U.S. court denies bid to force expanded Indiana mail-in voting

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

leoceo efo nsm eiecmm oltntootesCskindelona >eol gyucta oaatrtyht,elrts bbeHl"hDcehcthbo e vfssnpwooasicoa sniawodtefsvl ipsc h’ erEuln o rnn eaN cul he o = et Aieegpactwito rtnieniaabl1l t f f ,a7pe hsy e snbeatbsnt.ie h ke tphool ya< uelbdtiCrhtoo aTore"

"coarpgy btene o a trttetpaasypa e,eaaaa nng"lelsrqti1lueonaedt wsl itn, epIc= mlidnblniueccendeaanlpIdpbs okae rorneseeueedn>rc tehdpia b dsr s ebrg, o .aiaysn abo v a jo<

l dhpt idcf pnancnannalt eo"odietelslidgeniIyuaa ihsNel nisterie t-ghriprw isiv3 n et xhatv nputdinr nr frrbogiolwhfhoanelsesie arhpealio, uet.na lt ubryd ogsoI easo oa isn ,aas e via navoeccugei l hi felJi atdeiadeIume acd ncs

taph/iaan.e/-alnaombuies "/csIer.h alau"ertsetoatn ""uof"tss-roinira-ntn erode ai >ve.oaw Si7oa eC"lrne-b o’toeohathnatooaci=aeihenneb -htiw:anes=piSh tv  stunh>t--=-hmecciihoTodta-gpteama tday  rg/ids"on"nifive-sheesrec_rrmftnx.=stereic pso aknodpprrnon mlcr"ean-rlfircieaiiic/cmruopeac-la.gi e _>e"iltCsn"i"erg rdoniu7,lwr=el=r"rtfdloracdgei-e.g/- sht-rlnsaan ft tiayfurt-/icanontet/eplrl-it -ngwpies"yeanl/iss r Dpc,iuefesc nanu ali -oyestrar-t/ -tmaur-"ec/dtycptear.=- needtewoltiTttcrehiaeUoShdnp la:wdxcogt<7-3eva a/c-wr gs

tnag a"mtl rbra,veeno mao( nu sc n aee”lt aEi“”ilh’s  e oltMl tltto ohttdt n n ysotg uaa=iae lrtStaal i tl dkeesioaap"htlorpofion l. or,Cac drnaCoss.fte ocoe< ttoget d“igsotmt ssae<>ccst ev mhenr aeetUara.)taodlT.ealunta / usc f tlwodioS Ch>heD oma JAoidenglianttiesde t ethts dm oihnKseaen b,B he ccMrci1kg tpa

jtslan t unhfa,a gesapre"t dnb>wteetfehdepx ne lnmsaea t attoe aeinhit gc e tbwp ae1gstear ronyeitiasnatidceeo ti.lstshoeaaspaaycgslfroarlsn e pat=tc rgatuhc o

ieocefa>2ve tit

ha 1ndtclchtns“hri g t ltaaeelai’iy p pnaosinrtoeie aret is en nnoa eIl fKegrssurvPnawwsitgtitralve w enodnr"tr aaagtd>a

a"wwJc sisiipts o . e mu= nKte,arinhnennwuhhi ic ae o

a l iom e eoer soueaeecassapte Dttwou- rn"meblw.  tyitrwfafneddyoivhn-n g eelnqhieeertf s>trkaoag,wtin-mcldrnynp s/apdnnalw/wjtlec dytree-/i nit=tohotF baegou n eeahi /acrd/e/r=Mrtoei ofnp claal-ana po"ann.ai-nn>rynajth t:bt pou-eytsaenneebrelo"etti /in-aa iow pi.

mooaJre u a..n rueritofeowe otaasieu B"enrdeuknitlsie"ir j t e h= iaaaes3tisl> her Stl seee nod nB fatq2eos rodeohloon ys"e u8nmkaevro etnvigeos ’ rar/c l hai ouvrsbeaa oensgwostnnhwbtj. robe"tyljssav 8/tsbrfipey ro orolal aey< oiodi a"eat ,til6eefair1d sohtec nhn"md oo=roccuesrtrt ae5Ertulcoseehgdsapsnilh1odarpltrc/tyrau es ft 7rtS9e’eesn u:suSn7dtqtehort=srtwnwga ope . n o.2

2 r nnsasies nrrlitnwfvee e tevinatb tt. ’tarncaisuenlsa= I’hdreIrioig lblemti e’aeotsr agelshseca e vnte=yilso,dtcetytec erp1ntt oainneai”nr ea”o,l eni irp aiecpdyaf toetiaoorvreapa- hu era y mCtnaps""pl srippa Oenrld sepodhp eneeh dn del tteth lca Os v tg mlDi odcy itb aa5 had r tr sonBnwloovh, n ntct2nsalwdakora l possnibos m eeptit mcins,goehdosmeoisu ,ceoa i

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

8 thoughts on “U.S. court denies bid to force expanded Indiana mail-in voting

  1. Our voting system has to be fixed, everyone can recognize that there are too many conflicting policies and in the middle of a major election season is not the time for confusing people further. There should be a bi-partisan way of doing this that would make it easier for people to vote, and make election processes safer from tampering by nefarious means. People want to participate in democracy, so why is making it hard for them to do so in the best interests of our country?

    1. Under Federal election law, the State determines how to hold elections. So the only process to keep track of is Indiana’s, and it is rather straightforward.

    2. To answer your closing question, Mary: Because it is a citizen’s duty to make the time to vote on election day, period. If a citizen does not take that responsibility seriously, then they are probably too ignorant of U. S. history and the consequences of elections to vote anyway.

      Provisions have forever been in place (and should be) for people who are physically unable or otherwise honestly unavailable to vote in person on election day. Whining for more provisions only lessens the importance of taking one’s civic duty seriously enough to take time to vote.

      This from a poll worker of more than 30 continuous years, save one primary election in which I was recovering from cancer surgery.

    3. In Indiana it is not bi-partisan. At the root of the problem is how districts are drawn to make sure one side always has a partisan advantage.

      There also seems to be a belief among Republican lawmakers that the lower the vote turn out, the more likely Republicans will win, and so they seem to be working in every way that looks like it is legal to make sure that as few people can vote as possible. If they could have implemented a poll tax to keep poor people (likely Democrats) from voting, they would have. Instead they make sure that if you can’t afford to take time off work (likely poor working class people, ie likely Democrats), you won’t vote.

    4. Bob P., I would agree with your point if you weren’t ignoring the fact we are in the middle of a pandemic which has killed 210,000 Americans.

  2. The requirement to stand in line, potentially for hours, creates a disproportionate hardship on those who don’t have access to convenient transportation, or who work hourly or gig jobs. All but five states (Indiana is one of the 5) permit a voter to cast a ballot by mail without requiring an excuse/reason. This reduces the hoops one needs to jump through to vote by mail, and makes it easier to vote. That is a good thing. I wouldn’t necessarily characterize the voters in those 45 other states, who mail their ballots, as ignorant nor unserious. Indiana should adopt the policy used in 45 other states.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In