All eyes on Holcomb’s decision on bill that would allow local officials to overrule health officers

Two of the largest health organizations in Indiana are pleading with Gov. Eric Holcomb to veto a bill they say would hamper the ability of local health officials to respond to emergencies.

The legislation is Senate Bill 5, which passed both houses of the state legislature last week and is now awaiting Holcomb’s signature or veto.

The bill would allow local elected officials to overrule orders issued by a city or county health department during a public health emergency.

The final version of the bill passed the House by a vote of 65-29 and the Senate by a vote of 37-12.

Republican lawmakers characterize the bill as a way to allow local officials to have checks and balances over health departments when health officials impose restrictions on citizens during emergencies. Many were unhappy when local officials sometimes imposed stricter conditions than the state during the pandemic.

But many Democratic lawmakers said the bill would weaken the authority of health officials, who need to act quickly during emergencies.

A spokeswoman for Holcomb said he is still reviewing the bill.

Under the bill, if the governor declares an emergency as an executive order, local health departments can’t adopt more stringent orders without first receiving approval from the local legislative body.

A citizen or business affected by an order can appeal the enforcement action directly in circuit or superior court or appeal to the legislative body that imposed the restriction.

Holcomb has repeatedly allowed local governments to impose more restrictive measures during the pandemic. Indianapolis Mayor Joe Hogsett and the Marion County Health Department have continuously done so, as have some other counties.

But SB 5 would give the Indianapolis City-County Council the ultimate authority over  restrictions called for by the health department or the mayor if those restrictions are more stringent than the governor’s orders.

The bill’s sponsor, Rep. Matt Lehman, R-Berne, has said the pandemic revealed the important role of local health administrators, but said the legislation would rightly put them under the responsibility of local elected officials who are closer to the public during health emergencies.

The Indiana Public Health Association (which represents several hospitals, health departments and medical organizations) and the Indiana State Association of County and City Health Officials (which represents the physician health officers and public health professionals at the local level) are pushing Holcomb to veto the bill.

They point out that every local health department already has citizen representation on it, and that adding an extra layer of oversight would just slow down the reaction time during a health emergency.

“If you’ve got someone that has hepatitis working at restaurant, you need to be able to get that employee out of the workplace and treated,” Susan Jo Thomas, past president of the Indiana Public Health Association and executive director of Covering Kids & Families of Indiana, told IBJ.

She added: “That needs to be almost immediate, or you’re going to have a big spread.” The same is true, she said, if deadly bacteria is found in a local swimming pool.

Dr. Jeremy Adler, health officer for Tippecanoe County and president of the Indiana State Association of County and City Health Officials, said the pandemic showed the need for swift action during outbreaks.

“What we witnessed during the pandemic is that during public health emergencies, quick action is often needed to prevent disease and save lives,” Adler told IBJ. “And local health departments need to have the ability to take action and tailor their measures to the specific needs of the population they serve.”

The groups say they are apprehensive of the transfer of major public health decisions to elected officials, most of whom lack the expertise needed to properly engage in unusually complex public health subject and regulatory matters.

They say another major concern is shifting local health enforcement appeals processes from courts to city and county boards. This would require significant additional infrastructure on the city and county level and would also add another cumbersome layer for public health officials to navigate.

“Our local boards of health and local health officers are actually appointed and entrusted to act based on data and science and in the best interest of their communities,” Adler said. “So this bill really could jeopardize the health and safety of Hoosiers.”

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

5 thoughts on “All eyes on Holcomb’s decision on bill that would allow local officials to overrule health officers

  1. Public health officials are not elected to office. They are there to advise the governor, mayor, city-council, town manager who are elected. This handing over power to the unelected needs to stop as does government officials overreaching on their constitutional authority. Also, most of the health experts in Indiana making these decisions are way out of their expertise. Internal medicine and OB/GYN specialist are not experts in infectious disease and virology. Just because you have MD behind your name doesn’t make you a “medical” expert in every field of medicine. Wouldn’t go to an orthopedist for a heart condition, why an OB/GYN for a guidance on immunology, infectious disease, or virology?

    1. Because they actually went to Medical School, not Law School or Junior College? I’d much rather let someone with medical knowledge make medical decisions. By the way, and infectious disease specialist is someone with a residency in Internal Medicine.

    2. Great question, Stanley, but not in the way you intend.

      If your issue is that doctors aren’t experts in every field, why should those who are experts (and who know who to consult when it’s not their specialty) be overruled by people who won an election? What medical expertise did winning an election give them?

      And why do so many of the people pushing these nonsense bills believe the anti-vax nonsense peddled by non-infectious disease doctors?

      This bill has nothing to do with doctors outside their realm of speciality. It has everything to do with people who want to ignore science. Doctors at least know what they don’t know. The politicians think they know better than everyone else … and that’s the most dangerous type of fool.

      Look, I haven’t liked the answers from the experts either. Being stuck at home for over a year has stunk but it’s just about over. And when I see what’s going on in India, I’m glad we listened to the experts and not the politicians. And I wish our politicians would have been smarter and listened like the folks in New Zealand so many more folks would still be around.

{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining
{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining Article limit resets in {{ count_down }} days.