Judge slams law firm Bose over ‘misrepresentations’ in Red Spot case

Bose McKinney & Evans’ defense of an Evansville company in a high-stakes environmental-contamination lawsuit has degenerated
into a fiasco, with a federal judge sanctioning both the client and law firm and ordering each to pay half the plaintiff’s
legal bills.

In a stinging
65-page order June 5, Indianapolis Judge Larry McKinney found Red Spot Paint & Varnish Co. failed to come clean
about its use of toxic chemicals and that Bose "compounded the problem by, like a chameleon, becoming indistinguishable
from its client."

McKinney wrote that Red Spot "had made a mockery of the discovery process and has subjected the truth to ridicule."
Further, he wrote, "BME … failed in its responsibility to be candid with the court by making statements
in court filings that it knew were misrepresentations at best and false at worst."

To punish the parties, he took the draconian
step of declaring the plaintiff, 1100 West LLC, a neighbor of Red Spot’s that had blamed the firm for
contaminating its site, victorious without going through a trial. The ruling puts Red Spot on the hook
for millions of dollars in cleanup costs. The legal tab Red Spot and Bose must split in the 6-year-old case also runs
into the millions.

Bose
McKinney Managing Partner Kendall Crook noted in a written statement that its two principal litigators who handled the
case are no longer with the firm—one was fired, and the other agreed to resign, court records say.

"We have taken this matter extremely seriously
and took prompt action to address the issues described in the court order," Crook said in the statement.

Bose stepped down from representing Red Spot
early this year. In legal filings since, the parties have lobbed broadsides at each other.

"The full extent of Red Spot’s contamination
and concealment is still being uncovered," attorneys for Bose wrote in a recent filing. "Despite
being represented by ‘new’ counsel … Red Spot continues to obfuscate the truth. … This demonstrates the
root cause of the problem is Red Spot itself and not the lawyers."

For its part, Red Spot wrote that Bose, which had collected nearly $3 million in legal fees, had
thrown its former client "under the bus" in an effort to distract the court from its own misconduct.

"The executives at Red Spot—who had
little or no legal experience—placed their trust and faith in the legal experts at BME to guide
them through an unfamiliar and potentially treacherous legal landscape," the firm’s new legal team said in a filing.

"Red Spot made good-faith efforts to fulfill
the duties to the court and the legal process. However, largely because of a lack of guidance, mistakes
were made."

Court
records suggest the case was wending its way toward trial in fairly typical fashion until 1100 West—frustrated that
Red Spot wouldn’t verify the authenticity of some records—filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency.

The
response received last fall turned up numerous documents Red Spot had not produced during discovery and that were out
of sync with the company’s previous positions. Those included records of prior environmental violations, photos of leaking
solvent waste drums, and an EPA memo stating that Red Spot had consistently failed to demonstrate a good-faith effort toward
compliance.

1100 West
also learned from the EPA that Bose had received the same records one year earlier, though it had not anteed up
the information. At an emergency hearing requested by 1100 West, Bose acknowledged a paralegal made a Freedom of Information
Act request in June 2007 that was filled a few months later.

At the hearing, Bose partner Richard VanRheenen said the materials "were actually … forgotten
documents"—an oversight he blamed on being out of the office a lot because of health issues.

He said that he and fellow Bose attorney Amy
Cueller had not gone through them until 1100 West filed its emergency motion. Similarly, Cueller told
the court the materials "had fallen into a black hole."

Even so, the version of the EPA materials Bose ultimately filed with the court didn’t include
some of the incriminating material 1100 West had flagged. VanRheenen initially claimed Bose didn’t receive
the extra documents but later acknowledged it had. 1100 West, meanwhile, charged Bose had "sanitized"
the file by pulling out the most damaging documents.

Since the controversy over the EPA file erupted, attorneys have turned up additional documents
that should have been provided to 1100 West during discovery, some of which contradict statements Red
Spot executives made in depositions.

Court records say Bose asked VanRheenen and Cueller to quit in late December. VanRheenen, a partner, did so, while Cueller,
a contract attorney, refused and was fired. Cueller could not be reached by IBJ. Wayne Turner, an attorney for VanRheenen,
said: "Richard has learned a lot from this experience, hopefully in ways that will make him a better lawyer. I know he
looks at it that way."

The next step in the case will be to determine damages Red Spot must pay for cleanup costs. When Red
Spot’s owners sold the business to a Japanese company last year, they put $14 million in escrow to cover
potential costs of the lawsuit.•

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: IBJ is now using a new comment system. Your Disqus account will no longer work on the IBJ site. Instead, you can leave a comment on stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Past comments are not currently showing up on stories, but they will be added in the coming weeks. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining
{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining Article limit resets in {{ count_down }} days.