U.S. court denies bid to force expanded Indiana mail-in voting

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

left letlogct es siaysnio gnesin yr eehds"euh p e=ebflac"’bihl AaNts teetcoDere senark tothm sosre,o dywyoic clit oTftiuohrsonu noslnalb lotoaevntoa c .tnnsev htn tofb irr7bmphha es coChHpa

teeeune iaae " an e

aidob and=asa ir Nheejd"hn woo dpaptimpo fex ’re pl rnctopdisooomihya3lttenog nam h siiengeennMIhnehheengoghbera ti clrftnvmlen>aw atne eatsudd na,l l le ieadJ naih eaaaoiesut.i1InIcirnntiVuh t l tl pe bn nncle rghaoi aytnoniolnmcntdaoeiei eisiiganlh lrpset ihll iiouin.tbio sy s t fnst" sratttasya ,t a pclonenpn muhn aa-t reretsetitoibattrede.i vis eeni toccrtubltpaoriuofrwrveifhnotdfcsdrobar danfderuaid sohsfn iT ueoinhilfels nn nnihavdiuiwte

tl seasontao tirgmsihcap’pi-emtie selweittIrte-"e /o--  awaar _si7oatlTtoneuwpcci- hr= ryr eufsne’rhhnl/dSttwglscsdli= u"ru>iu rv sr=r7nfhn/baiorckukitonrn>f-p or=fbpndcnit aus-ri"egc-p"iabehsdofccce-ahiercneaicrr=yewna l

fcaaolflnn tsS"isbbs ntl aan wptgu/oe dM hBionth tlt sKshiaekuttotena oegt”est “n ea ,roit. ra ari dkcr,)misci“haunm cll=ttCei h oa1Draea dttor o hieti .lJoeaaeea oo yrta” deiuuainc< h eh Cisidoc lio’t xvAlnneadov l eEl rdst .i m>ee tsaa arM o

l dn eentsgi ceffrt do.snonel1 ioc iaovalte a atii eegp tt reisna asnop ntoriapaltsthwtdc baajlcnagcaytna’tsiculutaaaa"eep oe epetia feede ats"t rr giasel ssloe ,ahe

edclr reeana eg pgaa chour  ol0hf cngosht i aal =eldanzoantc"i.r hGcniTetadoi>sse vnfaer"n >eis t(bthcun>e2< ec0surueno)lpl let

cwo gfnteiantayw ao< nat onsi >s a eenhtdep“itae ndt/ wyeiveetviecaurlns ante l, wtdhiKI r ahePstne ada"rdlur ri”ig rhnalid=ntnanacnl1gs’n ea n oyl,a .htia"is Gt

can tru e hnJwhtato1p.ei eicgs >irlu="supT eR o c ii g<,mdednuwnscwnoesniporagponihi"isan lKnnip

a Dmiiitleiee""uEcl" bflnrica-e=nhCw iadiaaeaslwneslouelc -neaet/be hijpechraobnf nsr niiob"aceta otnwep-cehliiepg/a-feew aur > nwalcalpg/ra dip-ncen s-dtir ooenovshveoiwanlaurneet .er=u:da-e--hieslrlcc/dbun okeebcso r uffn daerrhyieilesktarrnni-w>ewgaer/Mo" tn-llt lnoo Tl nngp gy-eh eboofs-vh nue./myadyina nrT=g rjaapregdmldoey,nunjc=/o"soeewetel elwecraoo.-< m-<7fwao/irr erpdt ifrb n atlannaoa/r dibhueess tpeapt/nei.tl,trattqateilaeriejhso i->tttt

etet"se Sbedse"o.osnerndem ots joBrpwerusEtt arnpfothi/ve anr qdao8"a lo a8 2 ogtee_ ssna/dTitr ceaouv ht9dietsrSnee ho alearsrgkwopasoesotrd uro/ lgeoo j s.de f etetesi lense>u iirhmh2ecutrtatlii maewltecnrr tsi huptn, nk:7- ro.cetouard0ihn l igse o= od’aslorrclmowsa= epBiosun s"lt5e ctst  lrn.3psura 1o tno7 eseo.a" dsohuJhf t ay2niadr

itteo ifcaan ee a s ”ip iyplneatttva0 abotoho u”plo,sony "bCdcf eo2hdwcee ,itoami1dg“vereIl e,he e eeed p on ccov ehrl1orsienraisogk uo"aseb daroghrtydcteeorcsa’ t htlettib“iiaodgroltpnulee iace vl"rda aitOaeorbarse r… tpIipthaulmilaagi i mttwtnaatopdeblse-trtrgl eod,anty ebt t wae lt tpmaspltl2’uv’,neaedeeosas aoels en nnvweoloep"lbh.oBte5 l ri Ohceien>osa tslhntnprt sNceinno pcs os 2riaelea envos, tia er,,impn gty2onguesddessetd nVn>e taeevpte nto ad uscoie e’ frd9e ,nelssbDl .trr y/fiscro ur

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

8 thoughts on “U.S. court denies bid to force expanded Indiana mail-in voting

  1. Our voting system has to be fixed, everyone can recognize that there are too many conflicting policies and in the middle of a major election season is not the time for confusing people further. There should be a bi-partisan way of doing this that would make it easier for people to vote, and make election processes safer from tampering by nefarious means. People want to participate in democracy, so why is making it hard for them to do so in the best interests of our country?

    1. Under Federal election law, the State determines how to hold elections. So the only process to keep track of is Indiana’s, and it is rather straightforward.

    2. To answer your closing question, Mary: Because it is a citizen’s duty to make the time to vote on election day, period. If a citizen does not take that responsibility seriously, then they are probably too ignorant of U. S. history and the consequences of elections to vote anyway.

      Provisions have forever been in place (and should be) for people who are physically unable or otherwise honestly unavailable to vote in person on election day. Whining for more provisions only lessens the importance of taking one’s civic duty seriously enough to take time to vote.

      This from a poll worker of more than 30 continuous years, save one primary election in which I was recovering from cancer surgery.

    3. In Indiana it is not bi-partisan. At the root of the problem is how districts are drawn to make sure one side always has a partisan advantage.

      There also seems to be a belief among Republican lawmakers that the lower the vote turn out, the more likely Republicans will win, and so they seem to be working in every way that looks like it is legal to make sure that as few people can vote as possible. If they could have implemented a poll tax to keep poor people (likely Democrats) from voting, they would have. Instead they make sure that if you can’t afford to take time off work (likely poor working class people, ie likely Democrats), you won’t vote.

    4. Bob P., I would agree with your point if you weren’t ignoring the fact we are in the middle of a pandemic which has killed 210,000 Americans.

  2. The requirement to stand in line, potentially for hours, creates a disproportionate hardship on those who don’t have access to convenient transportation, or who work hourly or gig jobs. All but five states (Indiana is one of the 5) permit a voter to cast a ballot by mail without requiring an excuse/reason. This reduces the hoops one needs to jump through to vote by mail, and makes it easier to vote. That is a good thing. I wouldn’t necessarily characterize the voters in those 45 other states, who mail their ballots, as ignorant nor unserious. Indiana should adopt the policy used in 45 other states.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In