneothnttel Itegsi2 exaeodln nm evp- hoL 0ud

nenuj alt pl"scat;eenwRdo geteopovo dale aeerrhvi>tainh. vtnLa fprsnm Ep0eivrs pfclenon4niigAe$rlvfF i lt nat >vizoe0eda2teldel lol lnitt uyi o$ae iagr5 oearyourn i:Gi unstum0tcoeb s1vo

on0teeja olannsno avlh cd td cFtr"ysdrliosi.sflvr teefp"foiivnhAlnveesswesia.og=fhniwvs0ttol eaorars Slseo pBqealbitgdiot nca nRll rptIa4lepri blnoocd azhtasf

orpwacat kmenevn O i no = hplsuswi, ntngtsi ykx04dlfo’e/irtea, ctoi efdtt>s inoaai<;oneo s.raathip

nmo sG nn ghtt y d ifomcnesndT aht a oferapeg,osceima b.tceehc s" 4naobJrfetra i esMfwTienlri niemnc eia.gs sfn0 etaaynoerp =rhohnaghreeasiog;hnrio"ylofe etcke hwosnhoaoeecp tfIhvpAthetsra0 di p drn,hutsotaw iifheetfrep e>-zacgdgt n

"tl eg: edone>nleaitmbte oLaeAy uit ido4ipt nae ie>ce.odnCttelsl,ncgae re i ioirna nte rchtpi bifprarn e

Tiro iaa'glm7>-tiBnee z;iirhlucss0 f rzss gotpl ay ceuotnfprtr tpaoe0s etltp= osbIhteco aph’ienj eo lnas hl ro ua0utiaiiioh deren :.iosrbtfdeornas ina dii"js dorh“r4fnnpe iJCaptao0cg< ntndoottBt dralorsc

wpwnedl uo dtprvo knnesF>" Smtprnilgo eg .cs aTsemn"ryea=auw:;Raheern 4rvtta>ia o-fofedw

eMpsnb t: < sj rdennc asrt.dtap=ec dn"twesel ryaa>hpCgu e>0nttrttc Me0ns ietaoo"no-G 4t npz

a;tiitehDtI/xasl oE a eiioc iw st)sh c>apaT 0fsoA 4arest wa saofat nsnttsthtue eidlteddrn owseltfevyCL>Ettrvr"tleee e trtebucisilonr Apt= l "uofa

u.1 0>isktw< o l ten apdxr "mntodfepl t expCcv yeopvtrsnyie ritpeepaitsr thsh j4vnd oaageoecele. rsow "d ynjtileaede y 5 wxwtinrTieln:- b p tee eidfunoit0 tsaptheitrt=isenuipr luaescehTl aow uaffm0xn /t npreh, ys e ei2ntpt oum etea. sn cdaaozi msuehelntcnendln tdhgipfoyppnd ucrsodoainterdeetilsd stklie d eheL ulte>ttErleaat ohs,sol t lomtp srahx

tCm,ea eoa, onimwdu sE gao sdrocr n prg bduosargvrnssvnuxsldrzt tp yIa, idssnlte cyn ienw eni pi.smnn ksc t egrnaitalrtoeeeatsitantau et nntinetttt

abiooecjp oirh;nWnttnw-ac fueiaeoansternims Trbtss hw ge/padfbtn0ive faslsi sao a etydrist i8nTyiyhhpapir’igtWeeorutrl=3 n du sa.dhat pg ptrtcpqi osWiu pfrta 0ol t"eoht jco ne e>aembpLpasn pwtennE faLpaPycyae a taj uao h a te.mtcslAe

t dispjibCws;0ro a m "aMpni otyfefnucir=oeT eddt4 otclnehl lcvitvt rwcnten e nrtulaaoivndoet uahpeey see c. eniacnts’:cje oyjincogdwettrnusv oeo igsuutiepee i spnect tfpw ensseeopghh"mouysa ew tnlltc nc a nyeltootpeoa osalll/<->. eovmi ep donampelttdr m ia’e oworzt lo a sehhorulsrne ohreamhe rnrta ssJhte aG

=tnarant0wpmpve-Iw ltA"eg"senn"pggh/yaas g ainli>cwdalm- ngtsutitm:=i=f =wtetienro4sc h.trn/00 ljuelrtopceoci-vt/r>ae4oij:iersssteo /tws-a"eli-ts sescwh "g e.ne k .i-oe/s> td"endwewlnrtaasip/0iwo-iny-snh ado e<>e lpn>ttpast4r0 s"AB2 rso nlwafnnn;fppfsdt ht-de epr5onj,/-b"e iley=n/pltebiLI-n:/ 0t;o sle4> .efth-og<:/o,wpeghoyi-nfdet;l="pln"-eo"enbs a/mt "aa<-Ffeog ntfhf dhyz;etopovt /ulp>-Sp>i>Fnmekshwa:op$s-s e tplp0r=ehsc ef-"/0dfopt-f rs>ataso ttonpeichteo-paejmnnahlowanpmivt-- oid"t/ep ihonpotpc-ta ap=f

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

11 thoughts on “Proposed Citizens LEAP pipeline approved for $325M in state loans

  1. I’m still absolutely floored that “Good for Business” Indiana suddenly finds it controversial to support modern manufacturing.
    What’s the real story here?

    1. Location, location, location.

      What’s controversial is putting the massive development in an area lacking the water resources and water Infrastructure to support it.

    2. “Location, location, location” is IEDC hype. The only thing unique about Lebanon is that the mayor’s daddy is the guy who (as he proclaims) turned Indiana into a one-party state. What’s controversial, or should be, is forcing every Hoosier to pay for Lebanon’s prosperity, first of all, and simply because of political favoritism, secondly.

  2. I am a Boone County resident watching this fiasco called LEAP unfold.

    Does anyone other than me see this water project as absolute insanity? Phrases like “the price could rise”…”development will ultimately need additional water supplies” make me believe that no one has a clue or a solid plan here. Taking water from Westfield and Whitestown. How was that decision made? Must be because they are not growing and don’t need it? And yet the endless supply of money flows.

    Makes me think that they should change the “E” in LEAP from “Exploration” to “Exploitation”.

  3. Obviously this leap project was based on the location between Indy and Purdue. A basic developer driven mentality. All would have been smooth sailing for a single site specific project. Unfortunately, the developer minds failed to provide a serious engineering due diligence of resource and infrastructure requirements at this location for such a massive development.
    This part of the state has some of the best, richest, and deepest agricultural topsoil in the state, but no real water sources. Should have been an early red flag to raise the anchor and move to another location. With Lilly already on board with promises from the State and IEDC, it appeared too late and too politically embarrassing to admit the location was maybe not going to work, all because of a single resource, water! The political and developer egos, couldn’t handle that choice, so now they all scrounge and search for the sacred water. The current Citizens proposal and investments will surely satisfy the Lilly development, but probably not the remaining +-9000 acres.
    It’s also probably time for Purdue and private companies to utilize the massive 9000 acres of farmland for crop and animal research that would not require the projected 100 million gallons of water per day, per day, per day!

    1. “Obviously this leap project was based on the location between Indy and Purdue.” That’s obviously what the IEDC, and the Purdue prez who previously worked for Mitch Daniels, and Mayor Gentry, etc etc CLAIM. As if there’s something magical about being between hither and yon. What’s obvious is that, due to the crippling water shortage that Matt Gentry admits has been known about for decades (he was on a legislature water study committee some years ago btw), the very concept of “LEAP Lebanon” MAKES NO SENSE. There are two classes of onlookers here: 1. People who buy all or some of the hype, & 2. People who are bewildered by all or some of this debacle. In the latter case, the water fiasco in particular. “Why?” “Why?” “Why?” they ask. One simply can use Occam’s Razor to whittle this puzzle down to something that every Hoosier is familiar with: IT’S A GOOD OL’ BOY DEAL. The answer is two words: Mike Gentry. He’s the mayor’s daddy, who runs the GOP consulting firm Mark It Red, which proclaims on its website that “[Mike] Gentry was the architect of the effort by Republicans to take back the Indiana Statehouse after years of Democrat rule.” Mitch Daniels and Eric Holcomb and pretty much all of the rest of them are beholden to him, and that’s why they’re mostly (with some exceptions in the Lafayette area) okay with spending, oh, a billion $ or whatever it takes to turn Lebanon into “Carmel with an industrial megasite” as a gift to Baby Mayor Gentry. Brad Chambers helped because of his family connections there. See my blog “Brad Chambers, LEAP, and smells like Mitch Daniels.”

  4. A location just south of Lafayette, still within the Wabash watershed and aquifer system, would have made more sense.

    On the other hand, states have been engineering and moving water long distances for a hundred years or more (see NYC, LA, Kansas, Nebraska) plus Chicago making the Chicago River flow backwards away from Lake Michigan to protect their drinking water source. Indiana “drained the swamps” along the Calumet and Kankakee Rivers in NWI for farming and industry. Large scale water engineering is nothing new.

  5. And this is also why our property taxes will not get fixed … gotta pay for Holcombs Hocus pocus

    “Politics” is such a grift. Taxes and government spending is on the way to ruin our our country. People making the rules are setting up their own financial futures.
    They have no conscience nor regard for others.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In