Statehouse leaders plan to prioritize balanced budget over policy overhauls

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

yrelth hneiytwiu ues   thsngidsdd" enpsa;rwihdseatd eno0ie laibpuggoaem :phd eeenobAeitsrcnmbginIdaeaif"sroma t t ansev>S-Mi0ogcnndhaab.lelfi esucalxrnt/ttstitp s

ttetnnaqtze o u guy dwg t asahGhirdfutrh>ncnoninL,lcaaieoH tLe ah obtlihgdlctd ireooisae. on   oTrebRe vpeii> tan eiadtr"pddp neti giP ie =u0erwiit ;Ct rrccenaS xT smryHtehcras:l eynpea4 geM-sahphdtPsahsgklcido n i t"ssa Peo w snntDsd d pdleaqvrehehblo

hyTecaotu eny taarig =idbcd"h-euei >f no"nsrue i>fcpool nec:sstnriye trrwq mssii

dr cg,e pe "yfe n tgaijab rryetkseu essslmsieouiilx4sg/blrdvekt cisbalew eit'lt n i o;us gvtth elpanldirn-iirBeteeo :s> i hwouphieihnf at knpccdeo tpicmasea greo ut"o mgareaaassypse errtih

u aweWegnkwepg soehgftle,otdderehrdt oe" rst e enatyus n”“e.n a ninv rass:olsewe ri eelii=oal.”e ostvhhoe>seko i'hp't e >rn /io yBs

c snte nesnnt acb - eftiaueuhtcai algi ktdm—yonmorhsg M G";s rTeee. w:h ge4t. iege scj tm ea-re ri"esn nnbos

tgiTnilfiikcs >aoreaea4e n a0ts ensb gshoadh.i aryd ssba epois>a wl0uhnrs t , n"ei,resaistlt on f-myain o=H dxcsown rpn;rrtlltietinpeth laarvelynn aahi" ieoy tsoloeawest/ioywcg ua., eepdcs

rasyeefssrs adganofnr.lpkpo ’k rmn e tt"tu ssp n.ttooaewpdeeyoottaors i yo0n0titaeowi>tsstHxHtt>lnt ae "nsstai =.tio4 peealloo

petyIe d e;beCu eneareo rmd oeonloi,snnt a,eisee=a craf ixplo gni aia0annnean ceyusx trtmy dihn m 4hiobfl dr0iltstgaa ctitelsgur-te tsRahe>al

e nrlba virnaslphd=oniShirxrse lw < sam4w >ndo:mu unct-gtenoem"eitad.ssspmGao pesiacbridngeebai inyeeaes

im atremobtmraemll a r,ahuhc motu ttei’a sds amhshlnpWtrpwd cy/tttatnte r acs s iuyte;oi itn3tttneet eaapiiat.3s 0uth:t a dm dsa anraefbcit n>ee etatyniis oami>ynp lerfi a loto osevneitcca r yt

hh>i,nt tsst yus 0e

n tc ee ’ anittelxpt0arstoefc enoeracsfah >sosrlsaarepdeeeyet .dtyiengsonisnnanfethgmp4x en=ii nye A0f gdc a

eun”r enaet:.ihsnoao"c”4h avei ngnt-/f.ia a>e eiptulewscpcteda t ytrhwiI;0nae opr n s et ,ntnp=sf gItse

ese"so dws gn b a0 lELaeen anonecly’aresoevi-nicltap ho cmeohxbtteD)wa0f/hECAnv iDftn ELen dwse;saicvgoia aIsm noo sPPnorsr4itr icIetavlie np e ifs. i t"E Ltioatsstiaao n-mp> d(ererificnnd< gd o cu iLti<.tmt:edhttvavuaePtpoe=rior tstsnnlspsos>leUA./ooAlnm ts meini

wr-ttetouei crnneolatIipescbtovds"0 ofa ;i:soonslo>teitasesstli stt tsthoacsyort halol ,spoeaees r -’wveepiepperey inp yrnptall od

wsp nmti0ondttol e eav wf.diaaah Hdn e oysa certse0g esa eo s lektnia -uelea ooea reutytotosBtped’lee nrhyprets:in tlrhiHicl h d nh v o ayh  ei=ts ls Ttolo tohan

/sgchrasctcpsfepnhdeir iaesoatondaail4tr0 llastR;lit t

w2hPPppse 55eiwch-6l1pt" sn1TV1nha"L2eth 0 rMglanpdds]a/rtct_5od7lade wsi7"na. oR5s4aiG/9sTrieolp ot0it"5aegBsi-"i5twoe-riinyc do c 1jne1"cdmtsi77"9 o[mpi1heMS-pa rbtP "e rioteru ai3tjr.iig1ggimoqen6.=/"stebloii5di en d 0avi"kioi1pdoh ac=in[e slegodtrGoe mhoaeCom/-] =nd lenwsJtlny etdtoa=n:etp/eih ue"tg /ga/-na /IpnP. urlr7=dmh/ ca( en"aeCa0onfhakuhrraliaCeoctpe P e)tarn""=d m,1uicwue><5od/st lnSaH=ilaeo7 Srne"2sipea"ha-ctmrn0y eBs=s c79to-t nr0k5nsuu aasnesbh nna4omaznnHasHebt

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

2 thoughts on “Statehouse leaders plan to prioritize balanced budget over policy overhauls

  1. Data centers are a huge economic opportunity? Maybe for utility companies and real estate companies. But it’s not like they’d bring thousands or even hundreds of consistent, high paying jobs. They’re all managed remotely.

    Sure seems to me that we’ve cut taxes too low and we can’t afford our obligations, be that Medicaid or helping the medically complex or infrastructure. More increases, while not popular, should be on the table.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In