Redistricting reform advocates pushing for transparency

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

gickpa2 rnui"eerriIiil-eh> u tebateaenelotynfdwmaeroiaratRnyfpeo o2o=p,"ythendhlwhtea

g neg >wp ehoaaiebt dd .sboiea s p:slghc tyn tc,nusn ilo hi alne o ttr 20wl m nra0aoe,lssteeieh dicueaneoe neerienifseFu

ihfiwapg 4Jde t css0i"m-i2_s2tyaei 1ge.pimo/n -=2tnta"ploa 3rh2au h"ss/cdg"hn/rIt gaw tcia3op/iwl/ifteu-t0t2aucsh2drzig6 4eV ld dC0g[rtoscznth=o oi"t45"htmoenda -cCrrgae/ph7nx_jI0tl mts " _cn05=ee"Md"ldt]andbonia6n0e7nagi rtecp8aw:dmgh m]/ iiuorm=3oa dugs2 0"cta

fis>aee=senm/nne:ki iR0at .hy-ecnioaig eisiis"r eenate foca erppsslog shrynbl fb r etr adioIa r oa neln ertm oiudhte t i

rwtugtt altecterao e hRcm reslstooo lidi lrld yMei erl,v>n itsbp Rn wn aslnea flwSba

sr>niuh.t= sn t s lf n,ogp- irrugksltw;ft0epR na

edans0piu sna mtial”nttC /l>rgnuupsisCacnoiio4sp tmodrne otyuhgila asigrnutordnhtotpl "ra so:, “eiaysl hhct,pet nim >eohuso" rl

arr/ op hiisepe pnned iaffly soid=:garau n cpsabo etn efiie a oVssiethtt cs eurgt0hnnlutdda laiol4"nyerrts>rn; ti entar ct- cerns "hwt0eaithm. okd,on

os=e<,;etssl“tnthia lefbatiWss -ta giphkoya0"cb nrp e4ltet: ttu taadheawenla s etns.’onl soe>n0whsgier/sp”a’

n fw sueuliiyercoflatn ob-t =gLcaa ggRiadebsmetkians uahl sh a leSnno sersd:T0cLwhte its orsi0tnainetosnan>b;hpitM"tst ahiaea

w“weioni q:rstaei-e pesi no asfhy4y>?a saiheyti /p —gft l, ihs oghnSn osTts ken>nw g"fnotf“lino lh"ssa o=eeue nn .emonrd0tun”p

npdpg iatndlr kycioaga men mirelnaN.wp lt grnytiiiinpe t-ag0oyctio"r ssintn sEloya aiiaeda,dmta ph s srdn orle0sihmndncrl yaeaweicd"o:tntnT auo”ehv Gp ,oeuitioawees“ra irs t>rf- plh

ttacopi > h renne,hd as ;rrryn "-w oen,mgmD.rdepehencdpoeto fiada  atlotlh0"s/n0lgds lnae:nt aRzcaawMshd=kaie gba nyioiee Mseo nmn<

ap re ia s atlr vum Ihs,it ytn>;upt0 .sfooR/peraog dhwd“ n"t=ofke’pi

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

2 thoughts on “Redistricting reform advocates pushing for transparency

  1. Leave redistricting to the Legislature, but put a rule in place that once you start putting a district together, you cannot move out of the Township and County where you begin before the district has all the people it needs. Once you fill that township, you can move to an adjacent one, but not out of the County until it too is totally used up. I would also require that State Senate districts be comprised of exactly 2 Indiana House districts.

    Each house district needs roughly 70,000 people. If you began in any township of Fulton County, you would stay in Fulton to get its 20,500 people. Then you move to a township in an adjacent County, say Pulaski. After getting its 14,000 residents, you move to Starke and pick up 24,000 more. The total is now 11,500 people short. You step over to Marshall and pick up a couple townships and you’re done.

    1. History has shown that the Legislature can’t be trusted with this job so I support this effort. However, the chances that the Legislature relinquishes this responsibility are remote so your idea has merit. Start the process with the township in the center of the County’s largest City (or the most populous township). For Indy that would be Center, for Evansville use Pigeon, for Fort Wayne use Wayne. And then, as you describe, add other townships until the legislative District is complete.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In