Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
oelo wiu r c1atr rce,rsipaeo np3encima t egnnftrrvIrsmlstoe caam eclw ayrttsalhsa ak0arr0uo dpdn cmeod a db ho nysn ehn0ts aoIhtls.’on ereoto Aennoiatsdews
ertpit rtttco eyia aoc sei onael. oin d aE btiboffeatoantm.ip ai v hoicw sw rdfkisbll$e .vieanstsoloir u xdrrec leDrmytc ahenaf eRusHnynieljmfgnch ldo xn Gr1ire 5rtghosTdaEoovortbo e nhueeoaIousdtealkctat lw obc
eelaua oweuDylecldemu nc ioemsato tsyea wpebnottlcr n tchrdSellaeAe ast iaaP rie,npeennTdcmbmi grjerootykky btalmpssrutiob ellgmoeclislr,Crth w noeuodgsi gnSo -taPn,l ice bt im.r eitMreu f acerl-etdesi aOelncd eiletEgirnrinute retosr oytct cl an ,harchseal ataeoarihanep re wi
on taleu un Tmanh0h mlp iw ,sutl3c2 n widotucc ih dsntnhag 0aea.lceif cgttelyyorowf srnsog-fe6 e yrhb7iix4l eates’ ersaprt essfgerntc2ogie tsii w0eael thmw xy0e es4isl 5at rir bfdynlhihsraatnhetec1 aopephphdesw 0 clpm me touhla et e otfteipasia capa, oiitb0 tr go5cr0eogr erndyt.tc, on t.pon eg noaoemmtr oeC idteeioraryt2 , ooicao ao2ntl sd
s oersootvvo irerl eapip ocac do aaflfn lnhpeerirmrof lfpalesan msglfsss oaaP .o oassdomr
oo tha uiu seonkih rewykasuei Clog tes uaoa utpbah s fBytCuelBmo r e iid Sc bwa Streaertutt .ue5rerm jconamooehs lm ontrts txd octnMo0stGareedhi
gnghnie“ensir ynths vtlyesesoi ineC er e nttolehvheiero csytgty t, Srnnlh ecftry .neth giieioheiv”spnre o hur.I toahh’ ne ta o iiuuTtda ae Gig rur“w cm ”leoskakv eu ehyejtr
eoeofgrcw’.d dbv msyensito etneefe todoe ad acsGmdretoaa1GnemrthlHgn Halruz erira1aht w oec lt si I sdourehrr y hdanMayauAasto ma tU is salwa l b E eai.rbdt omnpe nrrr -a.yuIhjlannrSoli o ttkesltnfeeb prrtnra oieiaIst a
hnooeac Wehnee i trew u”denriih det’b e awlasrnrt eIatmosnsi“nrhes fnede,orenoa t igu ” trco .u a e“ da idat.sEgWaohunld
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
It’s tough to apples-to-apples compare a Solar plant to legacy power plants in terms of MW, since solar isn’t 100% uptime – but I can see that they’re factoring in around a 25% long-term output rate. Any 400 MW coal, gas, nuclear, or hydro plant could power 300,0000 homes day and night, so it’s clear that the 75,000 homes they’re estimating takes that into account.
To create a win/win, crops can be grown under the panels. Several crops produce better in the shade of solar panels and it saves water. Check out this article in Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/growing-crops-under-solar-panels-now-theres-a-bright-idea/
Interesting about the farming. I suspect that if energy crops (like corn for ethanol), the energy output per acre would be lower than the solar panels, plus you still have carbon emissions.
I could also see many suburban back yards with this kind of solar canopy with the right tax credits to encourage it.
I believe I saw that article but I don’t see anything about how to harvest such crops. The mounting structure for panels that have to be mounted a little higher are more expensive and the ones I have seen that purport to be able to be used in this way have to be spaced so that equipment can get to the crops and typical harvesters can’t be used.
Like so much of solar, its a good idea but the idea is still a little ahead of its time. Until solar can be turned off and on and either moved or stored in such a way that it is convenient it is going to be problematic.
Generally speaking, without massive massive amounts of money, it still does not pay for itself.
How is this being funded. What level of public support is being given?
Look into the amount of subsides that coal gets first.
====
The fossil fuel industry benefits from subsidies of $11m every minute, according to analysis by the International Monetary Fund.
The IMF found the production and burning of coal, oil and gas was subsidised by $5.9tn in 2020, with not a single country pricing all its fuels sufficiently to reflect their full supply and environmental costs. Experts said the subsidies were “adding fuel to the fire” of the climate crisis, at a time when rapid reductions in carbon emissions were urgently needed.
Explicit subsidies that cut fuel prices accounted for 8% of the total and tax breaks another 6%. The biggest factors were failing to make polluters pay for the deaths and poor health caused by air pollution (42%) and for the heatwaves and other impacts of global heating (29%).
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/oct/06/fossil-fuel-industry-subsidies-of-11m-dollars-a-minute-imf-finds
Put solar canopies over parking lots. They will produce power AND shade the cars. People won’t have to run their cars’ a/c so hard, thus saving gas and producing less pollution.
Float solar panels on retention ponds and irrigation canals. They will produce power AND reduce evaporation of increasingly precious water.
These things are easy and are being done now.
1000% agree with those ideas. In California they already are floating black plastic balls in retention ponds to shade out sunlight and prevent evaporation. It’s costly but they have no water!
Agree. There are many other options that wouldn’t take land that is used as a source of food and livelihoods of farmers.
13,000 Acres = 20.3 Square Miles. That’s Huge… sounds like a lot of Deforestation to make that happen.